Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs QwQ 32B

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B, both from Qwen, in 2 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 40K, tested across 7 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.

Which is better, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or QwQ 32B?

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 2 blind community votes on Rival. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. Context windows: 131K vs 40K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.

Key Differences Between Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is made by qwen while QwQ 32B is from qwen. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a 131K token context window compared to QwQ 32B's 40K. On pricing, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.11/M input tokens vs $0.5/M for QwQ 32B. In community voting, In 2 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.

In 2 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.

Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
QwQ 32B
QwQ 32BRunner-up

Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 2 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Web Design.

Clear winner
Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
97%

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
QwQ 32B
56%Vocabulary64%
14wSentence Length12w
0.37Hedging0.36
5.7Bold13.6
4.0Lists8.4
0.54Emoji0.00
0.70Headings0.00
0.14Transitions0.39
Based on 22 + 4 text responses
vs

Ask them anything yourself

Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507QwQ 32B

279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.

We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.

AI Hallucination Index 2026
Free preview13 of 58 slides
FAQ

Common questions