DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Compare DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 by DeepSeek against Qwen3.5 122B A10B by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 262K, tested across 42 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen3.5 122B A10BRunner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is 11x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Input
$0.14
2.9× cheaper
Output
$0.28
11× cheaper
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
Input
$0.40
Output
$3.20
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 is cheaper on both — 2.9× input, 11× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
70%
Qwen3.5 122B A10B uses 10.4x more emoji
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731
Qwen3.5 122B A10B
52%Vocabulary49%
18wSentence Length15w
0.38Hedging0.29
5.7Bold6.2
3.4Lists4.8
0.00Emoji0.10
0.83Headings0.88
0.04Transitions0.20
Based on 23 + 24 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
