Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google AI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, context windows of 1.0M vs 131K, tested across 53 shared challenges.
Our Verdict
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Runner-up
No community votes yet. On paper, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has the edge — newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 20x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Too close to call
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Input
$2.00
Output
$12.00
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
18× cheaper
Output
$0.60
20× cheaper
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both — 18× input, 20× output
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
53%
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 53.9x more emoji
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length14w
0.29Hedging0.37
4.9Bold5.7
3.3Lists4.0
0.00Emoji0.54
0.72Headings0.70
0.14Transitions0.14
Based on 23 + 22 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
