Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507vsQwen3.8 Max Prime
Updated Sep 2026

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507vsQwen3.8 Max Prime

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max Prime at $0.2/M vs $4/M input tokens.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime compared across 19 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Input price$0.2/M tokens$4/M tokens
Output price$0.8/M tokens$12/M tokens
Context window131K tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Sep 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 19 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507615 words
1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Key Inputs at Close (FY2025): Revenue: $900M EBITDA: $120M Purchase Price: 12.0x EBITDA → EV = $1.44B Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1.44B = $28.8M (equity-funded) Total Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA → Debt = $660M Term Loan: 4.0x → $480M Mezzanine: 1.5x → $180M Equity Required…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime673 words
HarborTech Services (HTS) – LBO Underwriting Memo Entry & Capital Structure Item Amount FY2025 EBITDA $120.0m Entry Multiple 12.0x Enterprise Value $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2.0% of EV) $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x, 9.0% cash, 1.0% amort) $480.0m Mezzanine (1.5x, 12.0% cash + 2.0% PIK) $180.0m Sponsor…
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507207 words
Dish Name: Sunny Sauté Skillet Ingredients (7 pantry staples): Olive oil Garlic (fresh, minced) Dried spaghetti (or any short pasta) Canned crushed tomatoes Dried oregano Salt & black pepper Grated Parmesan cheese Instructions: Prep (5 mins): Bring a pot of salted water to a boil.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime223 words
🍯 Golden Hour Noodles A sweet, savory, garlicky pasta that tastes like it took way more effort than it did. Ingredients (7) # Ingredient Amount 1 Spaghetti 8 oz (half a box) 2 Butter 3 tablespoons 3 Garlic, minced 4 cloves 4 Honey 2 tablespoons 5 Soy sauce 1 tablespoon 6 Red pepper flakes ½ teaspoon 7 Parmesan cheese…
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,728 words
The provided Software Consulting Agreement contains several clauses that are heavily one-sided in favor of the Client and could significantly disadvantage the Contractor, potentially rendering the agreement unenforceable or exploitative under contract law, fairness principles, and standard industry practices.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime2,126 words
Contract Analysis: Exploitative Clauses & Recommended Modifications Executive Summary This agreement is severely one-sided in favor of the Client. Nearly every clause shifts risk, cost, or obligation onto the Contractor while granting the Client broad unilateral rights. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507495 words
Here’s a simple, realistic 1-month plan focused on three foundational pillars of health and longevity: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep. Each area includes beginner-friendly, actionable steps that build sustainable habits without overwhelming beginners. Month-Long Health & Longevity Plan (3 Key Areas) 1.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime473 words
Your 1-Month Foundation Plan A simple, progressive plan built on three pillars. Each week, you add one small layer. No perfection required—just consistency. 🏃 Pillar 1: Movement Why: Even modest activity reduces all-cause mortality risk and improves mood, sleep, and energy within days.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25071,482 words
3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for the Biohacker Designed for Peak Biological Age Reversal, Cognitive Excellence, Physical Resilience, and Stress Mastery 🎯 OVERVIEW: THE 3-MONTH LONGEVITY TRIUMVIRATE This plan integrates epigenetic modulation, mitochondrial rejuvenation, neuroplasticity…
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime2,622 words
The Apex Longevity Protocol: A 3-Month Biohacker's Blueprint Disclaimer: This plan is for informational purposes only. Consult a physician before beginning any new supplement, fasting, or exercise protocol. Bloodwork and medical clearance are prerequisites.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507729 words
Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with detailed explanations of why they’re problematic and concrete suggestions for strengthening them: 1. Weak Claim: "We use advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
Read the full answer
Qwen3.8 Max Prime834 words
The 3 Weakest Claims in the MindMeld AI Pitch The TAM Calculation (Slide 4) The Claim: "We're targeting the 3.5 billion smartphone users worldwide. TAM: $180B." Why it's weak: This is a textbook example of TAM inflation that will immediately erode investor trust.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3.8 Max Prime has the edge: newer, bigger context window.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 15x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Input
$0.20
20× cheaper
Output
$0.80
15× cheaper
Qwen3.8 Max Prime
Input
$4.00
Output
$12.00

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper on both: 20× input, 15× output.

Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 25075 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
SStreamLake$0.05 in·$0.19 out·128k·99.2% upDDekaLLM$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.2% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.09 in·$0.30 out·262k·98.4% upAlibaba Cloud$0.13 in·$0.52 out·131k·99.8% upNNebiusfp8degraded$0.10 in·$0.30 out·262k·93.1% up
Qwen3.8 Max Prime1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$4.00 in·$12.00 out·1M·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 25 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has a 131K token context window vs Qwen3.8 Max Prime's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 19 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 19 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Max Prime costs $4/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $3.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.8 Max Prime across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoSolar Mini 4 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGLM 5.3 Prime logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoCommand A+ logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoClaude Opus 5.5 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGPT-6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-6 Sol Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-6 Sol ProLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoGPT-6 Luna logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs GPT-6 LunaLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoQwen3.8 Omni Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.4 Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.4 ProNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.5 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.5New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.6 Luna logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.6 LunaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logoGPT-5.6 Luna Pro logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs GPT-5.6 Luna ProNew provider

Model pages

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 logo
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 250759 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.8 Max Prime logo
Qwen3.8 Max Prime19 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed