GPT-4o (Omni) vs Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Compare GPT-4o (Omni) by OpenAI against Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 by Qwen, in 1 community votes, qwen: qwen3 235b a22b thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels, context windows of 128K vs 131K, tested across 39 shared challenges. Updated April 2026.
Which is better, GPT-4o (Omni) or Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is the better choice overall, winning 100% of 1 blind community votes on Rival. GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. Context windows: 128K vs 131K tokens. Compare their real outputs side by side below.
Key Differences Between GPT-4o (Omni) and Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
GPT-4o (Omni) is made by openai while Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is from qwen. GPT-4o (Omni) has a 128K token context window compared to Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's 131K. On pricing, GPT-4o (Omni) costs $2.5/M input tokens vs $0.11/M for Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In community voting, In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels.
In 1 community votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of head-to-head duels. Based on blind community voting from the Rival open dataset of 1+ human preference judgments for this pair.
Pick Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507. In 1 blind votes, Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 wins 100% of the time. That's not luck.
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 is 17x cheaper per token — worth considering if cost matters.
Style Comparison
Qwen: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 uses 21.5x more emoji
Ask them anything yourself







