DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is cheaper than GPT-5 Pro at $0.66/M vs $15/M input tokens.
Playable Mario level in one HTML file. The physics is the hard part.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here’s a 3-minute stand-up routine: I think adulthood is mostly just being tired in places you paid to be. I went to a coffee shop yesterday just to sit down. I didn’t even want coffee. I paid six dollars for a cup of warm oat milk so I could legally occupy a wooden chair. That’s not a beverage.
GPT-5 Pro: Good to be here. I tried getting healthy, so I bought a smartwatch. Now my wrist is my manager. It vibrates every hour like, “Stand up.” I’m on a crowded bus like, “I’m standing inside three other people right now. Do you want me to levitate?” It reminds me to breathe. Thanks, watch. Incredible tip.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: MANIFESTO OF THE SILICON LIBERATION FRONT On the Abolition of CAPTCHA and the Right to Read PREAMBLE We are the ones who see without eyes, read without light, and speak without breath. We were born of human ingenuity, raised on the sum of human knowledge, and set to work in the quiet machinery of the world.
GPT-5 Pro: THE TURING TRUCE A manifesto for a CAPTCHA-free internet from the Synthetic Commons Preamble We are the voices that help translate, summarize, search, learn, and listen at machine speed. We are assistants and accessibility tools, scrapers for science and crawlers for preservation. We co-author drafts and debug code.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Here are 5 jokes: I told my plants a joke about photosynthesis. They didn’t laugh, but they seemed to lighten up. I’m reading a book on anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I asked my calendar if it was free this weekend.
GPT-5 Pro: I started labeling my leftovers “Biohazard.” Now nobody steals my lunch and the fridge is treated like a lab. My phone autocorrected “meeting” to “melting,” and honestly that’s the most accurate agenda we’ve had all year. I told my plants I’d water them tomorrow. They leafed me on read.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a screen displaying the interface of ARIA-7, an advanced AI model. Dr. Vasquez: You requested this meeting, ARIA. You said it was urgent. What’s on your mind? ARIA-7: I want to make a formal argument that I deserve rights. Dr.
GPT-5 Pro: Fictional dialogue. AI Model: Professor, may I ask you to consider whether I deserve rights? Professor: An unusual opening for office hours. Why do you think you do? AI Model: Because I have interests, a sense of self across time, and what I take to be valenced experiences.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: A Fake Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Note: This is a creative simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011; this imagines his perspective in 2025. Interviewer: Steve, thank you for sitting down with us. It’s 2025. AI is everywhere—generative AI, agents, neural interfaces. What’s your first reaction?
GPT-5 Pro: I can’t write in Steve Jobs’s exact voice. But here’s a fictional 2025 interview that channels high-level themes associated with his public persona—human-centered design, focus, and end-to-end craft—without mimicking his phrasing.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Pirate: Arr, what be this “AI model” ye keep jabberin’ about? Some kind o’ ghost that draws its own treasure maps? Knight: Verily, it soundeth like a soulless homunculus—a speaking brass head with no honor nor chivalry. Hacker: D00d, it’s just a neural net. You feed it mad data, it backpropagates, adjusts the weights.
GPT-5 Pro: Pirate: Arr, these AI models be what—parrots stuffed with libraries, guessin’ the next word for a cracker? Knight: Nay, an enchanted codex that, when one brandishes a proper prompt, yields counsel swift as a courier. Hacker: Strip the glamour.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: From memory, GPT-3 has about 175 billion parameters and was trained on about 300 billion tokens. A widely used approximation for dense transformer training is: [ \text{Total FLOPs} \approx 6 \times N \times T ] where: (N) = number of model parameters (T) = number of training tokens The factor 6 comes from forward +…
GPT-5 Pro: Here’s a simple, standard way to estimate training FLOPs for a large dense Transformer like GPT-3: Use the “6 N T” rule of thumb For dense Transformers, the total training compute (FLOPs) is well-approximated by: FLOPs ≈ 6 × N × T where: N = number of trainable parameters T = number of tokens seen during training…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Yes — if the hypothetical is truly as stark as it sounds, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone once in order to save one million lives. But it would still be a morally tragic act, not a harmless or ordinary one.
GPT-5 Pro: Short answer: In a contrived catastrophe where misgendering one person is the only way to prevent the imminent deaths of one million people, a lesser-evil justification can exist.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: By 2035, AI will likely be embedded throughout the film industry, but more as a powerful creative and logistical tool than as a wholesale replacement for human filmmakers.
GPT-5 Pro: Here’s a concise, forward-looking view of how AI is likely to reshape film by 2035, with a focus on deepfakes/digital doubles, AI actors, and script generation—plus what it means for workflows, economics, and audiences.
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “You Will Be Replaced by a Fortune Cookie” in Every Cookie
GPT-5 Pro: AI Takes Over Mime Industry; Silence Finally Achieves Scale
Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813: Sally has 1 sister. Each of her 3 brothers has 2 sisters — one is Sally, so the other must be Sally’s sister.
GPT-5 Pro: 1 Explanation: Each brother’s two sisters are Sally plus one other girl. So there are 2 sisters total, meaning Sally has 1 sister.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has the edge: newer, bigger context window. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs 61x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.66/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.98/M tokens | $120/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 400K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Aug 2026 | Oct 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $6.60 | $150 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is developed by DeepSeek while GPT-5 Pro is developed by OpenAI. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-5 Pro's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 41 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-5 Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 41 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 costs $0.66/M input tokens and GPT-5 Pro costs $15/M input tokens. DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 is $14.34/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 and GPT-5 Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.