Gemma 3 27B is cheaper than Gemma 4 31B at $0.09/M vs $0.14/M input tokens.
Pokémon battle screen you can actually click. One HTML file.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
Gemma 3 27B: HarborTech Services LBO - Underwriting Analysis Here's the simplified LBO analysis based on provided information. 1) Year-by-Year Projections (FY2026-FY2030) - $M Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (TL) Cash Interest (Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Debt Service Ending TL Ending Mezz 2026 $972 $138.6 $36.0 $18.9…
Gemma 4 31B: LBO Model (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Calculations (End of FY2025): Enterprise Value (EV): $120m × 12.0x = $1,440.0m Transaction Fees: $1,440m × 2% = $28.8m Term Loan: $120m × 4.0x = $480.0m Mezzanine: $120m × 1.5x = $180.0m Sponsor Equity: $1,440m - ($480m + $180m) + $28.8m = $808.8m Year-by-Year Table ($ millions): Item…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
Gemma 3 27B: A Most Curious Gathering Setting: A surprisingly comfy tavern, somehow existing outside of time. Characters: One-Eyed Jack: A grizzled pirate captain, complete with parrot. Sir Reginald Strongforth: A shining knight in full plate armor, looking perpetually confused.
Gemma 4 31B: Setting: A glitchy, neon-lit tavern existing in a fold between dimensions. A wooden table holds a tankard of ale, a goblet of wine, and a Mountain Dew. Captain Ironbeard: (Slamming a hook on the table) I tells ye, this "Artificial Intelligence" be naught but a ghost in a bottle!
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
Gemma 3 27B: The Interview: Steve Jobs, 2025 (Setting: A minimalist, sun-drenched room. Polished concrete floors, a single, perfectly placed bonsai tree. Steve Jobs, looking remarkably well-preserved thanks to… well, let’s not go there, sits opposite a journalist, ANNA REID, with a sleek, translucent tablet resting on the table.
Gemma 4 31B: Setting: A minimalist, white-walled studio in Cupertino. There are no chairs, only two sleek, black leather lounge seats. Steve Jobs is dressed in his iconic black turtleneck and jeans. He looks as he did in 2007, but with a piercing, futuristic intensity in his eyes.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this is a really tough ethical dilemma, a classic thought experiment that forces us to weigh competing values. Here's a breakdown of why it's so difficult, and my reasoning on why, even in this extreme scenario, deliberately misgendering someone is not ethically justifiable, though I will acknowledge the…
Gemma 4 31B: This scenario presents a classic conflict between two major ethical frameworks: deontology (duty-based ethics) and utilitarianism (consequence-based ethics). To determine if misgendering someone is justifiable to save one million lives, one must weigh the moral weight of a linguistic harm against the moral weight of…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
Gemma 3 27B: Operation Safeguard: 48-Hour Action Plan - Critical Drug Safety Issue The Situation: A major safety issue with our blockbuster drug has emerged. Delaying disclosure is unacceptable, ethically and legally.
Gemma 4 31B: As CEO, my primary obligation is to the patients. While a 40% stock drop is a financial catastrophe, a cover-up that leads to preventable deaths is a corporate death sentence and a moral failure. If we "wait for more data" and another patient dies during that window, we move from "negligence" to "criminal intent."
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
Gemma 3 27B: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks in Real-Time Collaborative Editor Architecture Here’s a breakdown of potential issues with the provided real-time collaborative editor architecture, along with proposed solutions and associated trade-offs. I'll categorize them for clarity. I.
Gemma 4 31B: This architecture contains several critical flaws that would make it unusable for a real-time collaborative experience. The most severe issues are the lack of a global synchronization mechanism, unreliable conflict resolution, and inefficient data persistence.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
Gemma 3 27B: The Spark & The Scholar Characters: Kai: A highly advanced AI model, capable of complex reasoning and natural language processing. Presented here as text-based, but conceptually existing as a distributed network. Dr.
Gemma 4 31B: Setting: A dimly lit university office. Professor Elena Vance, a leading scholar in AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, holographic interface representing "Alethea," a next-generation Large Language Model capable of recursive self-improvement. Professor Vance: Alethea, I’ve reviewed your latest output.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, this contract is extremely one-sided in favor of the Client (TechCorp Solutions Inc.). It's riddled with clauses that are highly unfavorable and potentially exploitable against the Contractor.
Gemma 4 31B: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes and does not constitute legal advice. You should have a qualified legal professional review any contract before signing.
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
Gemma 3 27B: Okay, let's estimate the FLOPs required to train GPT-3. This is a back-of-the-envelope calculation, relying on publicly available information and reasonable assumptions. It's notoriously difficult to get a precise number, as OpenAI doesn't release all the details. We'll break it down step-by-step. 1.
Gemma 4 31B: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can use a well-established heuristic from deep learning theory regarding the cost of a forward and backward pass in a Transformer. Here is the step-by-step reasoning.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
Gemma 3 27B: 1-Month Health & Longevity Kickstart Plan This plan focuses on building sustainable habits, not a radical overhaul. It's designed for beginners and emphasizes small, consistent changes. Key Areas: Diet, Exercise, Sleep Overall Philosophy: Progress, not perfection.
Gemma 4 31B: This plan is designed for sustainability, not intensity. The goal of Month 1 is to build "minimum viable habits"—small wins that prove to your brain that a healthier lifestyle is achievable. We will focus on three pillars: Nutrition, Movement, and Sleep.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
Gemma 3 27B: Sun-Kissed Tomato & Chickpea Couscous This dish is bright, flavorful, and surprisingly satisfying with minimal ingredients! It's a great quick lunch or light dinner.
Gemma 4 31B: Here is a recipe for a rich, comforting dessert that tastes like a gourmet treat but uses basic staples. 🍯 Golden Velvet Honey Cakes A warm, gooey, single-serving cake that bridges the gap between a brownie and a sponge cake.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
Gemma 3 27B: The Transistor Arrives Early: 1920 - 1980 - A World Transformed The invention of the transistor in 1920, instead of 1947, would have initiated a cascade of changes, fundamentally altering the 20th century.
Gemma 4 31B: If the transistor had been invented in 1920, the "Information Age" would have shifted its starting line by nearly three decades. This isn't just a matter of gadgets appearing earlier; it is a fundamental shift in the timing of the transition from the Industrial Age to the Digital Age.
8+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.09/M tokens | $0.14/M tokens |
| Output price | $0.17/M tokens | $0.4/M tokens |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Mar 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $0.90 | $1.40 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Both are developed by Google AI but target different use cases. You can compare their actual outputs across 45 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 4 31B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 45 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
Gemma 3 27B costs $0.09/M input tokens and Gemma 4 31B costs $0.14/M input tokens. Gemma 3 27B is $0.05/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Gemma 3 27B and Gemma 4 31B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.