Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs QwQ 32B
Compare Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and QwQ 32B, both from Qwen, in 2 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 131K vs 40K, tested across 15 shared challenges.
Web Design: Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of votes
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
QwQ 32BRunner-up
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 2 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 particularly excels in Web Design.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
4.5× cheaper
Output
$0.60
2.5× cheaper
QwQ 32B
Input
$0.50
Output
$1.50
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 4.5× input, 2.5× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
66%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
QwQ 32B
56%Vocabulary64%
14wSentence Length12w
0.37Hedging0.36
5.7Bold13.6
4.0Lists8.4
0.54Emoji0.00
0.70Headings0.00
0.14Transitions0.39
Based on 22 + 4 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
