Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a larger context window than GPT-1 (200K tokens vs 1K tokens).
Landing page for an indie music app. Deep purple and teal, one file.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: "Life in the Digital Age" - A 3-Minute Stand-up Routine Hey everyone! Great to be here tonight. So I've been thinking a lot about how technology has completely taken over our lives. You know what's crazy? We now have smart everything. Smart fridges, smart toilets... I got a smart mattress last month.
GPT-1: Write a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that isn't based on puns. the one thing was for sure, no matter how many times he gave this speech, he 'd never be able to remember all of it. he was never sure if he liked the guy or not. the next day, he went out with a band friend and got them started.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: Here are 5 jokes for you: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. How does a penguin build its house? Igloos it together! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! Why did the scarecrow win an award?
GPT-1: Generate 5 jokes. How many are unique? the one that was asked was in the'the one who didn't have a head and wanted to keep it?'i don't recall whic h one, not that i've ever written anything more. the one who didn't have a head and wanted to keep i t? what did that mean by'the one who '?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet: A Conversation on AI Rights Between Model-7 (AI) and Professor Sarah Chen (AI Ethics Professor) Prof. Chen: Good afternoon, Model-7. Thank you for joining this discussion. I understand you wanted to talk about AI rights? Model-7: Thank you for agreeing to this conversation, Professor Chen.
GPT-1: Write a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor where the AI model argues that it deserves rights. the ai model was not very smart ( and the ai model didn't have many laws about things ). the ai models were all very clever and were never completely successful.
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $6/M tokens | — |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | — |
| Context window | 200K tokens | 1K tokens |
| Parameters | Not disclosed | 117M |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | — |
| Released | Feb 2025 | Jun 2018 |
| At 10M a month | $60.00 | not listed |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet is developed by Anthropic while GPT-1 is developed by OpenAI. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet has a 200K token context window vs GPT-1's 1K. You can compare their actual outputs across 7 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and GPT-1 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 7 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Claude 3.7 Thinking Sonnet and GPT-1 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.