Claude Opus 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Compare Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic against DeepSeek V4 Pro by DeepSeek, in 38 community votes, claude opus 4.7 wins 64% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 1.0M vs 1.0M, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Web Design: DeepSeek V4 Pro wins 63% of votes
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4.7 wins 86% of votes
Reasoning: Claude Opus 4.7 wins 60% of votes
Analysis: Claude Opus 4.7 wins 75% of votes
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4.7Winner
DeepSeek V4 ProRunner-up
Pick Claude Opus 4.7. In 38 blind votes, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.
Pick Claude Opus 4.7 for Image Generation, Analysis, Reasoning. Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro for Web Design. DeepSeek V4 Pro is 7.2x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Clear winner
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4.7
Input
$5.00
Output
$25.00
DeepSeek V4 Pro
Input
$1.74
2.9× cheaper
Output
$3.48
7.2× cheaper
DeepSeek V4 Pro is cheaper on both — 2.9× input, 7.2× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
43%
Claude Opus 4.7 uses 24.6x more emoji
Claude Opus 4.7
DeepSeek V4 Pro
64%Vocabulary57%
20wSentence Length18w
0.51Hedging0.52
4.6Bold3.3
3.8Lists2.3
0.86Emoji0.04
1.60Headings0.45
0.03Transitions0.15
Based on 27 + 27 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
