Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek R1vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Updated Jul 2025

DeepSeek R1vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than DeepSeek R1 at $0.11/M vs $0.55/M input tokens.

DeepSeek R1 and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 compared across 54 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek R1Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input price$0.55/M tokens$0.11/M tokens
Output price$2.19/M tokens$0.6/M tokens
Context window128K tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedFeb 2025Jul 2025
Our Verdict
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
DeepSeek R1
DeepSeek R1Runner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has the edge: bigger model tier, newer.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 3.6x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek R1
Input
$0.55
Output
$2.19
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
5.0× cheaper
Output
$0.60
3.6× cheaper

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 5.0× input, 3.6× output.

Where to run it

4 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek R11 host
HostInOutContextUptime
NNovitafp8$0.70 in·$2.50 out·64k·100% up
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Alibaba Cloud$0.23 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% upNNovitafp8$0.30 in·$3.00 out·131k·98.8% upVVenicefp8$0.45 in·$3.50 out·128k·95.2% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
62%

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 3.7x more emoji

DeepSeek R1
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
64%Vocabulary56%
15wSentence Length15w
0.48Hedging0.42
7.2Bold6.1
4.9Lists4.3
0.27Emoji0.99
0.57Headings0.70
0.25Transitions0.13
Based on 28 + 28 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoOx Alpha logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoMiniMax M3 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs MiniMax M3New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoClaude Opus 4.1 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Claude Opus 4.1New provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGrok 3 logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 3New provider
DeepSeek R1 logoGrok 3 Beta logo
DeepSeek R1 vs Grok 3 BetaNew provider
DeepSeek R1 logoGrok 3 Mini Beta logo
DeepSeek R1 vs Grok 3 Mini BetaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Grok 3 ThinkingNew provider
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed