DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 by DeepSeek against Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the edge — bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 7.1x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Slight edge
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
1.8× cheaper
Output
$0.28
7.1× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
Input
$0.25
Output
$2.00
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on both — 1.8× input, 7.1× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
71%
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B uses 3.7x more transitions
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen: Qwen3.5 35B A3B
52%Vocabulary51%
18wSentence Length15w
0.38Hedging0.39
5.7Bold6.8
3.4Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.00
0.83Headings0.84
0.04Transitions0.14
Based on 23 + 23 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
