What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V3.1 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 is developed by DeepSeek while GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI. DeepSeek V3.1 has a 164K token context window vs GLM 4.7 Flash's 200K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, DeepSeek V3.1 or GLM 4.7 Flash?

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does DeepSeek V3.1 cost compared to GLM 4.7 Flash?

DeepSeek V3.1 costs $0.2/M input tokens and GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.13/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.1vsGLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 at $0.07/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	DeepSeek V3.1	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$0.2/M tokens	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	$0.8/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	164K tokens	200K tokens
Released	Aug 2025	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	66.0%	59.2%

Our Verdict

DeepSeek V3.1

GLM 4.7 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

What do DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.1

Input

$0.20

Output

$0.80

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

2.9× cheaper

Output

$0.40

2.0× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 2.9× input, 2.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

67%

DeepSeek V3.1 uses 2.4x more emoji

DeepSeek V3.1

GLM 4.7 Flash

53%Vocabulary52%

14wSentence Length15w

0.42Hedging0.33

4.0Bold5.8

3.6Lists4.7

0.02Emoji0.00

0.40Headings0.68

0.22Transitions0.13

Based on 23 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5New provider

DeepSeek V3.1 vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider

Updated Jan 2026

DeepSeek V3.1vsGLM 4.7 Flash

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than DeepSeek V3.1 at $0.07/M vs $0.2/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	DeepSeek V3.1	GLM 4.7 Flash
Input price	$0.2/M tokens	$0.07/M tokens
Output price	$0.8/M tokens	$0.4/M tokens
Context window	164K tokens	200K tokens
Released	Aug 2025	Jan 2026
SWE-bench Verified	66.0%	59.2%

Our Verdict

DeepSeek V3.1

GLM 4.7 Flash

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call

What do DeepSeek V3.1 and GLM 4.7 Flash say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V3.1

Input

$0.20

Output

$0.80

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

2.9× cheaper

Output

$0.40

2.0× cheaper

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 2.9× input, 2.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

67%

DeepSeek V3.1 uses 2.4x more emoji

DeepSeek V3.1

GLM 4.7 Flash

53%Vocabulary52%

14wSentence Length15w

0.42Hedging0.33

4.0Bold5.8

3.6Lists4.7

0.02Emoji0.00

0.40Headings0.68

0.22Transitions0.13

Based on 23 + 19 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Opus 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5New provider

DeepSeek V3.1 vs OpenAI Codex MiniNew provider