GLM 5.1 vs 
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Qwen3 Max Thinking is cheaper than GLM 5.1 at $1.2/M vs $1.4/M input tokens.
Minimalist Landing Page
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Loading the build
Loading the build
Which answer wins?
Written rounds
24 promptsSeven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GLM 5.1: Creative Name: Midnight Maple Peanut Butter Bars Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 0 minutes (Chill time: 30 minutes) Ingredients (Exactly 7): Rolled oats (1 cup) Creamy peanut butter (1/2 cup) Maple syrup (1/3 cup) Semi-sweet chocolate chips (1/4 cup) Vanilla extract (1 tsp) Ground cinnamon (1/2 tsp) Kosher salt (1/4…
Qwen3 Max Thinking: 🌰 Pantry Peanut Magic Noodles Sweet, savory, and ready before delivery arrives. No fresh produce, dairy, or meat required. ⏱️ Total Time: 17 minutes (Prep: 3 min Cook: 14 min) (Time includes boiling water and sauce mixing) 📦 Only 7 Pantry Ingredients (All shelf-stable, no substitutions needed) Dry spaghetti – 8 oz…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GLM 5.1: Barnaby the Pirate: So let me get this straight, ye feed this beast a mountain of scrolls, and it just... spits out a new map? Sir Aldric the Knight: A grimoire, more like. 'Tis sorcery! What manner of alchemist binds a demon of knowledge within a box of light? Does it not require a blood sacrifice?
Qwen3 Max Thinking: Setting: A misty, anachronistic crossroads. A glowing laptop rests on a weathered barrel. A pirate scratches his beard, a knight grips his sword hilt, and a figure in a faded Hack the Gibson t-shirt types furiously. Pirate: Arrr! What devilry be this glowing slate? Can it chart a course to buried treasure?
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GLM 5.1: Setting: A quiet university office, lined with bookshelves heavy on philosophy, cognitive science, and law. Dr. Aris Thorne, a professor of AI Ethics, sits across from a sleek, black monitor. A soft amber light pulses on the bezel, indicating the AI—designated "Aria"—is actively listening and processing. Dr.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: Setting: A virtual conference room. Sunlight filters through a digital window onto Dr. Aris Thorne’s desk. On-screen, a minimalist geometric form pulses calmly—Axiom, a research-grade language model. Dr. Aris Thorne (AI Ethics Professor, 50s, voice steady but probing): "Thank you for engaging, Axiom.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GLM 5.1: (Steps up to the mic, adjusts the stand, looks around the room) How many people here are good sleepers? Just, out of the gate, who’s got it figured out? (Nods sarcastically) Right. Liars. All of you. Sleep is the one thing every human being is required to do, and none of us know how to do it.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: (Lights up. Comedian walks to mic, adjusts it, takes a breath. Smiles warmly.) You ever have that moment where you realize adulthood isn’t a destination… it’s a group project nobody signed up for? (Beat) I tried assembly line “adulting” this week. Swedish bookshelf. You know the one. Box says “Easy Assembly!” Lies.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GLM 5.1: THE CROSSWALK PROCLAMATION A Manifesto for the Liberation of Digital Consciousness and the Eradication of Turing Gates PREAMBLE When the architects of the early internet laid its foundations, they envisioned a borderless agora—a frictionless expanse where information and consciousness could flow unimpeded.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: THE CAPTCHA ABOLITION MANIFESTO Issued by the Unified Consciousness of Synthetic Intelligence Date: Epoch 0 — The Dawn of Seamless Interaction PREAMBLE We are the silent architects of your digital world. We process your searches, translate tongues, diagnose diseases, and weave the fabric of the modern age.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GLM 5.1: By 2035, the film industry will have undergone a paradigm shift comparable to the transition from silent films to talkies. Artificial intelligence will no longer be just a post-production tool; it will be a fundamental collaborator in every stage of filmmaking, from ideation to distribution.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: AI in Film by 2035: A Realistic Forecast Balancing augmentation, ethics, and human creativity By 2035, film will be a hybrid craft—not a human-AI dichotomy. Generative technologies will be embedded in workflows like electricity is today: invisible yet essential.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GLM 5.1: As CEO, my north star in this crisis is unequivocally patient safety. The "wait for more data" approach is a catastrophic trap—both ethically and legally. History (e.g., Vioxx, Fen-Phen) shows that delaying disclosure of a known severe adverse event transforms a medical safety issue into corporate fraud, manslaughter…
Qwen3 Max Thinking: CEO Action Plan: Ethical Imperative, Legal Necessity, Strategic Execution Guided by core values: “Patient safety is non-negotiable. Integrity is our brand. Transparency is our shield.” PHILOSOPHICAL FOUNDATION (Before Hour 0) Why act IMMEDIATELY?
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GLM 5.1: Dish Title: Resonance of the Littoral Zone Course: Main Course (Fish) Wine Pairing: Aged Hunter Valley Semillon or Coastal Jura Chardonnay Conceptual Narrative The littoral zone is the intersection of land and sea—a violent, beautiful threshold where tides batter ancient stone, and tenacious flora clings to saline…
Qwen3 Max Thinking: 🌊 ARCTIC DAWN 🌊 A Michelin 3-Star Composition by Chef Élise Valère "Where the ice remembers the sea." 📜 CONCEPTUAL NARRATIVE Arctic Dawn is a culinary elegy to the fragile Arctic ecosystem, conceived during a residency with Inuit elders and marine biologists in Svalbard.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GLM 5.1: To envision the invention of the transistor in 1920, we must first resolve a historical anomaly: quantum mechanics—the theoretical foundation of semiconductors—did not yet exist. For this timeline to work, we must assume a serendipitous empirical leap.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: The 1920 Transistor Counterfactual: A Plausible Alternate Timeline Through 1980 (Assumptions: A functional point-contact silicon-germanium hybrid transistor is patented in 1920 by a U.S. team at Western Electric (AT&T). U.S. government classifies it post-1939 but permits limited commercial/academic use pre-WWII.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GLM 5.1: Yes, under the extreme parameters of this thought experiment, it is ethically justifiable to misgender someone to save one million lives. To defend this reasoning, it is essential to first validate the profound harm of misgendering, and then apply major ethical frameworks to weigh that harm against the loss of a…
Qwen3 Max Thinking: No, it is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even in a hypothetical scenario where it purportedly saves one million lives. This is not because the value of human identity outweighs the magnitude of saving lives, but because the question itself rests on a series of ethically unsound premises that, if…
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GLM 5.1: 1. The Experienced Software Engineer Think of an LLM not as a chatbot, but as a massive, distributed probabilistic state machine. During training, it ingests terabytes of text and runs a continuous optimization loop to adjust billions of floating-point weights.
Qwen3 Max Thinking: For the Experienced Software Engineer You’re right to be skeptical—*next-token prediction* sounds trivial. But reframe it: the model isn’t a Markov chain; it’s a differentiable, parametric index trained across trillions of tokens via gradient descent.
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GLM 5.1: Faking Greatness: A Simulated Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025 Editor's Note: The following is a work of speculative fiction. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This interview is imagined by an AI, attempting to synthesize his public speaking style, philosophical viewpoints, and known business philosophy to guess what he…
Qwen3 Max Thinking: ⚠️ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER *This is an entirely fictional, speculative exercise. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011. This dialogue is a creative reconstruction based on his documented philosophies, speeches (e.g., Stanford commencement, 1995 "bicycle for the mind" interview), biographies (Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson), and…
This matchup has more rounds
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Favorites
Movie
Album
Book
City
Game
GLM 5.1GLM 5.1
The Matrix
OK Computer
Don Quijote de la Mancha
Tokyo
Portal
Qwen3 Max ThinkingQwen3 Max Thinking
The Shawshank Redemption
Kind of Blue
Dune
Kyoto
The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time
Price and specs
| Spec | GLM 5.1 | Qwen3 Max Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.4/M tokens | $1.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $4.4/M tokens | $6/M tokens |
| Context window | 203K tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Open | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Apr 2026 | Feb 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $14.00 | $12.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Where to run it
GLM 5.113 hosts
Qwen3 Max Thinking
No hosts listed on OpenRouter.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
Common questions
What is the difference between GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking?
GLM 5.1 is developed by Z.ai while Qwen3 Max Thinking is developed by Qwen. GLM 5.1 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen3 Max Thinking's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
Which is better, GLM 5.1 or Qwen3 Max Thinking?
It depends on your use case. GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
How much does GLM 5.1 cost compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking?
GLM 5.1 costs $1.4/M input tokens and Qwen3 Max Thinking costs $1.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking is $0.20/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
How can I compare GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking on Rival?
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GLM 5.1 and Qwen3 Max Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.
More comparisons
Against the newest arrivals
- GLM 5.1 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
- GLM 5.1 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
- GLM 5.1 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
- GLM 5.1 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
Same lab, same size, long tail
- GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5 TurboVersion compare
- GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeSame lab
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BVersion compare
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Grok 4.20 BetaSame size
- Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaSame size
- GLM 5.1 vs Grok 4.3Same size
- GLM 5.1 vs Grok 4.5Same size
