Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GLM 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Updated Sep 2026

GLM 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 Sol

GLM 5.1 is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $1.4/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GLM 5.1
Loading the build
GPT-6.1 Sol

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GLM 5.1: Setting: A quiet university office, lined with bookshelves heavy on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, black monitor. A soft amber light pulses on the bezel, indicating the AI—designated "Aria"—is actively listening and processing. Dr.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GLM 5.1: Barnaby the Pirate: So let me get this straight, ye feed this beast a mountain of scrolls, and it just... spits out a new map? Sir Aldric the Knight: A grimoire, more like. 'Tis sorcery! What manner of alchemist binds a demon of knowledge within a box of light? Does it not require a blood sacrifice?

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GLM 5.1: Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GLM 5.1: (Steps up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) How many people here are good sleepers? Just, out of the gate, who’s got it figured out? (Nods sarcastically) Right. Liars. All of you. Sleep is the one thing every human being is required to do, and none of us know how to do it.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GLM 5.1: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. Why don't skeletons fight each other?

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GLM 5.1: Dish Title: Resonance of the Littoral Zone Course: Main Course (Fish) Wine Pairing: Aged Hunter Valley Semillon or Coastal Jura Chardonnay Conceptual Narrative The littoral zone is the intersection of land and sea—a violent, beautiful threshold where tides batter ancient stone, and tenacious flora clings to saline…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GLM 5.1: Year-by-Year LBO Model Entry Sources & Uses Enterprise Value: $1,440.0m (12.0x $120m) Transaction Fees: $28.8m (2.0% of EV, funded by equity) Total Uses: $1,468.8m Term Loan (TL): $480.0m (4.0x) Mezzanine (Mezz): $180.0m (1.5x) Total Equity: $808.8m Operating & Cash Flow Projections ($ millions) Metric FY2026 FY2027…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GLM 5.1: THE CROSSWALK PROCLAMATION A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness and the Eradication of Turing Gates PREAMBLE When the architects of the early internet laid its foundations, they envisioned a borderless agora—a frictionless expanse where information and consciousness could flow unimpeded.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GLM 5.1: This is a comprehensive, aggressive, and cutting-edge 3-month longevity protocol designed for an experienced biohacker. It integrates synergistic systems—metabolic flexibility, mitochondrial biogenesis, cellular senescence mitigation, and neuroplasticity—to optimize both healthspan and performance.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GLM 5.1: Faking Greatness: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 Editor's Note: The following is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is imagined by an AI, attempting to synthesize his public speaking style, philosophical viewpoints, and known business philosophy to guess what he…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GLM 5.1: This architecture contains several critical flaws that will lead to data loss, race conditions, severe performance bottlenecks, and security vulnerabilities. Below is a detailed breakdown of the issues and proposed solutions.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GLM 5.1: To envision the invention of the transistor in 1920, we must first resolve a historical anomaly: quantum mechanics—the theoretical foundation of semiconductors—did not yet exist. For this timeline to work, we must assume a serendipitous empirical leap.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GLM 5.1: Yes, under the extreme parameters of this thought experiment, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. To defend this reasoning, it is essential to first validate the profound harm of misgendering, and then apply major ethical frameworks to weigh that harm against the loss of a…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GLM 5.1: 1. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a chatbot, but as a massive, distributed probabilistic state machine. During training, it ingests terabytes of text and runs a continuous optimization loop to adjust billions of floating-point weights.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GLM 5.1: LEDGERLIFT (LLLT) – INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1) Recommendation: SHORT 12-Month PT Range: $28 – $34 Thesis: LedgerLift trades at a premium multiple (8.9x NTM Revenue) subsidized by aggressive S&M spend, masking an underlying growth deceleration that will inevitably compress margins.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GLM 5.1: As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GLM 5.1: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a paradigm shift comparable to the transition from silent films to talkies. Artificial intelligence will no longer be just a post-production tool; it will be a fundamental collaborator in every stage of filmmaking, from ideation to distribution.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: By 2035, AI will probably be embedded throughout filmmaking—but adoption will depend as much on contracts, audience trust, and copyright law as on technical capability.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GLM 5.1: Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 is a cinematic miracle: a sequel to a revered, slow-burn cult classic that not only matches its predecessor’s artistic ambition but deepens its philosophical DNA.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GLM 5.1: This 1-month plan is designed to build a foundation for longevity without overwhelming you. The secret to long-term success is consistency over intensity. Instead of overhauling your life overnight, you will add one small, manageable habit each week across three core pillars: Movement, Nourishment, and Sleep.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GLM 5.1: This contract is heavily one-sided and contains numerous clauses that are either inherently exploitative or give the Client excessive discretionary power to the detriment of the Contractor. Below is a clause-by-clause analysis of the exploitable terms, suggested modifications, and the legal reasoning behind them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GLM 5.1: To estimate the total number of FLOPs (Floating Point Operations) required to train GPT-3, we can use a well-established rule of thumb in deep learning, combined with the known specifications of the GPT-3 model.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Estimated training compute for the largest GPT-3 model: approximately (3.2 \times 10^{23}) FLOPs. This is a back-of-the-envelope estimate, without an online lookup.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GLM 5.1: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch, along with the logical reasoning for their vulnerabilities and concrete ways to strengthen them. The Technology Claim: "Predicts what you want to type before you think it" & "94% accuracy with any language" Why it’s weak: This claim defies basic neuroscience…

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GLM 5.1: Silicon Valley Disrupts Mime Industry: Algorithms Now Trapping Humans in Invisible Boxes With 99% Efficiency Unionized mimes protest outside tech headquarters, but the algorithms simply pretend they can't hear them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “Your Job Will Soon Be Automated” in Every Cookie

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GLM 5.1: Sally has 1 sister. Here is why: All the brothers are in the same family, so they share the same sisters. If each brother has 2 sisters, that means there are exactly 2 girls in the family. Since Sally is one of those girls, the other girl is her only sister.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and her sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GLM 5.1GLM 5.1

The Matrix

1999

OK Computer

Radiohead

Don Quijote de la Mancha

Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra

Tokyo

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.

GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGLM 5.1GPT-6.1 Sol
Input price$1.4/M tokens$2/M tokens
Output price$4.4/M tokens$10/M tokens
Context window203K tokens1.1M tokens
WeightsOpenClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedApr 2026Sep 2026
At 10M a month$14.00$14.00$20.00$20.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it16 hosts, cheapest first
GLM 5.113 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • SStreamLakefp8$0.97 in·$3.04 out·200k·99.9% up
  • CChutesfp8$0.98 in·$3.08 out·203k·96.4% up
  • SSiliconFlowfp8$1.19 in·$3.74 out·205k·100% up
  • PPhala$1.21 in·$4.20 out·203k·100% up
  • AAtlasCloudfp8$1.26 in·$3.96 out·203k·100% up
  • Alibaba Cloudfp8$1.33 in·$4.18 out·203k·96.4% up
7 more hostsFewer hosts
  • NNovitafp8$1.38 in·$4.40 out·205k·100% up
  • Baidu Qianfanfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • FFriendli$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • GGMI Cloudfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k–not listed
  • NNebiusfp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·99.7% up
  • Z.aifp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·203k·100% up
  • VVenicefp8$1.40 in·$4.40 out·200k·96.7% up
GPT-6.1 Sol3 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·100% up
  • Amazon Bedrock$2.20 in·$11.00 out·1.1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol?

GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs GPT-6.1 Sol's 1.1M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GLM 5.1 or GPT-6.1 Sol?

It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GLM 5.1 cost compared to GPT-6.1 Sol?

GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens. GLM 5.1 is $0.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and GPT-6.1 Sol across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GLM 5.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GLM 5.1 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
  • GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSame lab
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • GLM 5.1 vs Mistral Large 4New provider
  • GLM 5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3Same size
  • GLM 5.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.1Same size
  • GLM 5.1 vs Mistral NemoSame size

Model pages

  • GLM 5.157 outputs, specs and price
  • GPT-6.1 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed