DeepSeek R1 vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare DeepSeek R1 by DeepSeek against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 2 community votes, deepseek r1 and qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 are closely matched, context windows of 128K vs 131K, tested across 54 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Winner
DeepSeek R1Runner-up
Votes are tied. Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is newer and likely incorporates more recent improvements.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 3.6x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek R1
Input
$0.55
Output
$2.19
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
5.0× cheaper
Output
$0.60
3.6× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 5.0× input, 3.6× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
58%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 12.5x more emoji
DeepSeek R1
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
62%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length14w
0.52Hedging0.37
8.0Bold5.7
5.7Lists4.0
0.04Emoji0.54
0.62Headings0.70
0.28Transitions0.14
Based on 22 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
