Claude Opus 4 vs DeepSeek R1
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek, in 16 community votes, claude opus 4 wins 58% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 128K, tested across 34 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, Claude Opus 4 or DeepSeek R1?
Claude Opus 4 is the better choice overall, winning 58% of 16 blind community votes on Rival. Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.55/M for DeepSeek R1. Context windows: 200K vs 128K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between Claude Opus 4 and DeepSeek R1
Claude Opus 4 is made by anthropic while DeepSeek R1 is from deepseek. Claude Opus 4 has a 200K token context window compared to DeepSeek R1's 128K. On pricing, Claude Opus 4 costs $15/M input tokens vs $0.55/M for DeepSeek R1. In community voting, In 16 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 58% of head-to-head duels.
In 16 community votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 58% of head-to-head duels. Claude Opus 4 leads in Web Design. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 16+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Claude Opus 4. In 16 blind votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 58% of the time. That's not luck.
Claude Opus 4 particularly excels in Web Design. DeepSeek R1 is 34x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Claude Opus 4 uses 4.2x more sentence length
Ask them anything yourself
279 AI models invented the same fake scientist.
We read every word. 250 models. 2.14 million words. This is what we found.







