Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507vsQwen3 Max
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3 Max at $0.071/M vs $1.2/M input tokens.
| Spec | Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.071/M tokens | $1.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.285/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 262K tokens | 256K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2025 | Sep 2025 |
Our Verdict
Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 Max has the edge: bigger model tier.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs 21x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
17× cheaper
Output
$0.28
21× cheaper
Qwen3 Max
Input
$1.20
Output
$6.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 17× input, 21× output.
Where to run it
2 hosts
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 25071 host
Qwen3 Max1 host
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 9 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
69%
Qwen3 Max uses 2.2x more hedging
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 Max
52%Vocabulary60%
15wSentence Length28w
0.20Hedging0.43
7.0Bold5.4
4.2Lists3.7
0.89Emoji0.69
0.91Headings0.70
0.10Transitions0.14
Based on 28 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 120BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT OSS 20BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider