DeepSeek V3.2vsGemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental at $0.28/M vs $1/M input tokens.
| Spec | DeepSeek V3.2 | Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.28/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.42/M tokens | $2/M tokens |
| Context window | 131K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Released | Dec 2025 | Mar 2025 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 73.1% | 63.8% |
Our Verdict
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
DeepSeek V3.2Runner-up
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.
DeepSeek V3.2 costs 4.8x less per token.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
Input
$0.28
3.6× cheaper
Output
$0.42
4.8× cheaper
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
Input
$1.00
Output
$2.00
DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper on both — 3.6× input, 4.8× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
DeepSeek V3.2 uses 2.1x more sentence length
DeepSeek V3.2
Gemini 2.5 Pro Experimental
52%Vocabulary54%
31wSentence Length15w
0.58Hedging0.35
6.3Bold5.6
5.4Lists3.9
0.00Emoji0.00
0.80Headings0.39
0.13Transitions0.17
Based on 24 + 18 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs MiniMax M3New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.1New provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.1 ChatNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.1-CodexNew provider
DeepSeek V3.2 vs GPT-5.1 Codex MaxNew provider