Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetvsKimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper than Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet at $0.3/M vs $6/M input tokens.
| Spec | Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet | Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $6/M tokens | $0.3/M tokens |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Nov 2025 |
Our Verdict
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Claude 3.7 Thinking SonnetRunner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct costs 50x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
Input
$0.30
20× cheaper
Output
$0.60
50× cheaper
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct is cheaper on both — 20× input, 50× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
42%
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet uses 4.8x more headings
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Kimi Linear 48B A3B Instruct
61%Vocabulary63%
49wSentence Length15w
0.64Hedging0.19
2.2Bold5.2
4.5Lists3.2
0.00Emoji0.00
1.81Headings0.38
0.21Transitions0.05
Based on 21 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs MiniMax M3New provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs GPT-5New provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)New provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3 0.6BNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3 235B A22BNew provider
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507New provider