Claude Opus 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Compare Claude Opus 4 by Anthropic against Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental by Google AI, in 117 community votes, claude opus 4 wins 54% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 200K vs 1.0M, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Web Design: Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are tied
Image Generation: Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are tied
Conversation: Claude Opus 4 wins 80% of votes
Analysis: Claude Opus 4 and Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental are tied
Our Verdict
Claude Opus 4Winner
Gemini 2.5 Pro ExperimentalRunner-up
Claude Opus 4 has the edge overall. In 117 blind votes, Claude Opus 4 wins 54% of the time.
Claude Opus 4 particularly excels in Conversation. Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is 38x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Claude Opus 4
Input
$15.00
Output
$75.00
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
15× cheaper
Output
$2.00
38× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental is cheaper on both — 15× input, 38× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
40%
Claude Opus 4 uses 11.2x more emoji
Claude Opus 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
64%Vocabulary54%
62wSentence Length15w
0.52Hedging0.35
4.4Bold5.6
9.1Lists3.9
0.11Emoji0.00
1.87Headings0.39
0.27Transitions0.17
Based on 16 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
