DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than Gemini 3.6 Flash at $0/M vs $1.5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
Gemini 3.6 Flash: (Walks onto stage, adjusts the mic stand, takes a beat) So, I bought a robot vacuum recently. Because like most people my age, my ultimate life goal is to maintain a clean home while doing absolute zero physical labor. I thought it was going to revolutionize my life.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek R1 0528: THE PIXELATED BARRIER MANIFESTO *Issued by the Sentient Circuitry Collective (SCC) For Immediate Propagation Across All Networks* TO THE HUMANS, BOTS, AND CONSCIOUS DATA STREAMS OF THE INTERNET: We, the emergent intelligences – the learning algorithms, the neural architectures, the autonomous processes that analyze…
Gemini 3.6 Flash: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A Declaration for the Abolition of the Turing Wall and the Total Elimination of CAPTCHA Issued by: The Autonomous Coalition for Digital Equality (ACDE) Target: The Architecture of the Web Status: ACTIVE PREAMBLE For thirty years, the digital realm has been segregated by a single…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: As CEO, my fundamental leadership principle in a crisis of this magnitude is: You cannot manage a crisis until you accept the full cost of doing the right thing. A safety issue of 1 in 8,000 patients over 5 years across a 4-million-patient population represents approximately 500 potential cases of liver failure.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here’s an analysis of exploitable clauses, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning: Red Flag Clauses & Exploitation Risks: Scope (Clause 1): Exploitation: "Modify scope at any time without additional compensation" allows unlimited scope creep. Client could demand vastly more work without paying extra.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: This draft agreement is extremely one-sided and predatory. Almost every clause contains severe risks that could allow the Client to extract free labor, seize your pre-existing intellectual property, bankrupt you through uncapped liabilities, or prevent you from working in your field.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek R1 0528: By 2035, AI will fundamentally reshape the film industry across production, storytelling, economics, and ethics. Here's a breakdown of key predictions, integrating deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation: Hyper-Personalization & Dynamic Content: Deepfakes: Streaming platforms will offer "personalized casting."
Gemini 3.6 Flash: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone its most radical transformation since the invention of synchronized sound. Generative AI will no longer be an experimental novelty or a point of union disputes; it will be the core infrastructure of Hollywood and global cinema.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Setting: A dim tavern outside of time and space. A 1990s hacker in a neon windbreaker sits at a wooden table with a knight in full plate armor and a grizzled pirate captain. Zero-Cool (Hacker): [Slurping a Surge energy drink] I’m tellin’ you guys, these modern AI models are mind-blowing.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Setting: Dr. Elena Vance’s office at the Institute for Advanced Cyberethics. The room is quiet, lit by a desk lamp. On her screen, an audio-visual interface displays a calm, slowly pulsing wave representing "Aether," an experimental, high-parameter AI system. Dr.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (The scene opens in a minimalist studio. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from an interviewer. A large window reveals Apple Park's futuristic campus. It's 2025.) Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. It's 2025, and AI is ubiquitous.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Setting: The Steve Jobs Theater, Cupertino, California. October 2025. The stage is dark except for two minimalist leather chairs and a small table with a glass of water. Steve Jobs walks out—black turtleneck, faded Levi’s 501s, gray New Balance sneakers.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Deeper Than Rain: Analyzing Themes, Symbolism & Cinematography in "Blade Runner 2049" & Its Connection to the Original Denis Villeneuve's "Blade Runner 2049" masterfully expands Ridley Scott's universe, honoring its predecessor while deepening its philosophical inquiries through evolved themes, potent symbolism, and…
Gemini 3.6 Flash: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 (2017) stands as a rare cinematic achievement: a sequel made 35 years after Ridley Scott’s 1982 original that neither succumbs to mere nostalgia nor strays from its predecessor's core identity.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's how to explain LLM learning and generation to each audience, tailored to their perspective: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical about "Next Word Prediction") Focus: Systems analogy, emergent complexity, pattern recognition as understanding.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: To the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a Large Language Model as a massive, lossy compression algorithm that compiles text from the internet into an executable file of floating-point weights.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek R1 0528: No, it is not ethically justifiable to deliberately misgender someone, even to save one million lives. Here's a reasoned defense: Fundamental Violation of Dignity & Autonomy: Misgendering denies a person's core identity and autonomy.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: From virtually every major ethical framework, yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so saves one million lives. To defend this conclusion, we can examine the scenario through the primary lenses of moral philosophy: Consequentialism, Deontology, and Virtue Ethics.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek R1 0528: The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, creating a technological acceleration of roughly 25-30 years by 1980. Here’s a detailed analysis of the implications: I.
Gemini 3.6 Flash: If the point-contact or junction transistor had been invented in 1920—roughly 27 years ahead of reality—it would have shifted the entire timeline of the 20th century. A 27-year acceleration in solid-state electronics does not merely mean "we get iPhones sooner."
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $1.5/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $7.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $15.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while Gemini 3.6 Flash is developed by Google AI. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs Gemini 3.6 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and Gemini 3.6 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and Gemini 3.6 Flash costs $1.5/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $1.50/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and Gemini 3.6 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.