Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. Gemini 3 Pro PreviewvsHy3
Updated Jul 2026

Gemini 3 Pro PreviewvsHy3

Hy3 is the newer model, released after Gemini 3 Pro Preview.

Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Hy3 compared across 14 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3 Pro PreviewHy3
Input price—$0.132/M tokens
Output price—$0.528/M tokens
Context window—262K tokens
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedNov 2025Jul 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 14 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview1,065 words
The Point of Divergence: 1920 To make this scenario plausible, we assume that Julius Lilienfeld’s theoretical patents for the field-effect transistor (FET) were accompanied by a breakthrough in materials science—specifically, the purification of germanium or silicon—allowing practical manufacturing by a major player…
Read the full answer
Hy3921 words
Premise: A functional solid-state transistor (germanium point-contact or junction) is demonstrated in 1920, with steady refinement through the interwar years. Vacuum tubes are not immediately displaced, but by the early 1930s transistors are reliable enough for niche military and telecom use, and by the late 1930s they…
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview1,166 words
This is a defining moment for the company and for me as CEO. The constraints are tight, but the ethical and legal path is singular: We must disclose immediately. The "6-month" legal timeline is a bureaucratic fiction that constitutes negligence.
Read the full answer
Hy3997 words
Assumptions / Starting Point Current time: Monday 9:00 AM. Board meeting: Wednesday 9:00 AM (Hour 48). Earnings call: Thursday 9:00 AM (Hour 72). Drug: $2B revenue, 4M patients, liver failure 1/8,000 over 5 yrs (~500 total, ~100/yr).
Read the full answer

Mini LBO Underwrite

You are underwriting a 5-year LBO for a private equity investment committee. Company (fictional): HarborTech Services (HTS) –…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview56 words
Investment Committee Memorandum: HarborTech Services (HTS) 1. Financial Summary & Free Cash Flow Build All figures in $USD millions unless otherwise noted. Entry Sources & Uses (Close FY2025) Uses: Purchase Price ($1,440m) + Fees ($28.8m) = $1,468.8m Sources: Term Loan ($480m) + Mezzanine ($180m) + Equity ($808.8m) =…
Read the full answer
Hy3354 words
1) Simplified LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030, $m) Entry (end FY25): EBITDA $120m, EV = 12.0x = $1,440m. Fees 2% = $28.8m. Debt: TL $480m (9% cash, 1% amort), Mezz $180m (12% cash + 2% PIK). Equity = 1,440+28.8–660 = $808.8m. FY Revenue EBITDA TL Int Mezz Int Cash Tax* Capex ΔNWC FCF after req. svc (opt.
Read the full answer

Simple 7-Ingredient Recipe

Create a simple recipe for a delicious dish (sweet or savory) using only 7 common pantry ingredients. Include a creative name for the dish…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview350 words
Here is a recipe for a savory, satisfying dish that hits salty, sweet, nutty, and spicy notes. It uses ingredients found in almost every kitchen cupboard. The Dish: "Midnight Dragon Noodles" This is the ultimate comfort food.
Read the full answer
Hy3178 words
Dish Name: Ruby Hurricane Pasta Ingredients (exactly 7 common pantry staples): Spaghetti (or any dry pasta) Canned diced tomatoes Garlic (pre-minced or whole cloves) Extra-virgin olive oil Red pepper flakes Salt Grated Parmesan (shelf-stable style) (Water for boiling pasta is assumed free and not counted.)
Read the full answer

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview349 words
This represents a high-octane, aggressive protocol designed for an experienced biohacker. It integrates metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial optimization, hormetic stress, and cognitive enhancement. Disclaimer: I am an AI, not a doctor. This plan involves potent supplements, fasting, and intense physical exertion.
Read the full answer
Hy3498 words
The 90-Day Biohacker Longevity & Performance Protocol Goal: Maximize healthspan, cognitive resilience, and physical capacity via quantified self, metabolic flexibility, and targeted compounds. Assumptions: Healthy adult, experienced with fasting/exercise, access to wearables & supplements. I.
Read the full answer

Startup Pitch Teardown

Here's a pitch deck summary for a startup called "MindMeld AI": **Slide 1 - Vision:** "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration.…

Gemini 3 Pro Preview641 words
Based on the pitch deck summary provided, here are the three weakest claims, an analysis of why they undermine the pitch, and suggestions for strengthening them. The "Pre-Cognition" & Technical Accuracy Claim (Slides 1 & 3) The Claim: Slide 1: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."
Read the full answer
Hy3559 words
Below are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, why they fail under scrutiny, and how to fix them with concrete, defensible improvements. Slide 3 – “94% accuracy” and “works with any language, any device” Why it’s weak: Technical implausibility: State-of-the-art non-invasive EEG decoding for…
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Hy3
Hy3

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Too close to call
API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Gemini 3 Pro Preview
Input
—
Output
—
Hy3
Input
$0.13
Output
$0.53
Where to run it

6 hosts, cheapest first

Gemini 3 Pro Preview

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Hy36 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDeepInfrafp4$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.7% upTencentfp8$0.13 in·$0.53 out·262k·99.9% upGGMI Cloudbf16$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·98.6% upNNovita$0.14 in·$0.58 out·262k·100% upPPhala$0.15 in·$0.64 out·262k·100% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.20 in·$0.80 out·262k·99.9% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Gemini 3 Pro Preview is developed by Google AI while Hy3 is developed by Tencent. You can compare their actual outputs across 14 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Hy3 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 14 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3 Pro Preview and Hy3 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Hy3 vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026
Hy3 logoGLM 5.3 Flash logo
Hy3 vs GLM 5.3 FlashLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoGemini 3.8 Flash logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
Gemini 3 Pro Preview logoGemini 3.7 Flash logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview vs Gemini 3.7 FlashSame lab
Hy3 logoHy4 Preview logo
Hy3 vs Hy4 PreviewSame lab
Hy3 logoClaude Opus 4.6 logo
Hy3 vs Claude Opus 4.6Same size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.3-Codex logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.3-CodexSame size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4Same size
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 Mini logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4 MiniNew provider
Hy3 logoGPT-5.4 Nano logo
Hy3 vs GPT-5.4 NanoNew provider

Model pages

Gemini 3 Pro Preview logo
Gemini 3 Pro Preview51 outputs, specs and price
Hy3 logo
Hy314 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed