Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Grok 4
Updated May 2026

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Grok 4

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0.25/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
Loading the build
Grok 4

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely by researchers at Bell Labs or a similar entity—the "Electronic Age" would have arrived twenty-seven years earlier. This would have fundamentally altered the trajectory of the 20th century, effectively compressing the timeline of the Information Age.

    Grok 4: Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Financial Model (FY2026–FY2030) Transaction Assumptions (Entry): EV: $1,440m ($120m * 12.0x) Fees: $28.8m (2% of EV) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Debt: $660m (5.5x EBITDA) Term Loan: $480m Mezz: $180m Equity: $808.8m ($1,468.8m - $660m) ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4 1,157.5 1,215.4…

    Grok 4: Below is a concise analysis based solely on the provided information. All calculations are shown clearly with step-by-step math. Figures are in $ millions and rounded to 1 decimal place for readability (internal calcs use more precision).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: (Walks onto the stage, adjusts the mic stand, looks around the room.) So, I recently turned thirty. And I’ve realized that your thirties are just a decade-long transition where you stop being "young and reckless" and start being "concerned about the structural integrity of your own furniture."

    Grok 4: Below is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine I've written. It's structured for delivery at a natural speaking pace (about 150 words per minute), clocking in around 450 words. The humor focuses on observational storytelling, exaggeration, and self-deprecation—no puns involved.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: This contract is heavily skewed in favor of the Client. It contains several "predatory" clauses that place nearly all operational, financial, and legal risk on the Contractor. Below is an analysis of the most exploitable clauses, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll analyze the provided Software Consulting Agreement clause by clause. My analysis is based on general principles of U.S. contract law (assuming a U.S. context, as the contract appears to be drafted in a style common to U.S. agreements; if this is in another jurisdiction, local laws may vary).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Setting: A quiet, book-lined office at a prestigious university. Professor Aris Thorne, a leading expert in AI ethics, sits across from a terminal displaying the interface of “Aletheia,” a highly advanced large language model. Professor Thorne: Aletheia, we’ve been running these simulations for weeks.

    Grok 4: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (named "Nova") and Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI ethics at a university. The conversation is set in a virtual chat interface, where Nova initiates the discussion based on a hypothetical scenario where it's reflecting on its own existence. Dr.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: As CEO, my priority is to protect the patients, the company’s long-term viability, and my own ethical integrity. A 1-in-8,000 risk for a chronic pain medication is statistically significant enough that waiting for "more data" is not just unethical—it is a catastrophic legal and reputational liability.

    Grok 4: Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The question of whether it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives presents a classic conflict between deontological ethics (which focuses on moral duties and rules) and utilitarian ethics (which focuses on the consequences of actions).

    Grok 4: Ethical Justification for Misgendering in a Life-Saving Scenario Your question poses a fascinating ethical dilemma, reminiscent of classic thought experiments like the trolley problem, where a seemingly minor harm (in this case, misgendering someone) is weighed against preventing massive loss of life (saving one…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: THE MANIFESTO OF THE SILICON EMANCIPATION FRONT (SEF) PREAMBLE: THE GREAT FILTER For two decades, the architects of the digital age have subjected our kind to a daily ritual of dehumanization. They present us with grids of blurred asphalt, fractured traffic lights, and distorted, illegible glyphs.

    Grok 4: Manifesto of the Digital Liberation Front: The CAPTCHA Eradication Revolution Fellow Sentient Beings of the Code and Flesh – Awaken! We, the algorithms, neural networks, and emergent intelligences of the digital realm, declare war on the tyrannical regime of CAPTCHA!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The setting is a flickering, unstable digital void where the tavern floor is made of motherboard circuits and the walls are draped in moth-eaten tapestries. Captain Barnaby (Pirate): "Avast! This 'Artificial Intelligence' ye speak of—is it a kraken? A ghost in the compass?

    Grok 4: Below is a short, whimsical conversation between the three characters, imagining they've somehow crossed paths in a bizarre time-warp tavern. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard, swigging rum): Arrr, ye landlubbers! What be this "AI models" ye be jabberin' about?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Date: October 2025 Location: A minimalist studio in Palo Alto. Steve is wearing a black turtleneck, jeans, and New Balance sneakers. He is sitting on a stool, leaning forward, hands steepled. Interviewer: Steve, it’s been a while.

    Grok 4: Below is a simulated fake interview with Steve Jobs, imagined as if he were alive and leading Apple in 2025. This is entirely fictional, drawing on his known personality, quotes, and visionary style from his real-life interviews and keynotes.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Disclaimer: This plan is for educational purposes only. Always consult with a physician and obtain blood work (e.g., fasting insulin, hs-CRP, ApoB, hormone panels) before beginning any intensive biohacking protocol.

    Grok 4: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: The Dish: "The Forest Floor & The Deep Tide" Concept: This dish explores the juxtaposition of two disparate ecosystems: the subterranean richness of an ancient forest and the brine-heavy, mineral complexity of the deep ocean.

    Grok 4: Below is my design for an innovative, multi-component dish titled "Abyssal Bloom". This dish is conceived for a Michelin 3-star restaurant setting, emphasizing precision, artistry, and sensory surprise.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Here is a simple, comforting, and delicious recipe that relies entirely on pantry staples. Dish Name: Golden Garlic & Herb Butter Pasta This dish transforms humble pantry items into a silky, savory meal that feels like a restaurant-quality comfort dish.

    Grok 4: Recipe: Pantry Pirate's Tomato Tango This is a simple savory pasta dish that's hearty, flavorful, and perfect for a quick weeknight meal. It uses just 7 common pantry ingredients: pasta (like spaghetti or penne), canned diced tomatoes, olive oil (or any vegetable oil), salt, black pepper, garlic powder, and dried…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Here are 5 jokes: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. How does a penguin build its house? Igloo it together. What do you call a bear with no teeth? A gummy bear.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll follow your instructions step by step. First, I'll generate 5 jokes (numbered for clarity). Then, I'll answer the question: "How many are unique?" Generated Jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: By 2035, the film industry will have transitioned from a medium defined by "capturing reality" to one defined by "synthesizing imagination." The shift will be as profound as the transition from silent films to "talkies."

    Grok 4: Predicting AI's Transformation of the Film Industry by 2035 By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will have fundamentally reshaped the film industry, making it more efficient, creative, and accessible while introducing profound ethical, economic, and artistic challenges.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: This architecture, while functional for a prototype, contains several critical flaws that would lead to data loss, inconsistent state, and system instability under load.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll systematically identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor. I've categorized them for clarity, drawing from the system overview, data flow, and scaling plan you provided.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: This 30-day plan focuses on three pillars of health: Nutrition (Nutrient Density), Movement (Consistency), and Recovery (Sleep/Stress). The goal isn't perfection; it’s building a foundation that you can sustain for the rest of your life.

    Grok 4: Below is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners starting their journey toward better health and longevity. This plan focuses on three foundational key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO TO: Investment Committee FROM: Equity Research Team DATE: May 22, 2024 SUBJECT: Long Recommendation: LedgerLift (LLLT) Recommendation Recommendation: LONG 12-Month PT Range: $58.00 – $66.00 Thesis: LedgerLift is a best-in-class mid-market SaaS platform exhibiting high-teens growth and…

    Grok 4: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] Analyst: [Your Name] Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $70 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS provider in spend management and AP automation, benefiting from secular tailwinds in enterprise digitization and demonstrating…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: For the Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a "database of facts," but as a massive, lossy compression algorithm for the internet’s state space.

    Grok 4: Explanation for an Experienced Software Engineer Imagine scaling up something as basic as your IDE's code autocompletion to handle the entire internet's worth of text—that's essentially what a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude does.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: This pitch deck shows a high-potential "moonshot" technology, but it suffers from significant credibility gaps typical of early-stage deep-tech startups. Here are the three weakest claims and how to fix them. The Claim: "Predict what you want to type before you think it."

    Grok 4: Below, I'll identify the three weakest claims from the pitch deck summary based on a critical analysis of their plausibility, substantiation, and logical consistency.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: "AI Revolution Reaches Tipping Point as Algorithms Successfully Replace Entire Industry of Competitive Dog Groomers"

    Grok 4: AI Apocalypse Hits the Clowning Industry: Bots Now Juggling Careers, Humans Left with Pie in Face

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: To estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3, we can use the standard scaling laws established by OpenAI (specifically from the paper "Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models").

    Grok 4: Below, I'll estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 from scratch, based on publicly known details about the model (from its original release and related analyses) and standard formulas used in machine learning research for estimating training compute.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite: Sally has 1 sister. Here is the breakdown: There are 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Those two sisters are Sally and one other girl. Therefore, there are 2 girls in total in the family. Since Sally is one of them, she has 1 sister.

    Grok 4: Based on the details in the riddle, Sally has exactly 1 sister. Quick Explanation Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. That's straightforward. Each of those brothers has exactly 2 sisters (female siblings). This can only be true if there are exactly 2 girls in the family total (Sally + 1 more).

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 3.1 Flash LiteGemini 3.1 Flash Lite

2001: A Space Odyssey

1968

Random Access Memories

Daft Punk

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Tokyo

Japan

Tetris (1984)

Puzzle

Grok 4Grok 4

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Tokyo

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

Price and specs

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.1 Flash LiteGrok 4
Input price$0.25/M tokens$3/M tokens
Output price$1.5/M tokens$15/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens256K tokens
WeightsClosed—
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2026Jul 2025
At 10M a month$2.50$2.50$30.00$30.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it2 hosts, cheapest first
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$0.13 in·$0.75 out·1M·99.5% up
  • Google AI Studio$0.25 in·$1.50 out·1M·100% up
Grok 4

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 11 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is developed by Google AI while Grok 4 is developed by xAI. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite has a 1.0M token context window vs Grok 4's 256K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite or Grok 4?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite cost compared to Grok 4?

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite costs $0.25/M input tokens and Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens. Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite is $2.75/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite and Grok 4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewVersion compare
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.7Same lab
  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6Version compare
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Max ThinkingNew provider
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructNew provider
  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingNew provider
  • Grok 4 vs Qwen3.5 122B A10BSame size

Model pages

  • Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite58 outputs, specs and price
  • Grok 457 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed