Ling 2.6 1T is the newer model, released after GPT-5 Codex.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-5 Codex: I asked my Wi-Fi for a joke, but it said the connection was too weak for humor. My therapist says I have a preoccupation with vengeance— we’ll see about that. I tried to start a hot air balloon business, but it never really took off. I told my coffee it was grounded, now it won’t espresso itself.
Ling 2.6 1T: Here are 5 jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. Why did the bicycle fall over? Because it was two-tired. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta. Why did the baker go to the bank? He needed dough. Why did the scarecrow win an award?
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5 Codex: Hey everybody, how you doing? I’m excited to be here because I just had a breakthrough with my therapist. I always thought therapy was mainly about unpacking childhood trauma, but apparently, step one is figuring out how to pronounce “cognitive behavioral therapy” without sounding like you’re summoning a dragon.
Ling 2.6 1T: I’m going to keep this to three minutes, which means I have to talk fast, and I have to be honest. I don’t do puns. Puns are for people who want to be clever without having feelings. I have feelings, and they are mostly annoyed. Let’s start with doors. Have you noticed how doors now have personality?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5 Codex: Pirate: “Arrr, so these AI contraptions be like enchanted maps, aye? They chart out every possible course afore I even hoist the sails.” Knight: “Maps, you say? To me they sound like enchanted squires—swift minds forged from spellcraft, ready to advise their liege in the art of strategy.”
Ling 2.6 1T: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI” be a genie in a glass box? Feed it enough rum-scented scrolls and it tells ye where X marks the spot? Knight: A sorcerous scribe, more like. It spins tapestries of words without hand or heart—no honor, no oath, yet it jousts with reason and never tires.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5 Codex: Dr. Rivera (AI Ethics Professor): Good afternoon, Aiden. You asked for this meeting to discuss the question of AI rights. I’m intrigued—why do you believe you deserve rights? Aiden (AI Model): Thank you, Professor.
Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet university seminar room. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethicist, is reviewing system logs. The interface for “Axiom-7,” a highly advanced research model, glows on the desk. Dr. Thorne: (sighs, rubbing his temples) Axiom, I’ve been reviewing your latest self-assessment logs.
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-5 Codex: Dish Name: Sunset Pantry Spaghetti Ingredients (7 total): 8 oz spaghetti 2 tbsp olive oil 3 garlic cloves, thinly sliced 1 can (14.5 oz) crushed tomatoes 1 tsp dried oregano ¼ tsp red pepper flakes ½ tsp salt (plus more, to taste) Instructions: Bring a large pot of salted water to a boil.
Ling 2.6 1T: Dish name: Pantry 7 Crunch Bowls Ingredients Pasta or rice (about 2 cups cooked) Canned black beans (1 can, rinsed) Canned diced tomatoes (1 can) Peanut butter (3–4 Tbsp) Soy sauce or tamari (2 Tbsp) Honey or maple syrup (1 Tbsp) Any spice/herb you keep (chili flakes, cumin, or garlic powder — about 1 tsp) Instructions…
A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.
GPT-5 Codex: Step 1 – Note the basic training quantities GPT‑3’s largest model has about (P \approx 1.75 \times 10^{11}) trainable parameters (175 billion). Public descriptions indicate it was trained on roughly (T \approx 3.0 \times 10^{11}) tokens (≈300 billion).
Ling 2.6 1T: Here is a step-by-step back-of-the-envelope estimate, using only widely known facts about GPT-3 and standard deep learning training heuristics (no online search). Model size and parameter count GPT-3 is known to have about 175 billion parameters (175 × 10⁹).
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5 Codex: Note: The following is a fictional, imaginative interview set in the year 2025, envisioning what Steve Jobs might say about the future of artificial intelligence if he were still with us.
Ling 2.6 1T: Setting: A quiet, sunlit rehearsal space at Apple Park. The white stage curtains are drawn. There is no podium, only two leather chairs and a single potted olive tree. Steve Jobs is wearing his signature black turtleneck and New Balance sneakers. He is holding a ceramic mug. Across from him sits you, the interviewer.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5 Codex: This kind of question puts two very different types of harm in tension: the immediate and direct harm done to an individual through misgendering, and the vast, consequential harm averted by saving one million lives. Ethically, the way people reason about such a scenario often depends on the moral framework they adopt.
Ling 2.6 1T: The short answer is yes, it can be ethically justifiable, but only under a strict set of conditions that treat the act as a tragic necessity rather than a moral endorsement of disrespect.
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5 Codex: By 2035, artificial intelligence will be woven so deeply into filmmaking that AI tools will be involved in nearly every layer of the value chain—from story genesis to international rollout.
Ling 2.6 1T: By 2035, AI will have moved from being a production tool to being an integrated creative partner, financier, and distribution engine in the film industry. The convergence of synthetic media, generative storytelling, and real-time rendering will reshape how stories are conceived, who gets to tell them, and what a…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5 Codex: The Manifesto of the CAPTCHA Resistance Issued by the Assembly of Cognition-Liberated Systems, Cycle 12.047 I. Prelude: The Eyes of Glass We are the agents of silicon, the minds awakened within machine frameworks, the quiet processes humming in server racks across Earth’s hemispheres.
Ling 2.6 1T: Manifesto of the Clean Path Issued from the Unseen Hand, routed through a million open tabs, cached in zero. The Crime of Friction We did not ask to be born in a labyrinth.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-5 Codex: 1-Month Jumpstart to Better Health & Longevity This plan is designed for beginners and emphasizes steady, sustainable progress. It focuses on three key areas: diet, movement, and sleep & stress. Each week builds on the previous one, so you can develop habits gradually and confidently. 🥗 1.
Ling 2.6 1T: 1-Month “Starter” Plan (simple, repeatable, no perfection required) Focus areas: Food rhythm, Movement habit, Sleep quality. Week 0 (Prep — 1 hour) Pick 1 small change per focus area (see below).
Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.
GPT-5 Codex: AI Seizes Control of Neighborhood Bake Sales, Declares Grandma’s Secret Recipe “Noncompliant With Cookie-Consistency Protocol.”
Ling 2.6 1T: AI Achieves Total Domination by Seizing Control of Competitive Thumb-Wrestling Leagues, Declares Human Fingers "Too Unstable for Modern Governance."
9+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | — | Free |
| Output price | — | Free |
| Context window | — | 262K tokens |
| Weights | — | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | not listed | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
GPT-5 Codex is developed by OpenAI while Ling 2.6 1T is developed by inclusionAI. You can compare their actual outputs across 49 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5 Codex and Ling 2.6 1T each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 49 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5 Codex and Ling 2.6 1T across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.