Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs MiniMax M1
Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B by Google AI against MiniMax M1 by MiniMax, context windows of 262K vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiniMax M1
No community votes yet. On paper, these are closely matched - try both with your actual task to see which fits your workflow.
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is 4.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Input
$0.13
2.3× cheaper
Output
$0.40
4.1× cheaper
MiniMax M1
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.65
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on both — 2.3× input, 4.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
36%
MiniMax M1 uses 10.4x more emoji
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
MiniMax M1
58%Vocabulary53%
18wSentence Length17w
0.31Hedging0.51
6.8Bold7.4
3.3Lists6.2
0.00Emoji0.10
0.74Headings0.86
0.15Transitions0.03
Based on 27 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
