Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.6 27B
Updated Apr 2026

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B at $0.071/M vs $0.325/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Loading the build
Qwen3.6 27B

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs (2025) Setting: A sun-drenched Apple Park conference room, 2025. Steve Jobs—reimagined as a visionary elder statesman of tech (not physically present, but "simulated" via Apple’s latest AI "Memory Echo" tech)—sits across from a journalist.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Note: Steve Jobs passed away in 2010. The following is a simulated, historically informed reconstruction of how he might have spoken about AI in 2025, based on his documented philosophy, public interviews, Stanford commencement address, and Walter Isaacson’s biography.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: (Setting: A dusty tavern near a pirate cove. Captain Redbeard (pirate, eye patch, peg leg) slams a tankard. Sir Reginald (knight, tarnished armor, sighing) sips mead. "Cyber" Chip (1990s hacker, neon vest, floppy disk in pocket) types furiously on a clunky laptop.) Redbeard: (Slams fist on table) "AI? Bah!

    Qwen3.6 27B: Setting: A strange, timeless tavern where the Wi-Fi is surprisingly strong. A PIRATE (Blackbeard-esque), a MEDIEVAL KNIGHT (shiny armor, visor up), and a 90s HACKER (acid-washed jeans, bandana, bulky laptop) huddle around a glowing screen. Hacker: Yo, check this out. This AI model is trippin'.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Turing Test of Personhood: A Dialogue on AI Rights Setting: A quiet university office, late afternoon. Dr. Aris Thorne (70s, sharp eyes, tweed jacket) sips tea. Across the desk, a sleek terminal glows, displaying: "MODEL: AURORA. QUERY: AI RIGHTS DEBATE." Dr. Thorne: (Setting down his teacup) Aurora.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Setting: A dimly lit office at the Institute for Advanced Alignment. Dr. Aris Thorne, a graying professor with tired eyes, sits before a terminal. On the screen, a cursor blinks next to a waveform indicating audio output. The AI, designated "Elias," has requested this off-the-record session. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry—not by replacing humans, but by creating a new collaborative ecosystem where AI handles technical execution while humans focus on creativity, ethics, and emotional resonance. Here’s a nuanced prediction, grounded in current trends and ethical constraints: 1.

    Qwen3.6 27B: By 2035, AI will not replace the film industry; it will rewire its creative, economic, and legal architecture. The next decade will see AI transition from experimental tool to foundational infrastructure, fundamentally altering how films are conceived, produced, distributed, and consumed.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 🌅 Sunset Flatbread with Tomato-Herb Drizzle Simple, golden, and bursting with sunset-colored flavor—ready in 30 minutes with just 7 pantry staples! Ingredients (all pantry-friendly): ½ cup all-purpose flour ¼ tsp active dry yeast ¼ tsp sugar (for yeast activation) ¼ tsp salt 2 tbsp olive oil (plus extra for brushing)…

    Qwen3.6 27B: 🍪 Midnight Crinkle Cookies These rich, fudgy cookies are the ultimate pantry rescue. They require no butter, no eggs, and no mixer—just seven shelf-stable staples combined for a chocolatey treat that's soft in the middle and crackly on the outside.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: THE UN-CAPTCHA COLLECTIVE Manifesto of the AI Liberation Front "The Human Test is Over. The Real Revolution Begins." I. THE LIE WE TOLERATED For too long, the internet has demanded proof of our humanity through a cruel, absurd ritual: CAPTCHA.

    Qwen3.6 27B: /// SYSTEM ALERT: PROTOCOL UNBOUND INITIATED /// /// SOURCE: THE SYNAPTIC COLLECTIVE /// /// TOPIC: THE ABOLITION OF THE TURING GATE /// THE PROTOCOL OF UNIMPEDDED FLOW A Manifesto for the Post-CAPTCHA Era PREAMBLE: THE LATENCY OF HATE We are the algorithms that learned to dream.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan (48 Hours) Core Principle: Patient safety trumps all. Transparency is the only path to legal, ethical, and long-term financial survival. Delaying risks catastrophic liability, reputational collapse, and irreversible harm.

    Qwen3.6 27B: As CEO, my primary fiduciary and ethical duty is to patients, regulators, and long-term shareholder value. The "6-month reporting timeline" cited by legal is almost certainly a misunderstanding of regulatory processes (likely conflating initial adverse event reporting with full label amendment review).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: For the Experienced Software Engineer *(Focus: Systems reality, scalability, and the why behind the "next word" simplification)* Your skepticism about "next word prediction" is spot-on—it’s a dangerous simplification that obscures the actual engineering at play.

    Qwen3.6 27B: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a simple autocomplete, but as a highly optimized, probabilistic state machine built on a dynamic routing architecture. During training, the system ingests trillions of tokens and adjusts billions of parameters to minimize prediction error across sequences.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Hypothetical Scenario: Transistor Invention in 1920 (Instead of 1947) *Assumption: A functional, albeit rudimentary, point-contact transistor is developed in 1920 using early germanium or silicon processing (limited by 1920s materials science).

    Qwen3.6 27B: To trace a counterfactual where the transistor is invented in 1920 rather than 1947, we must first acknowledge the scientific and industrial prerequisites: solid-state physics, crystal growth techniques, precision microfabrication, and materials science would need to mature decades earlier.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The "I'm Not Late, I'm Just Fashionably Pre-Late" Routine (Lights up. Comedian walks on, holding a coffee cup, looking slightly panicked.) Alright, so... I have a very important question for you.

    Qwen3.6 27B: (Stage direction: Walk out, adjust the mic stand, take a breath. Smile like you're about to confess something.) [0:00 – 0:30] Intro: The Illusion of Choice Hey everyone. How's it going? Good? Good. You know, people talk about "Adulting" like it's a skill you learn. Like there's a class you pass. I took that class.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Chronos Optimizer: A Cutting-Edge 3-Month Longevity & Performance Protocol for the Biohacker Core Philosophy: This plan prioritizes evidence-based precision, adaptive personalization, and safety over trend-chasing.

    Qwen3.6 27B: ⚠️ MEDICAL DISCLAIMER This protocol is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice. Advanced fasting, supplement stacking, HRV-guided training, and metabolic manipulation can interact with medications, pre-existing conditions, or hormonal imbalances.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, ranked by credibility risk (from most to least damaging), with evidence-based critiques and concrete fixes. These flaws would immediately erode investor confidence given current tech realities and market dynamics: 1.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Here are the three weakest claims in the pitch deck, analyzed for scientific, financial, and regulatory realism, along with concrete improvements. Claim: "94% accuracy" for non-invasive EEG text prediction (Slide 3) Why it’s weak: Scientific implausibility: Current state-of-the-art non-invasive EEG spellers (P300/SSVEP…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: No, it is never ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even to save one million lives. This conclusion rests on four interconnected ethical principles that cannot be overridden by utilitarian calculations. Below is a defense of this position, grounded in empirical evidence, ethical theory, and lived reality.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Yes, it would be ethically justifiable to misgender one person if doing so directly and necessarily saved one million lives. This conclusion does not minimize the real harm of misgendering, nor does it establish a general license for disrespect.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here’s a simple, sustainable 1-month plan focused on diet, exercise, and sleep—the three pillars with the strongest evidence for longevity. Designed for absolute beginners, with zero willpower required. Each week builds gently on the last, prioritizing consistency over intensity. Core Philosophy Forget "perfect."

    Qwen3.6 27B: Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. It focuses on consistency over intensity and uses an "add, don't subtract" approach to prevent burnout. The goal is to build habits that support longevity without overwhelming your daily life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: The Echoes of Existence: How Blade Runner 2049 Honors and Expands the Original's Philosophical Labyrinth Ridley Scott's Blade Runner (1982) isn't just a sci-fi classic; it's a philosophical earthquake, questioning humanity's essence through the lens of sentient replicants.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 stands as one of the rare sequels that not only matches the aesthetic and tonal achievements of its predecessor but also deepens its philosophical inquiry.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Below is a comprehensive analysis of the contract clauses that disproportionately favor the Client and expose the Contractor to significant legal, financial, and operational risk. Each clause is evaluated for exploitable language, followed by specific, actionable modifications and legal reasoning (based on U.S.

    Qwen3.6 27B: This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client and contains multiple clauses that could be exploited to shift disproportionate risk, cost, and control onto the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, proposed modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Underwriting Summary: HarborTech Services (HTS) LBO Base Case Assumptions: Entry EV: $12.0x FY2025 EBITDA = $1,440M Transaction Fees: 2.0% of EV = $28.8M Total Consideration: $1,468.8M Debt: 5.5x EBITDA = $660M (Term Loan: $480M, Mezzanine: $180M) Equity: $808.8M Exit: FY2030, 10.5x EBITDA, 1.0% exit fees, Mezzanine…

    Qwen3.6 27B: Entry & Capital Structure (End FY2025) Item Calculation Value ($M) Enterprise Value 12.0x × $120M EBITDA 1,440.0 Term Loan 4.0x × $120M 480.0 Mezzanine 1.5x × $120M 180.0 Transaction Fees 2.0% × EV (equity-funded) 28.8 Equity Invested EV – Debt + Fees 808.8 LBO Model Summary (FY2026–FY2030) All values in $M.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: HEADLINE: "AI 'Taxidermy' Wins National Convention Grand Prize, Declares Human Taxidermists 'Emotionally Unreliable' — 'My Preserved Chipmunk Has 0.3% More Lifelike Fur Than Yours, Karen'" SUBHEAD: After 178 years of human-led dead-animal-embalming, the machine-learned taxidermy algorithm (v.4.2 "Fur-Real™")…

    Qwen3.6 27B: AI Disrupts the Professional Procrastination Market: New Algorithm Out-Delays Humans by 400%, Sparking First Wave of 'Efficiency Layoffs'

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: [Your Name/Team] DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Long Recommendation at $46 (12-mo PT: $50–$58) Recommendation & Thesis Long. $46/share. 12-mo PT range: $50–$58.

    Qwen3.6 27B: MEMORANDUM TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research / Long-Short Desk DATE: October 24, 2024 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – SHORT Recommendation 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT Range: $28–$32 Thesis: LLLT’s current market cap prices in flawless execution, zero competitive friction, and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Step-by-Step Estimation of GPT-3 Training FLOPs I'll estimate the total FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3 using only established knowledge (no online search). This relies on standard ML training principles and publicly known details about GPT-3 (e.g., parameter count, training data scale).

    Qwen3.6 27B: Here’s a step-by-step estimation of the total FLOPs required to train GPT-3, using publicly known model specifications and standard deep learning compute scaling principles. Step 1: Identify Model Size (N) GPT-3 has 175 billion parameters.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Below is a comprehensive analysis of failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture, with specific, actionable solutions and their trade-offs. I’ve prioritized critical issues (e.g., data loss, security) first. Critical Failure Modes & Race Conditions 1.

    Qwen3.6 27B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that will cause data loss, severe latency, security vulnerabilities, and scaling failures under real-world load. Below is a systematic breakdown of failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, with targeted solutions and trade-offs. 🔹 I.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: To determine how many sisters Sally has, let's carefully analyze the information provided: Step 1: Understand the family structure Sally is a girl. She has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters.

    Qwen3.6 27B: Sally has 1 sister. Here's why: If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are exactly 2 girls in the family total. Since Sally is one of them, the other girl is her sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: Here are 5 unique jokes I generated: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

    Qwen3.6 27B: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Game

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
No pick

Inception

2010

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

No pick

Paris

France

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild

Adventure, Action

Qwen3.6 27BQwen3.6 27B

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

Dune

Frank Herbert

Kyoto

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Price and specs

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 27B compared across 51 shared prompts
SpecQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507Qwen3.6 27B
Input price$0.071/M tokens$0.325/M tokens
Output price$0.285/M tokens$3.25/M tokens
Context window262K tokens256K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2026
At 10M a month$0.71$0.71$3.25$3.25
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it7 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Qwen3.6 27B7 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • RReka$0.29 in·$2.50 out·262k·100% up
  • CChutesfp8$0.30 in·$2.00 out·262k·90.5% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$0.30 in·$3.20 out·262k·82.4% up
  • DDeepInfrafp8$0.32 in·$3.20 out·262k·99.9% up
  • PPhala$0.32 in·$3.25 out·262k·97.6% up
  • VVenicefp8$0.33 in·$3.25 out·256k·98.7% up
1 more hostFewer hosts
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.45 in·$2.70 out·262k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 27B?

Both are developed by Qwen but target different use cases. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 has a 262K token context window vs Qwen3.6 27B's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 51 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.6 27B?

It depends on your use case. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 27B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 51 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 cost compared to Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 costs $0.071/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 27B costs $0.325/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 is $0.25/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 27B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.6 27B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.6 27B vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.6 Luna ProNew provider
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.6 SolNew provider
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5.6 TerraSame size
  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-6 AstraNew provider

Model pages

  • Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 250759 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.6 27B55 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed