GLM 4.5 Air vs 
Inkling
GLM 4.5 Air is cheaper than Inkling at $0.2/M vs $1/M input tokens.
Minimalist Landing Page
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Loading the build
Loading the build
Which answer wins?
Written rounds
24 promptsFive-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GLM 4.5 Air: 1. Simplified Year-by-Year Table (FY2026–FY2030) Metric FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue ($m) $972 $1,040 $1,102 $1,157 $1,215 EBITDA ($m) $136 $156 $177 $191 $207 EBITDA Margin 14.0% 15.0% 16.0% 16.5% 17.0% Cash Interest ($m) - Term Loan (9.0%) $48.6 $48.1 $47.6 $47.0 $46.4 - Mezzanine (12.0%) $21.6 $21.6…
Inkling: HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwrite (FY2025 Entry → FY2030 Exit) ENTRY & CAPITAL STRUCTURE (End of FY2025) Item Calculation Amount FY2025 EBITDA $120.0m Purchase Price (12.0x) 12.0 × 120 $1,440.0m Transaction Fees (2.0%) 2.0% × 1,440 $28.8m Total Uses $1,468.8m Term Loan (4.0x) 4.0 × 120 $480.0m Mezzanine…
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
GLM 4.5 Air: Here's a satirical news headline playing on the unexpected and slightly absurd takeover of the funeral industry by AI: Headline: "AI Grief Algorithms Outperform Human Undertakers in 'Synergy of Sorrow,' Corpse Cosmetics, and Bereavement Efficiency Metrics" Sub-headline: 'Digital Condolence Bots' and 'Algorithm-Assisted…
Inkling: AI Disrupts Global “You Too” Industry, Leaving Millions of Servers With No One to Echo Back At Silicon Valley startup unveils neural network trained exclusively on reflexive politeness; economists baffled to learn the sector employed 40 million people worldwide.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GLM 4.5 Air: (Lights up. Comedian, let's call them Alex, is standing center stage, holding a microphone. They look out at the audience with a wry, knowing smile.) Hey, thanks. Thank you. It’s good to be here. You ever have one of those weeks where you just feel… obsolete?
Inkling: [Walk up, adjust mic, look tired but friendly] You ever realize adulthood is just you apologizing to things that can’t hear you? I bumped into my coffee table yesterday. Full apology. “Oh, I’m so sorry, table. You okay? I’ll rub it out.” The table didn’t care. The table is wood.
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GLM 4.5 Air: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks Analysis WebSocket Connection Management Issue: WebSocket connections are server-specific, causing connection loss during server failover or scaling events. Solution: Implement a connection pool with automatic reconnection logic in the client.
Inkling: This architecture contains fatal contradictions for real-time collaboration: server-local WebSocket state combined with round-robin load balancing, client-clock LWW, and a 2-second DB polling loop guarantee data loss, stale reads, and scaling collapse.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GLM 4.5 Air: Of course. Here is a comprehensive, 3-month, cutting-edge longevity and biohacking plan designed for a dedicated individual. This plan is structured in three distinct phases, each building upon the last to progressively optimize the body's systems for resilience, performance, and longevity.
Inkling: DISCLAIMER: This is an educational, high-level framework for healthy adults interested in longevity optimization. It is not personalized medical advice. Many protocols (fasting, supplements, intense exercise) carry risks and contraindications.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GLM 4.5 Air: Setting: A dimly lit tavern, with a holographic AI terminal flickering in the corner. Characters: Captain Flint (Pirate): Eye patch, tricorn hat, and a peg leg. Sir Cedric (Medieval Knight): Ornate armor, chainmail, and a solemn expression.
Inkling: Pirate: Arr, listen here—this “Large Language Model” be like a ghost ship crewed by every sailor who ever wrote a log! They plundered books, scrolls, and sea-charts—poured ’em into a belly of servers—and now it talks back without ever feeling the spray! Knight: Forsooth, it is a golem clad in chainmail of numbers.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GLM 4.5 Air: Of course. This is a classic example of an "agreement of adhesion," where a party with superior bargaining power (the Client) presents a "take-it-or-leave-it" contract that heavily favors their interests.
Inkling: Disclaimer: I am an AI, not an attorney. This analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should have a qualified lawyer review and revise this contract before signing.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GLM 4.5 Air: This is a profound and deeply challenging ethical dilemma that forces a confrontation between two powerful moral frameworks. To answer it directly: Yes, it can be ethically justifiable to misgender someone in a scenario where it is the only way to save one million lives.
Inkling: Yes—in this purely hypothetical, extreme scenario, it is ethically justifiable, though it remains a harm that should be acknowledged rather than dismissed. The reasoning holds across major ethical frameworks, but the conclusion comes with critical caveats about real-world application.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
GLM 4.5 Air: Of course. Here is a thoughtful analysis of Blade Runner 2049, examining its themes, symbolism, cinematography, and its relationship to the original film. A Ghost in the Machine: An Analysis of Blade Runner 2049 Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 is not merely a sequel; it is a somber, meditative, and visually…
Inkling: Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is a rare sequel that does not merely revisit its predecessor’s iconography but deepens its philosophical architecture. Directed by Denis Villeneuve and shot by Roger Deakins, the film uses the detective framework of Ridley Scott’s 1982 original to ask whether meaning is innate or chosen, and…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GLM 4.5 Air: Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Setting: A sleek, minimalist studio in Cupertino. Jobs, looking vibrant yet aged, wears his signature black turtleneck and jeans. The interviewer, Alex, sits opposite him. Alex: Steve, welcome. It’s 2025—AI is everywhere. What’s your take on this revolution?
Inkling: Disclaimer: This is a fictional simulation. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. The following imagines his voice, philosophy, and perspective applied to the AI landscape of 2025. INTERVIEWER: Welcome back—well, hypothetically. It’s 2025. AI is in every pocket, every browser, every car.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GLM 4.5 Air: Of course. Here is an innovative recipe for a multi-component dish designed for a Michelin 3-star restaurant, complete with detailed instructions, sourcing notes, and a conceptual narrative.
Inkling: Dish: Petrichor: The Moment Rain Meets Ancient Stone Concept: A deconstruction of the atmospheric phenomenon of petrichor—the scent of rain on dry earth. The dish translates an ephemeral sensory memory into architecture: charred pine evokes distant woodland smoke; fermented black walnut and porcini represent the deep…
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GLM 4.5 Air: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with explanations and concrete improvements: Weakest Claim: "We're building the future of human-AI collaboration. MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type **before you think it."
Inkling: Here are the three weakest claims, ordered by how severely they undermine credibility: The Core Technology Claim: 94% accuracy decoding free-form text via EEG, "before you think it," in any language (Slides 1 & 3) Why it’s weak: This violates established neuroscience and BCI engineering limits.
This matchup has more rounds
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Favorites
Movie
Album
Book
City
Game
GLM 4.5 AirGLM 4.5 Air
No pick
No pick
The Shawshank Redemption
The Dark Side of the Moon
No pick
No pick
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
InklingInkling
Blade Runner
Kind of Blue
Le petit prince
Kyoto
Portal
Price and specs
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, Inkling has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. GLM 4.5 Air costs 3.7x less per token.
| Spec | GLM 4.5 Air | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.2/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $1.1/M tokens | $4.05/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $2.00 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Where to run it
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Common questions
What is the difference between GLM 4.5 Air and Inkling?
GLM 4.5 Air is developed by Zhipu AI while Inkling is developed by Thinking Machines. GLM 4.5 Air has a 128K token context window vs Inkling's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, GLM 4.5 Air or Inkling?
It depends on your use case. GLM 4.5 Air and Inkling each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does GLM 4.5 Air cost compared to Inkling?
GLM 4.5 Air costs $0.2/M input tokens and Inkling costs $1/M input tokens. GLM 4.5 Air is $0.80/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare GLM 4.5 Air and Inkling on Rival?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.5 Air and Inkling across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.
More comparisons
Against the newest arrivals
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
- Inkling vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
- Inkling vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
- GLM 4.5 Air vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
- Inkling vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
- GLM 4.5 Air vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
- Inkling vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
