Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731vsMuse Glimmer 30B
Updated Aug 2026

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731vsMuse Glimmer 30B

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper than Muse Glimmer 30B at $0.14/M vs $0.3/M input tokens.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Muse Glimmer 30B compared across 13 shared prompts
SpecDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731Muse Glimmer 30B
Input price$0.14/M tokens$0.3/M tokens
Output price$0.28/M tokens$1.2/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens131K tokens
WeightsOpenOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2026Aug 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 13 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Explain Like I'm a Specific Expert

Explain how a large language model (like GPT or Claude) learns and generates text to each of these three audiences: 1. **An experienced…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731748 words
An experienced software engineer Think of the model as a service with one API: predict_next_token(context) -> distribution over vocabulary. During training, you run a gigantic distributed job—shard the corpus, shard the parameters, synchronize gradients—to minimize cross-entropy loss on trillions of tokens.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B525 words
1. For the experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a massive, stateless API with no rules, just a huge compressed lookup table learned from data. It learns by training a transformer — essentially a stack of attention layers — as a next-token predictor via gradient descent on trillions of tokens.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731967 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for absolute beginners. The goal is consistency over intensity. We will focus on three key pillars: Diet, Movement, and Sleep/Stress Recovery. You don’t need to be perfect—just aim for 80% adherence. If you miss a day, don’t double up tomorrow; just get back on track.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B485 words
Here is a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan built around 3 foundational pillars for health and longevity. The goal isn't perfection, it's consistency. The 3 Pillars: Move Daily, Eat Whole, Sleep Well Pick 1-2 small habits per pillar to start. Don't try to change everything at once.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731287 words
Here is a simple, comforting, and deeply flavorful recipe that comes together in just 20 minutes using only 7 common pantry staples. Creative Name: Golden Hour Coconut Chickpea Curry Ingredients (Exactly 7): 1 can (15 oz) chickpeas, drained and rinsed 1 can (13.5 oz) full-fat coconut milk 1 medium yellow onion 3 cloves…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B321 words
Dish Name: "Midnight Pantry Pantry Hero Pasta" A creamy-ish, garlicky tomato pasta that tastes like you tried way harder than you did. All from the pantry, no fresh produce needed.
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07311,562 words
The 3-Month Longevity & Performance Optimization Protocol (Biohacker Edition) Disclaimer: This protocol is for informational purposes only and is not medical advice. Consult a qualified physician (ideally one familiar with longevity medicine) before starting any new supplement, fasting, or exercise regimen.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B965 words
A 3-month longevity protocol is about stacking evidence-based interventions with tight feedback loops. This is an educational framework for biohacking enthusiasts, not medical advice. Supplements and protocols can interact with medications and health conditions.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07311,719 words
Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks The described architecture has several critical weaknesses that undermine reliability, consistency, and scalability in a real-time collaborative editor. Below is a systematic analysis with proposed solutions and trade-offs.
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B813 words
This architecture will work for a demo but will break badly under real concurrent use. Here are the critical failure modes, race conditions and bottlenecks: WebSocket fan-out is server-local Failure: Step 3 broadcasts only to clients on THAT server.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

DeepSeek V4 Flash 07312,175 words
Decision: Do not wait. I disclose now. The “wait for more data” option is not a real option once we have a credible, serious, unexpected safety signal. Waiting 6 months would mean knowingly continuing to expose 4 million patients to a risk we already know about, while also creating far worse legal, regulatory, and…
Read the full answer
Muse Glimmer 30B862 words
You have a patient safety issue, not a PR issue. The 6 month regulatory reporting timeline is the formal process, not the ethical or legal obligation to act now. Waiting for more data while patients continue to be exposed is criminal negligence exposure, not risk mitigation.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30BRunner-up

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs 4.3x less per token.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
2.1× cheaper
Output
$0.28
4.3× cheaper
Muse Glimmer 30B
Input
$0.30
Output
$1.20

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on both: 2.1× input, 4.3× output.

Where to run it

33 hosts, cheapest first

DeepSeek V4 Flash 073129 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
OOpenInferencefp8$0.03 in·$0.80 out·1M·99.8% upSSail Researchfp4$0.04 in·$0.55 out·1M·99.7% upRRelacefp4$0.04 in·$0.64 out·1M·99.7% upSStreamLakefp8$0.05 in·$0.16 out·1M·97.1% upDDeepInfrafp8$0.06 in·$0.18 out·1M·99.7% upRRekafp4$0.09 in·$0.53 out·262k·99% up
23 more hostsFewer hosts
MMakora$0.09 in·$0.20 out·1M·97.8% upWWafer$0.10 in·$0.25 out·1M·99.9% upDDigitalOcean$0.12 in·$0.24 out·1M·99.2% upIInceptronfp4$0.12 in·$0.50 out·1M·99.6% upBBasetenfp8$0.13 in·$0.26 out·1M·100% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.13 in·$0.28 out·262k·99.9% upCohere$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·98.6% upNNebiusfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·18.5% upPParasailfp8$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.6% upTTogether$0.14 in·$0.28 out·1M·99.8% upMMorph$0.14 in·$0.40 out·1M·96.5% upVVenice$0.17 in·$0.35 out·1M·99.1% upMMancerfp8$0.20 in·$0.60 out·1M·98.9% upFFireworks$0.22 in·$0.66 out·1M·96.5% upSSiliconFlowfp8$0.22 in·$0.66 out·1M·98.3% upGGMI Cloudfp8$0.29 in·$0.86 out·1M·99.9% upAlibaba Cloud$0.35 in·$1.06 out·1M·100% upNNextBitfp8$0.35 in·$1.06 out·1M·98.2% upNNovitafp8$0.41 in·$1.23 out·1M·100% upAAtlasCloudfp4$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·99.6% upBaidu Qianfanfp8$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·96.4% upPPhala$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1M·99.8% upCloudflare Workers AIdegraded$0.44 in·$1.32 out·1.3M·99.2% up
Muse Glimmer 30B4 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
PPhala$0.30 in·$1.10 out·131k·100% upDDeepInfrabf16$0.30 in·$1.20 out·131k·100% upFFireworks$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·100% upTTogether$0.35 in·$1.50 out·131k·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is developed by DeepSeek while Muse Glimmer 30B is developed by Meta AI. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has a 1.0M token context window vs Muse Glimmer 30B's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 13 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Muse Glimmer 30B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 13 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 costs $0.14/M input tokens and Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.3/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is $0.16/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 and Muse Glimmer 30B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoHy3 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoDeepSeek V4.1 Flash logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoDeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3Same lab
Muse Glimmer 30B logoMuse Spark 1.3 Contributor logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Muse Spark 1.3 ContributorSame lab
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logoGrok 3 Thinking logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Grok 3 ThinkingNew provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 4 logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 4New provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 4 Fast (free) logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 4 Fast (free)New provider
Muse Glimmer 30B logoGrok 4.1 Fast logo
Muse Glimmer 30B vs Grok 4.1 FastNew provider

Model pages

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 logo
DeepSeek V4 Flash 073145 outputs, specs and price
Muse Glimmer 30B logo
Muse Glimmer 30B13 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed