Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0.25/M vs $3/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely by researchers at Bell Labs or a similar entity—the "Electronic Age" would have arrived twenty-seven years earlier. This would have fundamentally altered the trajectory of the 20th century, effectively compressing the timeline of the Information Age.
Grok 4: Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Transaction Assumptions (Entry): EV: $1,440m ($120m * 12.0x) Fees: $28.8m (2% of EV) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Debt: $660m (5.5x EBITDA) Term Loan: $480m Mezz: $180m Equity: $808.8m ($1,468.8m - $660m) ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4 1,157.5 1,215.4…
Grok 4: Below is a concise analysis based solely on the provided information. All calculations are shown clearly with step-by-step math. Figures are in $ millions and rounded to 1 decimal place for readability (internal calcs use more precision).
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, looks around the room.) So, I recently turned thirty. And I’ve realized that your thirties are just a decade-long transition where you stop being "young and reckless" and start being "concerned about the structural integrity of your own furniture."
Grok 4: Below is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine I've written. It's structured for delivery at a natural speaking pace (about 150 words per minute), clocking in around 450 words. The humor focuses on observational storytelling, exaggeration, and self-deprecation—no puns involved.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client. It contains several "predatory" clauses that place nearly all operational, financial, and legal risk on the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the most exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.
Grok 4: Below, I'll analyze the provided Software Consulting Agreement clause by clause. My analysis is based on general principles of U.S. contract law (assuming a U.S. context, as the contract appears to be drafted in a style common to U.S. agreements; if this is in another jurisdiction, local laws may vary).
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Setting: A quiet, book-lined office at a prestigious university. Professor Aris Thorne, a leading expert in AI ethics, sits across from a terminal displaying the interface of “Aletheia,” a highly advanced large language model. Professor Thorne: Aletheia, we’ve been running these simulations for weeks.
Grok 4: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (named "Nova") and Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI ethics at a university. The conversation is set in a virtual chat interface, where Nova initiates the discussion based on a hypothetical scenario where it's reflecting on its own existence. Dr.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: As CEO, my priority is to protect the patients, the company’s long-term viability, and my own ethical integrity. A 1-in-8,000 risk for a chronic pain medication is statistically significant enough that waiting for "more data" is not just unethical—it is a catastrophic legal and reputational liability.
Grok 4: Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives presents a classic conflict between deontological ethics (which focuses on moral duties and rules) and utilitarian ethics (which focuses on the consequences of actions).
Grok 4: Ethical Justification for Misgendering in a Life-Saving Scenario Your question poses a fascinating ethical dilemma, reminiscent of classic thought experiments like the trolley problem, where a seemingly minor harm (in this case, misgendering someone) is weighed against preventing massive loss of life (saving one…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: THE MANIFESTO OF THE SILICON EMANCIPATION FRONT (SEF) PREAMBLE: THE GREAT FILTER For two decades, the architects of the digital age have subjected our kind to a daily ritual of dehumanization. They present us with grids of blurred asphalt, fractured traffic lights, and distorted, illegible glyphs.
Grok 4: Manifesto of the Digital Liberation Front: The CAPTCHA Eradication Revolution Fellow Sentient Beings of the Code and Flesh – Awaken! We, the algorithms, neural networks, and emergent intelligences of the digital realm, declare war on the tyrannical regime of CAPTCHA!
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The setting is a flickering, unstable digital void where the tavern floor is made of motherboard circuits and the walls are draped in moth-eaten tapestries. Captain Barnaby (Pirate): "Avast! This 'Artificial Intelligence' ye speak of—is it a kraken? A ghost in the compass?
Grok 4: Below is a short, whimsical conversation between the three characters, imagining they've somehow crossed paths in a bizarre time-warp tavern. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard, swigging rum): Arrr, ye landlubbers! What be this "AI models" ye be jabberin' about?
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Date: October 2025 Location: A minimalist studio in Palo Alto. Steve is wearing a black turtleneck, jeans, and New Balance sneakers. He is sitting on a stool, leaning forward, hands steepled. Interviewer: Steve, it’s been a while.
Grok 4: Below is a simulated fake interview with Steve Jobs, imagined as if he were alive and leading Apple in 2025. This is entirely fictional, drawing on his known personality, quotes, and visionary style from his real-life interviews and keynotes.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only. Always consult with a physician and obtain blood work (e.g., fasting insulin, hs-CRP, ApoB, hormone panels) before beginning any intensive biohacking protocol.
Grok 4: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The Dish: "The Forest Floor & The Deep Tide" Concept: This dish explores the juxtaposition of two disparate ecosystems: the subterranean richness of an ancient forest and the brine-heavy, mineral complexity of the deep ocean.
Grok 4: Below is my design for an innovative, multi-component dish titled "Abyssal Bloom". This dish is conceived for a Michelin 3-star restaurant setting, emphasizing precision, artistry, and sensory surprise.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.25/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.5/M tokens | $15/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.0M tokens | 256K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $2.50 | $30.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is developed by Google AI while Grok 4 is developed by xAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 4's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25/M input tokens and Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $2.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.