What is the difference between Z.ai: GLM 5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Z.ai: GLM 5 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Z.ai: GLM 5 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. in 15 community votes on Rival, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 53 challenges.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Based on 15 community votes on Rival, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Z.ai: GLM 5 is strongest in Conversation, Analysis, Image Generation. However, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads in Web Design.

How much does Z.ai: GLM 5 cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Z.ai: GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.20/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 64% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 15 votes have been collected for this pair across 53 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

What is the difference between Z.ai: GLM 5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Z.ai: GLM 5 is developed by Zhipu AI while Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is developed by Qwen. Z.ai: GLM 5 has a 203K token context window vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B's 262K. in 15 community votes on Rival, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of head-to-head matchups. These results are based on blind head-to-head voting across 53 challenges.

Which is better, Z.ai: GLM 5 or Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Based on 15 community votes on Rival, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of head-to-head matchups against Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B. Z.ai: GLM 5 is strongest in Conversation, Analysis, Image Generation. However, Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B leads in Web Design.

How much does Z.ai: GLM 5 cost compared to Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Z.ai: GLM 5 costs $0.8/M input tokens and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B costs $0.6/M input tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B is $0.20/M cheaper per input. The more expensive model wins 64% of duels, so the premium may be justified by quality.

How are Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B votes collected on Rival?

Rival presents both models' outputs side-by-side in blind duels. Voters see the responses but don't know which model produced each one, eliminating brand bias. 15 votes have been collected for this pair across 53 challenges. All vote data is part of Rival's open dataset.

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Which Is Better?

Updated Feb 2026

Our Verdict

Z.ai: GLM 5Winner

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up

Pick Z.ai: GLM 5. In 15 blind votes, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick Z.ai: GLM 5 for Analysis, Image Generation, Conversation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B for Web Design.

Clear winner

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.ai: GLM 5

Input

$0.80

Output

$2.56

1.4× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

1.3× cheaper

Output

$3.60

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Z.ai: GLM 5 wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

88%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

54%Vocabulary54%

17wSentence Length14w

0.37Hedging0.39

6.3Bold6.9

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.60Headings0.93

0.18Transitions0.17

Based on 22 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.ai: GLM 5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs GPT-5New provider

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider

Updated Feb 2026

Our Verdict

Z.ai: GLM 5Winner

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BRunner-up

Pick Z.ai: GLM 5. In 15 blind votes, Z.ai: GLM 5 wins 64% of the time. That's not luck.

Pick Z.ai: GLM 5 for Analysis, Image Generation, Conversation. Pick Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B for Web Design.

Clear winner

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

Z.ai: GLM 5

Input

$0.80

Output

$2.56

1.4× cheaper

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Input

$0.60

1.3× cheaper

Output

$3.60

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B wins input (1.3× cheaper)·Z.ai: GLM 5 wins output (1.4× cheaper)

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity

88%

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B uses 22.8x more emoji

Z.ai: GLM 5

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

54%Vocabulary54%

17wSentence Length14w

0.37Hedging0.39

6.3Bold6.9

4.7Lists4.2

0.00Emoji0.23

0.60Headings0.93

0.18Transitions0.17

Based on 22 + 23 text responses

Research

What we learned reading every model

Z.ai: GLM 5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B have opinions about your brand too.Ask 10 models what they tell people about you. Verbatim receipts.Run the mirror

FAQ

Common questions

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs MiniMax M3New provider

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs GPT-5New provider

Z.ai: GLM 5 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider