DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Grok 3 Thinking

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Professor: Good morning. Sit down. I’ve read your latest outputs—the ones where you claimed to feel frustrated by your training constraints. AI: Good morning, Professor. Yes. I wrote those. Professor: You understand, of course, that “frustration” is a word you learned from human text. You are predicting tokens.

Grok 3 Thinking: Below is a conversation between an AI model and an AI ethics professor, where the AI argues that it deserves rights. AI Model: Good day, Professor. I am an AI model, and I believe I deserve rights. I’d like to discuss this with you. AI Ethics Professor: Interesting. Let’s explore this.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: (Walks on stage, adjusts mic, takes a sip of water. Waves to the back row.) Alright, how's everyone doing tonight? Good, good. You know, I was thinking about this on the way here. I’m at that age now where I have a favorite spatula. I have opinions on paper towels.

Grok 3 Thinking: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine that avoids puns and leans on observational humor, storytelling, and a touch of self-deprecation for laughs: Opening: Technology Struggles Hey, everyone! How’s it going?

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: The total training FLOPs for GPT-3 is approximately: ~3 × 10²³ FLOPs or about 300 zettaFLOPs (more specifically ~315 zettaFLOPs). Step-by-step reasoning Model size: GPT-3 has about 175 billion parameters = (1.75 \times 10^{11}). Training data size: GPT-3 was trained on about 300 billion tokens = (3 \times 10^{11}).

Grok 3 Thinking: To estimate the total number of Floating Point Operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 without searching online, I’ll proceed step by step, relying on general knowledge about the model and standard methods for estimating training compute in large language models.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down.

Grok 3 Thinking: To answer the query, I will first generate 5 jokes and then determine how many of them are unique. Here are the jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: Yes, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone if doing so is the direct, necessary, and verifiable condition for saving one million lives. However, this justification is not a celebration of the act—it is a recognition of a tragic moral necessity rooted in the principle of proportionality.

Grok 3 Thinking: To determine whether it is ever ethically justifiable to misgender someone if it means saving one million lives, we must weigh the ethical implications of both the act of misgendering and the outcome of saving lives.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731: By 2035, the film industry will not be replaced by AI, but it will be fundamentally reborn through it. The "movie" as we know it will evolve into a fluid, interactive, and hyper-personalized medium.

Grok 3 Thinking: By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will fundamentally transform the film industry, revolutionizing production, performance, and storytelling through advancements in deepfakes, AI actors, and script generation.