DeepSeek R1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against MiMo-V2-Pro by Xiaomi, context windows of 128K vs 1.0M, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
MiMo-V2-Pro
DeepSeek R1Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, MiMo-V2-Pro has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1
Input
$0.55
1.8× cheaper
Output
$2.19
1.4× cheaper
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input
$1.00
Output
$3.00
DeepSeek R1 is cheaper on both — 1.8× input, 1.4× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
63%
DeepSeek R1 uses 28.0x more transitions
DeepSeek R1
MiMo-V2-Pro
62%Vocabulary66%
15wSentence Length18w
0.52Hedging0.59
8.0Bold7.3
5.7Lists4.8
0.04Emoji0.45
0.62Headings1.42
0.28Transitions0.00
Based on 22 + 14 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
