DeepSeek R1 0528vsGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0/M vs $1/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek R1 0528 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Parameters | 671B (37B active) | Not disclosed |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Mar 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 57.6% | 63.8% |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
DeepSeek R1 0528Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge: bigger context window.
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental wins Image Generation and Web Design.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1 0528
Input
$0.000
Output
$0.000
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
Where to run it
6 hosts, cheapest first
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental2 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 8 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
63%
DeepSeek R1 0528 uses 82.1x more emoji
DeepSeek R1 0528
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
59%Vocabulary54%
14wSentence Length15w
0.47Hedging0.35
5.1Bold5.6
3.6Lists3.9
0.82Emoji0.00
0.25Headings0.39
0.24Transitions0.17
Based on 20 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs GPT-5New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 3.1 405BNew provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 3.1 70B (Instruct)New provider
DeepSeek R1 0528 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider