Claude Opus 4.1 vs Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Compare Claude Opus 4.1 by Anthropic against Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI, context windows of 200K vs 262K, tested across 53 shared challenges. Updated May 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.1 or Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B?
Claude Opus 4.1 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B are both competitive models. Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B. Context windows: 200K vs 262K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4.1 and Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Claude Opus 4.1 is made by anthropic while Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is from google. Claude Opus 4.1 has a 200K token context window compared to Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B's 262K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.13/M for Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B.
Per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 115× input, 188× output
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 188x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 uses 38.4x more emoji
