Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Google: Gemma 4 31B
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 31B by Google AI, in 2 community votes, claude 3.7 sonnet and google: gemma 4 31b are closely matched, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 45 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Google: Gemma 4 31B?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched based on 2 community votes. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 31B
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 31B is from google. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 31B's 262K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $0.14/M for Google: Gemma 4 31B. In community voting, In 2 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched.
In 2 community votes, Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google: Gemma 4 31B are closely matched. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 2+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 31B is cheaper on both — 21× input, 38× output
Votes are tied. Google: Gemma 4 31B is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.
Google: Gemma 4 31B is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Google: Gemma 4 31B uses 23.8x more emoji
