GPT-4o (Omni)vsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper than GPT-4o (Omni) at $0.11/M vs $2.5/M input tokens.
| Spec | GPT-4o (Omni) | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2.5/M tokens | $0.11/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $0.6/M tokens |
| Context window | 128K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | May 2024 | Jul 2025 |
Our Verdict
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, nothing separates them.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs 17x less per token.
Too close to call
Reviewing agent-written code?See a Brief PR report
API pricing
Cost per 1M tokens
GPT-4o (Omni)
Input
$2.50
Output
$10.00
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Input
$0.11
23× cheaper
Output
$0.60
17× cheaper
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is cheaper on both: 23× input, 17× output.
Where to run it
5 hosts, cheapest first
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 25073 hosts
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 13 Sep 2026.
Writing DNA
Style Comparison
Similarity
45%
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 39.4x more emoji
GPT-4o (Omni)
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
54%Vocabulary56%
18wSentence Length15w
0.72Hedging0.42
7.3Bold6.1
5.6Lists4.3
0.03Emoji0.99
1.40Headings0.70
0.26Transitions0.13
Based on 24 + 28 text responses
Research
What we learned reading every model
FAQ
Common questions
Keep exploring
More comparisons
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Ox AlphaNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Llama 4 MaverickNew provider
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs GPT-5Cross-provider
GPT-4o (Omni) vs MiniMax M3New provider
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Coder PlusCross-provider
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 MaxCross-provider
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Max ThinkingCross-provider
GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructCross-provider