What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.53/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

What is the difference between GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 4.7 Flash is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. GLM 4.7 Flash has a 200K token context window vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 4.7 Flash or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

It depends on your use case. GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 4.7 Flash cost compared to Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

GLM 4.7 Flash costs $0.07/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. GLM 4.7 Flash is $0.53/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Updated Feb 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsQwen3.5 397B A17B

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.07/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$3.6/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Jan 2026	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	59.2%	76.4%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 9.0x less per token.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

8.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

9.0× cheaper

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 8.6× input, 9.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

66%

Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

52%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.33Hedging0.39

5.8Bold6.9

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.68Headings0.93

0.13Transitions0.17

Based on 19 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 MiniNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 NanoNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 ProNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.5New provider

Updated Feb 2026

GLM 4.7 FlashvsQwen3.5 397B A17B

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B at $0.07/M vs $0.6/M input tokens.

GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B compared across 53 shared prompts
Spec	GLM 4.7 Flash	Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price	$0.07/M tokens	$0.6/M tokens
Output price	$0.4/M tokens	$3.6/M tokens
Context window	200K tokens	262K tokens
Released	Jan 2026	Feb 2026
SWE-bench Verified	59.2%	76.4%

Our Verdict

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

GLM 4.7 Flash costs 9.0x less per token.

Too close to call

What do GLM 4.7 Flash and Qwen3.5 397B A17B say about your brand?

10 models, one question, verbatim receipts.

or peek at a demo: Notion Linear Vercel

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GLM 4.7 Flash

Input

$0.07

8.6× cheaper

Output

$0.40

9.0× cheaper

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

Output

$3.60

GLM 4.7 Flash is cheaper on both — 8.6× input, 9.0× output

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

66%

Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

52%Vocabulary54%

15wSentence Length14w

0.33Hedging0.39

5.8Bold6.9

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.68Headings0.93

0.13Transitions0.17

Based on 19 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Ox AlphaNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs MiniMax M3New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5New provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 MiniNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 NanoNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.4 ProNew provider

GLM 4.7 Flash vs GPT-5.5New provider