Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4
Updated Aug 2026

Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-4

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper than GPT-4 at $0.375/M vs $30/M input tokens.

Mario Level UI Recreation

Playable Mario level in one HTML file. The physics is the hard part.

Loading the build
Gemini 3.7 Flash
Loading the build
GPT-4

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

10 prompts
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: 3-Month Precision Longevity & Human Optimization Masterplan This protocol is engineered for an advanced biohacker. It integrates metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial biogenesis, cellular cleanup (autophagy/senescence clearance), epigenetic modulation, neurovascular enhancement, and autonomic nervous system regulation.

    GPT-4: 3-Month Longevity Plan Dietary Protocols Month 1: Ketogenic Diet This diet is high in fats, moderate in protein, and low in carbohydrates. It helps in burning fat more effectively. Breakfast: 2 eggs, avocado, and mixed vegetables. Lunch: Grilled salmon with a side of asparagus. Dinner: Stir-fried chicken with broccoli.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Executive Stance & Strategic Philosophy As CEO, the guiding principle is simple: Patient safety and regulatory integrity are non-negotiable. A rate of 1 in 8,000 over 5 years across 4 million patients translates to roughly 500 cases of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) or acute liver failure.

    GPT-4: Day 1: 8 AM-10 AM: Convene an emergency meeting with your core leadership team. This team includes the heads of Legal, Regulatory Affairs, Medical, Research and Development, Finance, and Communications. Brief them on the situation and ask for their initial input and strategies for managing the situation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: To the Experienced Software Engineer At its core, a Large Language Model is not a sentient entity; it is a compiled, highly optimized functional pipeline executing a deterministic set of matrix multiplications over a sequence of integers (tokens). Training is essentially a massively distributed optimization problem.

    GPT-4: Experienced Software Engineer: How does a language model like GPT produce intelligent behavior? Think of it as a highly specialized function in your code. This function has been trained on a large amount of text data, and it's main goal is to predict the next word in a sentence given the previous words.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: If the transistor had been invented in 1920—likely as an empirical discovery in solid-state physics using point-contact crystals (similar to Julius Lilienfeld’s real-world 1925 theoretical patents, but made fully functional)—it would have compressed modern technological history by nearly three decades.

    GPT-4: An early invention of the transistor in 1920 would have had profound implications across numerous domains, drastically altering the course of history. Technological Implications: WWII: The transistor, a fundamental component of modern electronic devices, could have advanced the technology used in WWII significantly.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: L’Ombre et L’Abîme (Shadow & The Abyss) Hay-Aged Bresse Squab, Hokkaido Sea Urchin Emulsion, Black Garlic–Koji Glaze, Cocoa Nib & Cuttlefish Ink Tuile, Forest Dashi I. Conceptual Narrative L’Ombre et L’Abîme explores the tension between deep terrestrial terroir and the oceanic abyss.

    GPT-4: Dish Name: Symphony of Scarlet Prawn and Yuzu Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a harmonious interplay of land and sea, with the sweetness of scarlet prawns, a gem of the deep sea, and the refreshing, fragrant citrus notes of yuzu fruit, a treasure from the land.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here is a simple, high-impact 1-Month Longevity Starter Plan. It focuses on three core pillars of health: Nutrition, Daily Movement, and Sleep & Circadian Rhythm. Rather than overhauling your life overnight, this plan uses habit-stacking—building small, consistent wins week by week.

    GPT-4: Title: 1-Month Plan for Better Health and Longevity Week 1 - Establishing a Healthy Diet 1.1: Start Eating Whole Foods: Begin by gradually replacing processed foods in your diet with whole foods. This may include fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: This contract is heavily one-sided ("draconian") and contains multiple high-risk clauses that could lead to non-payment, forfeiture of intellectual property, loss of livelihood, and catastrophic financial liability.

    GPT-4: SCOPE: The lack of specificity can be used against the contractor in that the client can modify the scope of work at will without renegotiating the price. This could lead to the contractor working beyond the initially agreed upon parameters without additional pay.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Dish Name: Midnight Garlic-Butter Silk Noodles A rich, savory, and slightly sweet bowl of glossy pasta tossed in caramelized garlic-butter and soy glaze, crowned with a crispy-edged, runny-yolk egg.

    GPT-4: Dish Name: Hearty Baked Beans Fiesta Ingredients: 2 cans of baked beans 1 large onion 3 cloves of garlic 1 bell pepper 1 can of sweet corn 2 tablespoons of olive oil Salt & pepper to taste Instructions: Preheat your oven to 350°F (175°C). Dice the onion, bell pepper, and mince the garlic.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here is an architectural analysis of the system, breaking down the critical failure modes, race conditions, and bottlenecks, along with concrete solutions and trade-offs for each. Conflict Resolution & Sync Flaws A.

    GPT-4: Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure: If PostgreSQL database fails, the whole system will be unavailable. Solution: Implement a multi-master or master-slave replication for the PostgreSQL database. This will provide redundancy and high availability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Gemini 3.7 Flash: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with an evaluation of why they undermine credibility and how to fix them. The Technical Feasibility Claim (Slide 3) The Claim: "Our proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy.

    GPT-4: Weak Claim 1 - Solution: While the claim that the proprietary EEG headband uses advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy is impressive, it doesn't address concerns about user comfort, ease of use, or aesthetics.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

Favorites

Movie

Same pick

Album

Same pick

Book

City

Same pick

Game

Gemini 3.7 FlashGemini 3.7 Flash

Blade Runner

1982

OK Computer

Radiohead

Frankenstein; or, The Modern Prometheus

Mary Shelley

Tokyo

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

GPT-4GPT-4

Blade Runner

1982

OK Computer

Radiohead

Gödel, Escher, Bach

Douglas R. Hofstadter

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4 compared across 26 shared prompts
SpecGemini 3.7 FlashGPT-4
Input price$0.375/M tokens$30/M tokens
Output price$1.875/M tokens$60/M tokens
Context window1.0M tokens8K tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedAug 2026May 2023
At 10M a month$3.75$3.75$300$300
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it4 hosts
Gemini 3.7 Flash2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Google Vertex AI$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·99.4% up
  • Google AI Studio$0.75 in·$3.75 out·1M·100% up
GPT-42 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$30.00 in·$60.00 out·8k·100% up
  • OpenAI$30.00 in·$60.00 out·8k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is developed by Google AI while GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI. Gemini 3.7 Flash has a 1.0M token context window vs GPT-4's 8K. You can compare their actual outputs across 26 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Gemini 3.7 Flash or GPT-4?

It depends on your use case. Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 26 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Gemini 3.7 Flash cost compared to GPT-4?

Gemini 3.7 Flash costs $0.375/M input tokens and GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens. Gemini 3.7 Flash is $29.63/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemini 3.7 Flash and GPT-4 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-4 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-4 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-4 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.6 FlashVersion compare
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 FlashSame lab
  • GPT-4 vs GPT-4o (Omni)Version compare
  • GPT-4 vs GPT-6.1 SolVersion compare
  • GPT-4 vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)New provider
  • GPT-4 vs Laguna XS 2.1 (free)New provider
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash vs LFM2.5-2.6BNew provider
  • GPT-4 vs Ling 2.6 1TSame size

Model pages

  • Gemini 3.7 Flash58 outputs, specs and price
  • GPT-426 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed