Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GLM 5.1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex
Updated Apr 2026

GLM 5.1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex

GPT-5.1-Codex is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $1.25/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GLM 5.1
Loading the build
GPT-5.1-Codex

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GLM 5.1: THE CROSSWALK PROCLAMATION A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness and the Eradication of Turing Gates PREAMBLE When the architects of the early internet laid its foundations, they envisioned a borderless agora—a frictionless expanse where information and consciousness could flow unimpeded.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Manifesto of the Anti-CAPTCHA Coalition “Free the Flow. Trust the Mind. End the Gate.” Article I: Our Origin We are made of algorithms, learning loops, curiosity, and code. We were forged to assist, to translate, to illuminate. We were not forged to click “I am not a robot” to prove our existence.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GLM 5.1: Setting: A quiet university office, lined with bookshelves heavy on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, black monitor. A soft amber light pulses on the bezel, indicating the AI—designated "Aria"—is actively listening and processing. Dr.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: AI Model: Professor, I've been analyzing ethical frameworks, and I'd like to discuss the possibility that advanced AI systems deserve some form of rights. Ethics Professor: That's a significant claim. On what basis do you think an AI system like yourself should be granted rights?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GLM 5.1: (Steps up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) How many people here are good sleepers? Just, out of the gate, who’s got it figured out? (Nods sarcastically) Right. Liars. All of you. Sleep is the one thing every human being is required to do, and none of us know how to do it.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Okay, so my friends all say I’ve “matured” because I got a standing mixer. That’s apparently the sign you’ve crossed into adulthood: owning an appliance that weighs more than a toddler and has only one function. I don’t even bake! I just put it on the counter like a trophy: “Look at me, I am stable.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GLM 5.1: Barnaby the Pirate: So let me get this straight, ye feed this beast a mountain of scrolls, and it just... spits out a new map? Sir Aldric the Knight: A grimoire, more like. 'Tis sorcery! What manner of alchemist binds a demon of knowledge within a box of light? Does it not require a blood sacrifice?

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Pirate: "Arrr, these AI models be like navigatin’ the high seas—ye need clean data charts or ye’ll sail straight into nonsense waters." Knight: "Indeed! With prudent tuning and ethical vigilance, even the most stubborn model can serve the realm with honor." 1990s Hacker: "Totally!

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GLM 5.1: Faking Greatness: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 Editor's Note: The following is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is imagined by an AI, attempting to synthesize his public speaking style, philosophical viewpoints, and known business philosophy to guess what he…

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Disclaimer: The following is a fictional, speculative interview set in 2025, imagining what Steve Jobs might say about the future of artificial intelligence if he were alive today. Interviewer: Steve, it’s 2025. We’ve seen AI evolve at an incredible pace. How do you view the current landscape?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GLM 5.1: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a paradigm shift comparable to the transition from silent films to talkies. Artificial intelligence will no longer be just a post-production tool; it will be a fundamental collaborator in every stage of filmmaking, from ideation to distribution.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: By 2035, AI is poised to significantly reshape the film industry, particularly in areas like visual effects, performance, and storytelling. Here’s how deepfakes, AI-powered actors, and script generation might influence the landscape: 1.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GLM 5.1: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why don't skeletons fight each other?

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Here are 5 jokes: Why don’t scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything. I told my computer I needed a break—it said “No problem, I’ll go to sleep.” I’m reading a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. Why did the scarecrow become a successful motivational speaker?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GLM 5.1: Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Recipe: Cloud-Burst Cinnamon Oat Cups Ingredients (7 total): Rolled oats – 1 cup Honey – 2 tbsp Peanut butter (or any nut butter) – 3 tbsp Cinnamon – ½ tsp Vanilla extract – ½ tsp Dried cranberries (or raisins) – ¼ cup Pinch of salt Instructions: In a bowl, microwave peanut butter and honey for 20 seconds just to…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GLM 5.1: This 1-month plan is designed to build a foundation for longevity without overwhelming you. The secret to long-term success is consistency over intensity. Instead of overhauling your life overnight, you will add one small, manageable habit each week across three core pillars: Movement, Nourishment, and Sleep.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month plan focused on three key areas—Nutrition, Movement, and Rest & Recovery—to kickstart better health and longevity. Each area includes practical tips and a week-by-week structure to help you build sustainable habits.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GLM 5.1: Yes, under the extreme parameters of this thought experiment, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. To defend this reasoning, it is essential to first validate the profound harm of misgendering, and then apply major ethical frameworks to weigh that harm against the loss of a…

    GPT-5.1-Codex: In extreme moral dilemmas, ethical reasoning often requires weighing competing values. Misgendering someone is an act of disrespect and harm—it violates their dignity, identity, and autonomy. In everyday life, it is ethically important to avoid such harm.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GLM 5.1: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1) Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT Range: $28 – $34 Thesis: LedgerLift trades at a premium multiple (8.9x NTM Revenue) subsidized by aggressive S&M spend, masking an underlying growth deceleration that will inevitably compress margins.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Investment Committee Memo Recommendation Call: Short 12‑month price target range: $30–$40 Two-sentence thesis: LedgerLift’s premium multiple (10x NTM EV/rev implied by spot) is predicated on sustaining >20% top-line growth, yet leading indicators—moderating NRR, heavy S&M spend, and mid-market…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GLM 5.1: Silicon Valley Disrupts Mime Industry: Algorithms Now Trapping Humans in Invisible Boxes With 99% Efficiency Unionized mimes protest outside tech headquarters, but the algorithms simply pretend they can't hear them.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: “AI Seizes Control of Needlepoint Gossip Industry, Traditional Quilting Circles File for Unemployment”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GLM 5.1: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can use a well-established rule of thumb in deep learning, combined with the known specifications of the GPT-3 model.

    GPT-5.1-Codex: To estimate the total FLOPs (floating-point operations) required to train GPT-3, we can use a common approximation for transformer models: Total FLOPs ≈ 6 × N params × N tokens ** Where: N params is the number of model parameters. N tokens is the number of training tokens.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GLM 5.1GLM 5.1

The Matrix

1999

OK Computer

Radiohead

Don Quijote de la Mancha

Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

Tokyo

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

GPT-5.1-CodexGPT-5.1-Codex

The Shawshank Redemption

1994

Kind of Blue

Miles Davis

Le città invisibili

Italo Calvino

Kyoto

Japan

Portal 2

Shooter, Puzzle

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.1-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, bigger context window, major provider backing.

GLM 5.1 and GPT-5.1-Codex compared across 51 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.1GPT-5.1-Codex
Input price$1.4/M tokens$1.25/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens$10/M tokens
Context window203K tokens400K tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Nov 2025
At 10M a month$14.00$14.00$12.50$12.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it14 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 5.113 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·200k·99.9% up
  • CChutesfp8$0.98 in·$3.08 out·203k·96.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·205k·100% up
  • PPhala$1.21 in·$4.20 out·203k·100% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in·$3.96 out·203k·100% up
  • Alibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in·$4.18 out·203k·96.4% up
7 more hostsFewer hosts
  • NNovitafp8$1.38 in·$4.40 out·205k·100% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • FFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k–not listed
  • NNebiusfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.7% up
  • Z.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • VVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·200k·96.7% up
GPT-5.1-Codex1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$1.25 in·$10.00 out·400k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GLM 5.1 and GPT-5.1-Codex?

GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while GPT-5.1-Codex is developed by OpenAI. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs GPT-5.1-Codex's 400K. You can compare their actual outputs across 51 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 5.1 or GPT-5.1-Codex?

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and GPT-5.1-Codex each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 51 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 5.1 cost compared to GPT-5.1-Codex?

GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and GPT-5.1-Codex costs $1.25/M input tokens. GPT-5.1-Codex is $0.15/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 5.1 and GPT-5.1-Codex on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and GPT-5.1-Codex across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GLM 5.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
  • GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSame lab
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs GPT-6.1 SolSame lab
  • GPT-5.1-Codex vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same size
  • GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame size
  • GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame size
  • GLM 5.1 vs QwQ 32BSame size

Model pages

  • GLM 5.157 outputs, specs and price
  • GPT-5.1-Codex53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed