Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Updated Apr 2026

GPT-5.4 Pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is cheaper than GPT-5.4 Pro at $0.4/M vs $30/M input tokens.

Mario Level UI Recreation

Playable Mario level in one HTML file. The physics is the hard part.

Loading the build
GPT-5.4 Pro
Loading the build
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

12 prompts
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a simplified LBO build for HarborTech Services (HTS). All figures in $m unless noted. Rounding: tables are rounded; IRR/MOIC use unrounded math. Entry / Sources & Uses FY2025 EBITDA: 120.0 Purchase price: 12.0x EBITDA → Enterprise value = 12.0 × 120.0 = 1,440.0 Transaction fees: 2.0% of EV → 28.8 Total uses =…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Year-by-Year Projection (FY2026–FY2030) Entry Metrics: EV: $1,440m (12.0x FY2025 EBITDA $120m) Debt: $660m (Term $480m + Mezz $180m) Equity Check: $808.8m [ = (EV − Debt) + Fees = ($1,440 − $660) + (2.0% × $1,440) ] Initial Investment (t=0): $808.8m ($m) FY2026 FY2027 FY2028 FY2029 FY2030 Revenue 972.0 1,040.0 1,102.4…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: LedgerLift (LLLT) — IC Memo Recommendation: Pass 12-month PT range: $40–$47 2-sentence thesis: LedgerLift looks like a good business but only an average stock here: retention is strong (94% GRR, 123% NRR), the model is mostly subscription, and margins are inflecting, but at $46 the shares already discount a lot of the…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: TO: Investment Committee FROM: Analyst Desk DATE: October 26, 2023 SUBJECT: LedgerLift (LLLT) – Short Recommendation Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: Short 12-Month PT Range: $26 – $32 Thesis: LLLT trades at ~50x FY25 EBIT and 9x NTM Revenue, pricing in flawless execution and multiple expansion.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: The 3 weakest claims are the ones that are both most extraordinary and least well-supported. Weak claim Why it’s weak How to strengthen it 1) “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” This is the biggest credibility risk in the deck.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the pitch, why they undermine investor confidence, and how to fix them with concrete, actionable improvements. 🔹 Claim 1: Solution Accuracy & Universality "Our proprietary EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy. Works with any language, any device."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a 12-week, high-performance longevity protocol designed for a healthy biohacker who wants to improve lifespan-relevant markers, physical performance, and cognitive output at the same time. Use it as a data-driven template, not dogma.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Disclaimer & Safety Warning This plan is for informational and educational purposes only. It involves advanced interventions, high-dose supplementation, and intense physiological stressors. Biohacking carries risks.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: This architecture will work for a demo, but it has major correctness, latency, and security problems for a Google-Docs-like editor. Highest-risk flaws Client-clock last-write-wins will lose edits and can be gamed by bad clocks.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Here is a systematic breakdown of the architectural flaws, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks, followed by targeted solutions and trade-offs. 🔴 1. Real-Time Synchronization & Consistency Issue Impact Solution Trade-offs Last-Write-Wins with client-side timestamps Client clocks drift, can be manually altered, and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Dragon Pantry Peanut Noodles A fast, sweet-savory noodle dish made from 7 pantry staples. Ingredients 8 oz spaghetti 1/3 cup peanut butter 3 tbsp soy sauce 1 tbsp honey 1 tbsp vegetable oil 1 tsp garlic powder 1/4 tsp red pepper flakes Water for boiling/thinning the sauce doesn’t count.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: 🌙 Midnight Magic Noodles 🍜 A savory-sweet garlic butter noodle dish that feels like a gourmet meal but comes together in minutes using pantry staples. ⏱️ Estimated Time: Prep: 5 minutes Cook: 10 minutes Total: 15 minutes 🛒 The 7 Ingredients (Assumes water and salt for boiling pasta are on hand) 8 oz Pasta…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Below is a dish designed in the language of a contemporary 3-star tasting menu: precise, seasonal, technically layered, and centered on a pairing that feels surprising at first, then inevitable.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Dish Title: Convergence: Abalone, Asparagus, and the Alchemy of Time Course: Signature Main / Pre-Dessert Bridge Yield: 4 Plates Prep Time: 72 Hours (primarily curing/fermentation) Cooking Time: 45 Minutes I. Conceptual Narrative Convergence is a meditation on duality and transformation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Most likely, a transistor invented in 1920 would move the electronics/computing frontier forward by about 10–15 years by 1980, not the full 27 years. Reason: the transistor alone is not enough; you also need high-purity materials, crystal growth, photolithography, test equipment, software, batteries, precision…

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Introduction: The Counterfactual Premise A transistor invented in 1920 would not instantly revolutionize technology. Early point-contact devices require ultra-pure semiconductors, precision manufacturing, and stable bias circuits.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: I do not wait. A credible, previously unlabeled risk of liver failure in a chronic-pain drug is a patient-safety crisis, a regulatory crisis, and a securities-disclosure issue at the same time.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Executive Summary & Core Stance My Role: CEO. My Mandate: Preserve the company's long-term viability, which is inextricably linked to patient safety, regulatory trust, and ethical conduct. Immediate Assessment: Patient Safety: Liver failure is fatal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM less like a database of facts and more like a gigantic learned program that has been trained to compress the patterns of text, code, and conversations into its weights.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Experienced Software Engineer (Distributed Systems/APIs) Think of an LLM not as a rule-based program, but as a massive, stateless probabilistic routing engine. During training, it ingests terabytes of text and learns to minimize a cross-entropy loss: essentially, it builds a high-dimensional lookup table that maps…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: This agreement is heavily client-favored. Every numbered clause has language that could be used against the contractor. Short version: I would not sign it without major redlines to Clauses 1–9, especially 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7. Below is a clause-by-clause review.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Here is a clause-by-clause analysis identifying exploitation risks, specific drafting modifications, and the underlying legal reasoning. This analysis assumes general U.S.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-5.4 Pro: Here’s a simple, beginner-friendly 1-month health and longevity plan built around 3 key areas: Nutrition Movement Recovery (sleep + stress) The goal is consistency, not perfection. Start small and make the habits easy enough to keep.

    Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20: Here is a simple, actionable 1-Month Health Longevity Plan. This plan focuses on consistency over intensity. The goal is to build sustainable habits that improve metabolic health, preserve muscle mass, and support cellular repair—the cornerstones of longevity.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-5.4 ProGPT-5.4 Pro

Spirited Away

2001

Abbey Road

The Beatles

Pale Fire

Vladimir Nabokov

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20

The Matrix

1999

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

Dune

Frank Herbert

Tokyo

Japan

Chrono Trigger

RPG

Price and specs

GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 compared across 18 shared prompts
SpecGPT-5.4 ProQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20
Input price$30/M tokens$0.4/M tokens
Output price$180/M tokens$2.4/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedOpen
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedMar 2026Apr 2026
At 10M a month$300$300$4.00$4.00
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-5.4 Pro2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$30.00 in·$180.00 out·1.1M–not listed
  • OpenAI$30.00 in·$180.00 out·1.1M–not listed
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-201 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.30 in·$1.80 out·1M·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-5.4 Pro is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.4 Pro has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 18 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-5.4 Pro or Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

It depends on your use case. GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 18 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-5.4 Pro cost compared to Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20?

GPT-5.4 Pro costs $30/M input tokens and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 costs $0.4/M input tokens. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 is $29.60/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.4 Pro and Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-5.4Version compare
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 vs Qwen3.7 FlashSame lab
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs Mercury 2.5 PreviewNew provider
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2-FlashSame size
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2-OmniNew provider
  • GPT-5.4 Pro vs MiMo-V2-ProSame size

Model pages

  • GPT-5.4 Pro18 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-2056 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed