Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B, both from Qwen, context windows of 262K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is 7.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.07
3.5× cheaper
Output
$0.28
7.0× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input
$0.25
Output
$2.00
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 3.5× input, 7.0× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
54%
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 uses 67.9x more emoji
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
54%Vocabulary51%
14wSentence Length15w
0.12Hedging0.39
7.5Bold6.8
4.2Lists4.8
0.68Emoji0.00
0.93Headings0.84
0.12Transitions0.14
Based on 16 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
