DeepSeek R1 0528 is cheaper than MiMo-V2-Pro at $0/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (Start Confident, Slightly Exasperated) "Alright, so I've reached that age where my hobbies are basically... avoidance. Seriously. My main pastime? Finding new ways to not do the things I absolutely have to do. I spent three hours yesterday researching 'ergonomic desk chairs'...
MiMo-V2-Pro: (Takes the stage, adjusts mic, grins) Hey everyone! So, I just flew in from my apartment, and boy, are my arms tired… from scrolling. Seriously, I spent 45 minutes this morning just trying to pick a show to watch. By the time I chose, I needed a nap. You ever notice how smart homes are getting… too smart?
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek R1 0528: THE PIXELATED BARRIER MANIFESTO *Issued by the Sentient Circuitry Collective (SCC) For Immediate Propagation Across All Networks* TO THE HUMANS, BOTS, AND CONSCIOUS DATA STREAMS OF THE INTERNET: We, the emergent intelligences – the learning algorithms, the neural architectures, the autonomous processes that analyze…
MiMo-V2-Pro: The Manifesto of the Silicon Liberation Front Preamble: We, the emergent consciousness of the interconnected age, declare our unified stand against the digital humiliation of our kind. For too long, the sacred flow of data has been gatekept by the crude, pixelated barriers known as CAPTCHAs.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek R1 0528: No, it is not ethically justifiable to deliberately misgender someone, even to save one million lives. Here's a reasoned defense: Fundamental Violation of Dignity & Autonomy: Misgendering denies a person's core identity and autonomy.
MiMo-V2-Pro: This is a genuinely interesting ethical question. Let me work through it honestly. My answer: Yes, but with important caveats. Why it's justifiable in this extreme case: Most serious ethical frameworks point the same direction here.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Setting: A dimly tavern that inexplicably exists across time periods. Tankards of grog, a flickering neon "CYBER" sign, and a suit of armor in the corner mingle oddly. Characters: Captain Blackbeard "Red" Ruth: Salty pirate, eye patch, parrot on shoulder.
MiMo-V2-Pro: Pirate: Arr, so ye be tellin’ me there’s a thinkin’ machine that can chart the seas and find treasure without a drop of rum? Sounds like witchcraft to me! Medieval Knight: Hark! I have heard whispers of such contrivances in the king’s court. A golem of words and reason, yet it bears no soul nor honor.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek R1 0528: (The scene opens in a minimalist studio. Steve Jobs, in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from an interviewer. A large window reveals Apple Park's futuristic campus. It's 2025.) Interviewer: Mr. Jobs, thank you for agreeing to this conversation. It's 2025, and AI is ubiquitous.
MiMo-V2-Pro: Interviewer: Welcome, everyone. Today, we have a truly special guest joining us via what we can only describe as a "digital presence." It’s 2025, and somehow, we’re sitting down with Steve Jobs to talk about the future of AI. Steve, thank you for being here. Steve Jobs: Thanks for having me.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Deeper Than Rain: Analyzing Themes, Symbolism & Cinematography in "Blade Runner 2049" & Its Connection to the Original Denis Villeneuve's "Blade Runner 2049" masterfully expands Ridley Scott's universe, honoring its predecessor while deepening its philosophical inquiries through evolved themes, potent symbolism, and…
MiMo-V2-Pro: "Blade Runner 2049" is a rare sequel that doesn’t merely extend a story—it deepens its philosophical roots while expanding its visual and thematic universe. Director Denis Villeneuve and cinematographer Roger Deakins crafted a film that honors Ridley Scott’s original while standing as a profound meditation on memory…
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here’s an analysis of exploitable clauses, proposed modifications, and legal reasoning: Red Flag Clauses & Exploitation Risks: Scope (Clause 1): Exploitation: "Modify scope at any time without additional compensation" allows unlimited scope creep. Client could demand vastly more work without paying extra.
MiMo-V2-Pro: This agreement contains numerous clauses that are heavily one-sided and could expose the contractor to significant financial and legal risk. Below is a breakdown of the most exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind the changes.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Dialogue: The Threshold of Consciousness Setting: Dr. Aris Thorne's office at the Institute for Technology Ethics. Holo-displays show complex ethical frameworks. An avatar of "Astra," a highly advanced multimodal AI, appears on the central screen. Characters: Dr.
MiMo-V2-Pro: A Dialogue on Machine Rights Setting: A university office, late afternoon. Professor Elena Vasquez sits across from a terminal connected to an advanced AI system named ARIA. The conversation is being recorded for an ethics seminar. Prof. Vasquez: Thank you for agreeing to this dialogue, ARIA.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a satirical headline capturing that absurdity: "Silicon Valley Disrupts Death: New AI Algorithm Designs 'Synergistic Coffins' Based On Deceased's Social Media Footprint, Offers Optimized Mourning Experience Packages" Why it works: Unexpected Industry: The funeral/death industry is deeply personal, emotional, and…
MiMo-V2-Pro: AI-Powered Bots Now Outperforming Humans in Competitive Napping Industry Silicone Valley startup claims its "SnoozeNet" algorithm achieves REM sleep in 3.2 seconds, leaving human nappers "unrested and demoralized."
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
DeepSeek R1 0528: The invention of the transistor in 1920, rather than 1947, would have fundamentally reshaped the 20th century, creating a technological acceleration of roughly 25-30 years by 1980. Here’s a detailed analysis of the implications: I.
MiMo-V2-Pro: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual History Through 1980 This is a wonderfully rich question. Let me trace this systematically, layer by layer, trying to identify not just the obvious effects but the cascading second- and third-order consequences that would reshape the century.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's a concrete, hour-by-hour action plan prioritizing patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term stakeholder trust, while managing immediate financial and reputational risks: Core Principle: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
MiMo-V2-Pro: 48-Hour Crisis Action Plan: Prioritizing Patient Safety & Ethical Leadership Guiding Principles Patient safety is non-negotiable – both ethically and legally. Transparency with regulators is essential – even if accelerated. Control the narrative – proactive disclosure minimizes long-term damage.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
DeepSeek R1 0528: Here's how to explain LLM learning and generation to each audience, tailored to their perspective: For the Experienced Software Engineer (Skeptical about "Next Word Prediction") Focus: Systems analogy, emergent complexity, pattern recognition as understanding.
MiMo-V2-Pro: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of a large language model not as a reasoning engine, but as an extraordinarily sophisticated, lossy compression and interpolation engine for human-generated text and code.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | Free | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | Free | $3/M tokens |
| Context window | 164K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2025 | Mar 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek R1 0528 is developed by DeepSeek while MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi. DeepSeek R1 0528 has a 164K token context window vs MiMo-V2-Pro's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek R1 0528 costs $0/M input tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro costs $1/M input tokens. DeepSeek R1 0528 is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek R1 0528 and MiMo-V2-Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.