Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiMo-V2-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiMo-V2-Pro are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiMo-V2-Pro is from xiaomi. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiMo-V2-Pro's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro.
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 5.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiMo-V2-Pro uses 44.8x more emoji
Compare Claude 3.7 Sonnet by Anthropic against MiMo-V2-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and MiMo-V2-Pro are both competitive models. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro. Context windows: 200K vs 1049K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by anthropic while MiMo-V2-Pro is from xiaomi. Claude 3.7 Sonnet has a 200K token context window compared to MiMo-V2-Pro's 1049K. On pricing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3/M input tokens vs $1/M for MiMo-V2-Pro.
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper on both — 3.0× input, 5.0× output
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
MiMo-V2-Pro is 5.0x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
MiMo-V2-Pro uses 44.8x more emoji