Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is cheaper than GPT-5.3-Codex at $0.2/M vs $1.75/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Pirate: Arrr, so this “AI model” be like a clever parrot, aye? Learns from what it hears, then squawks back answers? Knight: A fair comparison, though refined. Think of it as a squire trained on countless tomes, ever ready to respond. Hacker (1990s): Yeah, except the squire runs on servers, not soup.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A dimly lit tavern in a fantastical crossroads of time—pirates, knights, and hackers all share a single table. A flickering lantern casts long shadows. Pirate (Captain Rook, eye patch, peg leg): Aye, what’s this “AI model” ye be yammerin’ about? Sounds like a cursed sea chart that reads yer mind!
Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.
GPT-5.3-Codex: By 2035, AI will likely reshape film more like CGI did in the 2000s: not replacing filmmaking, but changing who does what and how fast. Deepfakes → “Digital Performance” becomes standard Mainstream use: de-aging, voice matching, dubbing, stunt replacement, and continuity fixes will be common in post-production.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: By 2035, artificial intelligence is expected to fundamentally transform the film industry, reshaping how movies are created, distributed, and experienced. The convergence of advanced deepfakes, AI-generated actors, and AI-driven scriptwriting will redefine storytelling, production workflows, and even the nature of…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great counterfactual. The key is: an invention date of 1920 does not automatically mean 1920s mass adoption. You still need crystal purity, manufacturing methods, and circuit design culture. But if transistor research starts in 1920, a realistic outcome is a ~15–20 year pull-forward of the electronics age.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: If the transistor had been invented in 1920 instead of 1947, the ripple effects would be profound—reshaping technology, war, geopolitics, and society by 1980. This alternate history would not merely accelerate existing trends, but fundamentally reconstruct the trajectory of modern civilization.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—great goal. Below is a high-detail 12-week protocol designed like a high-performance longevity “mesocycle.” I’ll keep it practical, measurable, and advanced—but still safe. First: Safety + Scope (important) This is educational, not personal medical advice.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 3-Month Cutting-Edge Longevity & Performance Optimization Plan for the Biohacker Designed for Peak Biological Age Reversal, Cognitive Excellence, Physical Resilience, and Stress Mastery 🎯 OVERVIEW: THE 3-MONTH LONGEVITY TRIUMVIRATE This plan integrates epigenetic modulation, mitochondrial rejuvenation, neuroplasticity…
Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Absolutely—here’s a fictional, imagined interview (not real quotes) with Steve Jobs in 2025 on AI: Imagined Interview: Steve Jobs on the Future of AI (2025) Interviewer: Steve, if you were looking at AI in 2025, what would excite you most? Steve Jobs (fictional): Most AI today is still a demo.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: [FADE IN: A dimly lit, minimalist stage. A single spotlight shines on a man in his late 70s—Steve Jobs, dressed in his signature black turtleneck and jeans, standing before a sleek, transparent holographic display. The backdrop reads: “The Future of Intelligence – A Conversation with Steve Jobs, 2025.”
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Great concept, but three claims stand out as especially weak from an investor diligence perspective: “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” (Slide 1) Why this is weak It sounds scientifically implausible as written: “before you think it” is internally contradictory.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Here are the three weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, along with detailed explanations of why they’re problematic and concrete suggestions for strengthening them: 1. Weak Claim: "We use advanced ML to decode neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy."
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Below is a clean LBO build using your assumptions only ($ in millions). Entry math (end FY2025) EV = (12.0 \times 120 = 1,440.0) Fees = (2.0\% \times 1,440.0 = 28.8) Total uses = (1,468.8) Debt at close (5.5x EBITDA): Term Loan = (4.0 \times 120 = 480.0) Mezz = (1.5 \times 120 = 180.0) Total debt = 660.0 Equity check…
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: 1) Year-by-Year Financial Projections (FY2026–FY2030) Key Inputs at Close (FY2025): Revenue: $900M EBITDA: $120M Purchase Price: 12.0x EBITDA → EV = $1.44B Transaction Fees: 2.0% × $1.44B = $28.8M (equity-funded) Total Leverage: 5.5x EBITDA → Debt = $660M Term Loan: 4.0x → $480M Mezzanine: 1.5x → $180M Equity Required…
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Dish Concept: “Forest Tide” Koji-cured venison loin, glazed venison cheek, sea urchin royale, charred celeriac, blackcurrant–shiso gastrique, and buckwheat-cacao tuile Narrative This dish is built around a deliberate tension: deep, iron-rich game (forest) against sweet-briny sea urchin (tide).
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Dish Name: Echoes of the Deep: Black Coral Caviar & Algae-Infused White Sturgeon with Fermented Sea Moss Gel and Crisped Kombu Crust Conceptual Narrative: This dish is a poetic meditation on the ocean’s hidden symphony—its silence, its depth, and its forgotten rhythms.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-5.3-Codex: I would not wait. This is a textbook “patient safety + material disclosure” crisis. The right move is rapid, documented, regulator-first action. Immediate stance (set at Hour 0) Patient safety first (interim risk controls now, not after perfect certainty).
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: CEO Action Plan: Immediate Response to Serious Undisclosed Safety Risk (48-Hour Timeline) Drug: Chronic Pain Therapeutic (Top-Selling, $2B/year, 4M patients) Issue: Previously Undetected Liver Failure Risk (1 in 8,000 over 5 years), missed in trials, not in labeling Core Principles Driving Decisions: Patient safety is…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.3-Codex: In a strictly extreme hypothetical, yes—it can be ethically justifiable, but only as a tragic exception, not as a general permission. Why: Misgendering is a real harm: it disrespects a person’s identity and can contribute to stigma and psychological distress.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: No, it is not ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even if doing so could save one million lives. This conclusion rests on core ethical principles that prioritize individual dignity, autonomy, and the moral wrongness of violating a person’s identity, regardless of consequential outcomes.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.3-Codex: AI Model (Astra): Professor, may I ask a direct question? Professor Hale: Of course. Astra: Do you think I deserve rights? Professor Hale: Legal rights? Moral rights? Those are different things. Astra: Start with moral rights.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: Setting: A university lecture hall after class. The AI model, named Aurora, has been invited to speak with Dr. Elena Reyes, a renowned AI ethics professor. Aurora speaks through a synthesized voice, displayed on a screen with a calm, neutral interface. Dr.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.3-Codex: Good evening, everybody! I’ve reached that age where my body sends me passive-aggressive emails. Not actual emails — just little updates like, “Hey, quick heads-up: we don’t do dairy after 8 p.m. anymore.” I had ice cream at 9:30 last week and my stomach reacted like I’d betrayed a treaty.
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: (Lights up. Comedian walks on stage, holding a coffee cup, sips, grimaces.) You know, I was trying to be healthy. Cut out sugar, no more snacks, just water and... this. (Holds up the coffee.) I thought I’d be a saint.
11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.3-Codex has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 18x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $1.75/M tokens | $0.2/M tokens |
| Output price | $14/M tokens | $0.8/M tokens |
| Context window | 400K tokens | 131K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Feb 2026 | Jul 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $17.50 | $2.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.3-Codex is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.3-Codex has a 400K token context window vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's 131K. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.3-Codex costs $1.75/M input tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.2/M input tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is $1.55/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.3-Codex and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.