What is the difference between ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3.6 Flash?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B is developed by Baidu while Qwen3.6 Flash is developed by Qwen. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B has a 123K token context window vs Qwen3.6 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B or Qwen3.6 Flash?

It depends on your use case. ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3.6 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B cost compared to Qwen3.6 Flash?

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B costs $0.28/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 Flash costs $0.25/M input tokens. Qwen3.6 Flash is $0.03/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3.6 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3.6 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Apr 2026

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BvsQwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper than ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B at $0.25/M vs $0.28/M input tokens.

ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B and Qwen3.6 Flash compared across 54 shared prompts
Spec	ERNIE 4.5 300B A47B	Qwen3.6 Flash
Input price	$0.28/M tokens	$0.25/M tokens
Output price	$1.1/M tokens	$1.5/M tokens
Context window	123K tokens	1.0M tokens
Weights	Open	Open
Free API (OpenRouter)	No	No
Released	Jun 2025	Apr 2026