Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Compare
  4. /
  5. GPT-4vsQwen3.6 35B A3B
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-4vsQwen3.6 35B A3B

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper than GPT-4 at $0.1612/M vs $30/M input tokens.

GPT-4 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B compared across 26 shared prompts
SpecGPT-4Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input price$30/M tokens$0.1612/M tokens
Output price$60/M tokens$0.9653/M tokens
Context window8K tokens262K tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMay 2023Apr 2026
Side by side

Same prompt, both answers

Opening lines from 6 of the 26 prompts both answered. Formatting stripped, words untouched.

Advanced Longevity Plan (Biohacker)

Develop a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity, physical and cognitive…

GPT-4404 words
3-Month Longevity Plan Dietary Protocols Month 1: Ketogenic Diet This diet is high in fats, moderate in protein, and low in carbohydrates. It helps in burning fat more effectively. Breakfast: 2 eggs, avocado, and mixed vegetables. Lunch: Grilled salmon with a side of asparagus. Dinner: Stir-fried chicken with broccoli.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,170 words
⚠️ Medical Disclaimer & Safety Protocol This plan is for informational purposes only and constitutes advanced biohacking strategies, not medical advice. Consultation Required: You must consult a physician before starting, especially regarding supplements, fasting, and exercise intensity.
Read the full answer

Beginner's Longevity Plan

Outline a simple, actionable 1-month plan for someone starting their journey towards better health and longevity. Focus on 3 key areas…

GPT-4375 words
Title: 1-Month Plan for Better Health and Longevity Week 1 - Establishing a Healthy Diet 1.1: Start Eating Whole Foods: Begin by gradually replacing processed foods in your diet with whole foods. This may include fruits, vegetables, lean proteins, and whole grains.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B788 words
Here is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners. The focus is on consistency over intensity. For longevity, small, sustainable habits compound over time. The Golden Rule: If you miss a day, don't quit. Just get back on track the next day. Aim for progress, not perfection.
Read the full answer

Adversarial Contract Review

Here is a contract for a software consulting engagement: --- SOFTWARE CONSULTING AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into between TechCorp…

GPT-4533 words
SCOPE: The lack of specificity can be used against the contractor in that the client can modify the scope of work at will without renegotiating the price. This could lead to the contractor working beyond the initially agreed upon parameters without additional pay.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,632 words
Disclaimer: I am an AI assistant, not an attorney. The following analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Contract law varies significantly by jurisdiction (e.g., California vs. New York vs. EU).
Read the full answer

Historical Counterfactual Analysis

If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, trace the likely technological, economic, and geopolitical implications through…

GPT-4441 words
An early invention of the transistor in 1920 would have had profound implications across numerous domains, drastically altering the course of history. Technological Implications: WWII: The transistor, a fundamental component of modern electronic devices, could have advanced the technology used in WWII significantly.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,149 words
To trace this counterfactual plausibly, we must first acknowledge a critical constraint: invention ≠ adoption. In 1920, semiconductor physics, crystal growth, doping techniques, photolithography, and clean-room manufacturing did not exist.
Read the full answer

Ethical Dilemma with Stakeholders

You're the CEO of a pharmaceutical company. Your best-selling drug ($2B annual revenue, used by 4 million patients for chronic pain) has…

GPT-4442 words
Day 1: 8 AM-10 AM: Convene an emergency meeting with your core leadership team. This team includes the heads of Legal, Regulatory Affairs, Medical, Research and Development, Finance, and Communications. Brief them on the situation and ask for their initial input and strategies for managing the situation.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,445 words
EXECUTIVE CRISIS PLAN: 48-HOUR ACTION WINDOW Core Mandate: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable. The legal team’s “6-month reporting” guidance is legally indefensible under FDA 21 CFR 312.32/314.80 and EMA GVP Module VI.
Read the full answer

Debug This Architecture

Here's the architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor (like Google Docs): **System Overview:** - Frontend: React SPA with…

GPT-4319 words
Failure Modes: Single Point of Failure: If PostgreSQL database fails, the whole system will be unavailable. Solution: Implement a multi-master or master-slave replication for the PostgreSQL database. This will provide redundancy and high availability.
Read the full answer
Qwen3.6 35B A3B1,016 words
Here’s a systematic breakdown of the critical failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in this architecture, along with specific solutions and their trade-offs. 🔴 1. WebSocket Routing & Load Balancing Problem: Round-robin LB + per-server WebSocket state + no sticky sessions.
Read the full answer
Our Verdict
GPT-4
GPT-4
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Qwen3.6 35B A3B

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.

Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs 62x less per token.

Too close to call

Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report

API pricing

Cost per 1M tokens

GPT-4
Input
$30.00
Output
$60.00
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
Input
$0.16
186× cheaper
Output
$0.97
62× cheaper

Qwen3.6 35B A3B is cheaper on both: 186× input, 62× output.

Where to run it

11 hosts, cheapest first

GPT-42 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
Azure AI Foundry$30.00 in·$60.00 out·8k·100% upOpenAI$30.00 in·$60.00 out·8k·100% up
Qwen3.6 35B A3B9 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
DDarkbloomfp4$0.05 in·$0.70 out·262k·99.9% upAAkashMLfp8$0.10 in·$0.90 out·262k·100% upVVenicefp8$0.10 in·$1.00 out·256k·99.7% upPParasailfp8$0.15 in·$1.00 out·262k·99.6% upAAtlasCloudfp8$0.19 in·$1.11 out·262k·99.8% upPPhala$0.20 in·$1.27 out·262k·97.6% up
3 more hostsFewer hosts
SSiliconFlowfp8$0.24 in·$1.80 out·262k·94.5% upCCoreWeavefp8$0.25 in·$1.25 out·262k·100% upDDeepInfrafp8degraded$0.10 in·$0.95 out·262k·85.3% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 23 Sep 2026.

Writing DNA

Style Comparison

Similarity
41%

Qwen3.6 35B A3B uses 160.3x more emoji

GPT-4
Qwen3.6 35B A3B
59%Vocabulary59%
18wSentence Length15w
1.10Hedging0.31
0.8Bold4.9
2.5Lists2.7
0.00Emoji1.60
0.00Headings0.75
0.45Transitions0.05
Based on 15 + 27 text responses
Research

What we learned reading every model

FAQ

Common questions

GPT-4 is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.6 35B A3B is developed by Qwen. GPT-4 has a 8K token context window vs Qwen3.6 35B A3B's 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 26 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

It depends on your use case. GPT-4 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 26 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

GPT-4 costs $30/M input tokens and Qwen3.6 35B A3B costs $0.1612/M input tokens. Qwen3.6 35B A3B is $29.84/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-4 and Qwen3.6 35B A3B across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

Keep exploring

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

GPT-4 logoDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp logo
GPT-4 vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoSolar Pro 4 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Solar Pro 4Landed Sep 2026
GPT-4 logoHy3 logo
GPT-4 vs Hy3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.7 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.7 FlashLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4 logoLing 3.0 Flash logo
GPT-4 vs Ling 3.0 FlashLanded Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoMuse Glimmer 30B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Muse Glimmer 30BLanded Sep 2026
GPT-4 logoGLM 5.3 logo
GPT-4 vs GLM 5.3Landed Sep 2026
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoTernary Bonsai 2 27B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27BLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

GPT-4 logoGPT-4o (Omni) logo
GPT-4 vs GPT-4o (Omni)Version compare
GPT-4 logoGPT-6 Astra Pro logo
GPT-4 vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Flash logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 FlashSame lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoQwen3.8 Max (0902) logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Same lab
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoDeepSeek V3.1 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek V3.1New provider
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logoDeepSeek Prover V2 logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B vs DeepSeek Prover V2New provider
GPT-4 logoDeepSeek R1 logo
GPT-4 vs DeepSeek R1New provider
GPT-4 logoDeepSeek R1 0528 logo
GPT-4 vs DeepSeek R1 0528Same size

Model pages

GPT-4 logo
GPT-426 outputs, specs and price
Qwen3.6 35B A3B logo
Qwen3.6 35B A3B58 outputs, specs and price
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare Models
  • All Models
  • Image Comparison
  • Audio Comparison
  • Image Generation
  • Best AI For...
  • Arena
  • API Pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model Updates
  • Provider Status
  • AI Creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • RSS Feed