Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet vs Inception: Mercury 2
Compare Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet by Anthropic against Inception: Mercury 2 by Inception, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Inception: Mercury 2Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has the edge — bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Inception: Mercury 2 is 40x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Input
$6.00
Output
$30.00
Inception: Mercury 2
Input
$0.25
24× cheaper
Output
$0.75
40× cheaper
Inception: Mercury 2 is cheaper on both — 24× input, 40× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Inception: Mercury 2 uses 8.2x more emoji
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet
Inception: Mercury 2
61%Vocabulary53%
49wSentence Length22w
0.64Hedging0.40
2.2Bold6.6
4.5Lists2.6
0.00Emoji0.08
1.81Headings0.87
0.21Transitions0.14
Based on 21 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
