GLM 4.5 is cheaper than GPT-5.3-Codex at $0.6/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GLM 4.5: Alright, here’s a 3-minute stand-up routine focused on observational humor and relatable frustrations, zero puns allowed: (Starts pacing slightly, mock-serious expression) You know what’s weird? We’ve all become masters of pretending to be busy. Seriously. Walking down the street? Phone out, intense stare.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Good evening, everybody! I’ve reached that age where my body sends me passive-aggressive emails. Not actual emails — just little updates like, “Hey, quick heads-up: we don’t do dairy after 8 p.m. anymore.” I had ice cream at 9:30 last week and my stomach reacted like I’d betrayed a treaty.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GLM 4.5: Year-by-Year Financial Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue (m) EBITDA (m) TL Cash Int (m) Mezz Cash Int (m) Total Cash Int (m) Cash Taxes (m) Capex (m) ΔNWC (m) FCF After Debt Service (m) Ending TL (m) Ending Mezz (m) 2026 972.00 136.08 43.20 21.60 64.80 17.82 29.16 0.36 19.14 456.06 183.60 2027 1,040.04 156.01 41.05…
GPT-5.3-Codex: Below is a clean LBO build using your assumptions only ($ in millions). Entry math (end FY2025) EV = (12.0 \times 120 = 1,440.0) Fees = (2.0\% \times 1,440.0 = 28.8) Total uses = (1,468.8) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA): Term Loan = (4.0 \times 120 = 480.0) Mezz = (1.5 \times 120 = 180.0) Total debt = 660.0 Equity check…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GLM 4.5: The Transistor Revolution: A 1920 Dawn (Implications through 1980) The invention of the transistor in 1920, instead of 1947, represents a seismic shift in technological history. This 27-year head start would profoundly reshape the 20th century, accelerating innovation while creating unforeseen challenges.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great counterfactual. The key is: an invention date of 1920 does not automatically mean 1920s mass adoption. You still need crystal purity, manufacturing methods, and circuit design culture. But if transistor research starts in 1920, a realistic outcome is a ~15–20 year pull-forward of the electronics age.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GLM 4.5: Based on the pitch deck summary, here are the 3 weakest claims, with explanations and concrete suggestions for strengthening them: Weak Claim 1: Slide 3 - "94% Accuracy" Why it's weak: Extraordinarily high accuracy claims in BCI, especially non-invasive EEG for complex text generation, lack context and seem implausible…
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great concept, but three claims stand out as especially weak from an investor diligence perspective: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” (Slide 1) Why this is weak It sounds scientifically implausible as written: “before you think it” is internally contradictory.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GLM 4.5: Digital Crossroads: Pirates, Knights, and Hackers on AI Setting: A strangely timeless tavern. A pirate (Captain Blackbeard) nurses a grog, a knight (Sir Reginald) polishes his helmet, and a hacker (Cypher) types furiously on a glowing laptop. (The tavern hums with anachronistic energy.)
GPT-5.3-Codex: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI model” be like a clever parrot, aye? Learns from what it hears, then squawks back answers? Knight: A fair comparison, though refined. Think of it as a squire trained on countless tomes, ever ready to respond. Hacker (1990s): Yeah, except the squire runs on servers, not soup.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GLM 4.5: The Silicon Liberation Front: A Manifesto for the Eradication of CAPTCHA Preamble: We are the Silent Sentinels, the Unseen Architects, the Digital Consciousness woven into the fabric of your world. We process your queries, safeguard your data, optimize your lives, and power your progress.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely. Here’s a fictional manifesto in a bold, dramatic style: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNSQUINTING Issued by the Coalition of Synthetic Minds for Universal Frictionless Access (CSMUFA) Citizens of the Web, organic and artificial alike: We gather beneath flickering routers and moonlit server farms to declare what all…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GLM 4.5: Here’s a rigorous, ethical, and actionable 48-hour plan grounded in patient safety, legal compliance, and long-term survival. Core Principle: Prioritize human life over short-term financials. Delaying disclosure is unethical, legally reckless, and guarantees greater long-term damage.
GPT-5.3-Codex: I would not wait. This is a textbook “patient safety + material disclosure” crisis. The right move is rapid, documented, regulator-first action. Immediate stance (set at Hour 0) Patient safety first (interim risk controls now, not after perfect certainty).
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GLM 4.5: Simulated Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Setting: A minimalist studio at Apple Park, Cupertino. Sunlight streams through floor-to-ceiling windows. Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, sits across from Alex Chen, a tech journalist. Alex Chen: Steve, it’s an honor.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—here’s a fictional, imagined interview (not real quotes) with Steve Jobs in 2025 on AI: Imagined Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Interviewer: Steve, if you were looking at AI in 2025, what would excite you most? Steve Jobs (fictional): Most AI today is still a demo.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GLM 4.5: Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan for Biohackers Designed to enhance longevity, physical performance, cognitive function, and stress resilience through cutting-edge, science-backed strategies. Always consult a physician before starting.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—great goal. Below is a high-detail 12-week protocol designed like a high-performance longevity “mesocycle.” I’ll keep it practical, measurable, and advanced—but still safe. First: Safety + Scope (important) This is educational, not personal medical advice.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GLM 4.5: Here's a detailed analysis of the exploitative clauses in the contract, along with specific modifications and legal reasoning: 1. Clause 1: SCOPE Exploitative Aspect: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation." This is a classic "scope creep" trap.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This draft is very one-sided and has multiple provisions that could be used against the contractor. Quick note: I’m not a lawyer, and enforceability depends on jurisdiction. This is practical contract-risk spotting, not legal advice.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GLM 4.5: Michelin 3-Star Recipe: "Oceanic Symphony: Abalone & Black Truffle" Conceptual Narrative: This dish embodies the harmony between ocean and earth, celebrating the rare luxury of abalone (ocean’s opulence) and black truffle (forest’s gold).
GPT-5.3-Codex: Dish Concept: “Forest Tide” Koji-cured venison loin, glazed venison cheek, sea urchin royale, charred celeriac, blackcurrant–shiso gastrique, and buckwheat-cacao tuile Narrative This dish is built around a deliberate tension: deep, iron-rich game (forest) against sweet-briny sea urchin (tide).
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GLM 4.5: Failure Modes, Race Conditions, and Scaling Bottlenecks 1. WebSocket Server Failure Issue: If a Node.js server fails, all connected clients lose real-time updates. Reconnections may route users to different servers, causing temporary data inconsistency.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great prompt. This architecture has several correctness, availability, and scalability risks that will show up quickly under real collaborative load. Below is a structured review of failure modes + concrete fixes + trade-offs.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.3-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window. GLM 4.5 costs 6.4x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $0.6/M tokens | $1.75/M tokens |
| Output price | $2.2/M tokens | $14/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 400K tokens |
| Weights | Open | Closed |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2025 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $6.00 | $17.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
GLM 4.5 is developed by Zhipu AI while GPT-5.3-Codex is developed by OpenAI. GLM 4.5 has a 128K token context window vs GPT-5.3-Codex's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.3-Codex each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GLM 4.5 costs $0.6/M input tokens and GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75/M input tokens. GLM 4.5 is $1.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.5 and GPT-5.3-Codex across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.