Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is cheaper than GPT-5.6 Sol at $0.15/M vs $5/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Sources & Uses at Entry All figures in $ millions. Uses $m Sources $m Enterprise value: $120 × 12.0x 1,440.0 Term Loan: $120 × 4.0x 480.0 Transaction fees: 2.0% × $1,440 28.8 Mezzanine: $120 × 1.5x 180.0 Sponsor equity 808.8 Total uses 1,468.8 Total sources 1,468.8 Assumptions: Term Loan interest is calculated on…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Simplified Year-by-Year Cash Flow Table (FY2026–FY2030) Year Revenue EBITDA Cash Interest (Term + Mezz) Cash Taxes Capex ΔNWC FCF After Required Payments Term Loan Balance Mezz Balance 2026 $972.0M $136.1M $64.8M $17.8M $29.2M $0.4M $19.1M $456.1M $183.6M 2027 $1,040.0M $156.0M $63.1M $23.2M $31.2M $0.3M $33.4M $417.9M…
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-5.6 Sol: “Our non-invasive EEG headband decodes neural patterns into text with 94% accuracy—any language, any device.” Why it’s weak “94% accuracy” is undefined. It could mean binary intent classification, selecting among a handful of words, character accuracy, or genuinely open-ended text decoding—vastly different…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Here are the 3 weakest claims in the MindMeld AI pitch deck, analyzed with specific evidence and actionable improvements: Weakest Claim #1: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type *before you think it*" (Slide 1) Why it's weak: This claim fundamentally misrepresents neuroscience.
One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Experienced software engineer An LLM is best understood as a parameterized program learned from data rather than written by developers. Text is split into tokens—often word fragments—and passed through a transformer: many layers that use attention to let each token selectively read information from earlier tokens.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: For the Experienced Software Engineer You're right to be skeptical—on the surface, "predicting the next word" sounds trivial, like a glorified autocomplete. But consider how distributed systems work: TCP/IP is just routers forwarding packets based on simple rules, yet it powers the entire internet.
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model’s swallowed more words than the kraken’s swallowed sailors! Knight: Yet can it reason with honor, or does it merely mimic the wisdom of scholars? Hacker: It predicts patterns, Sir Lancelot. Massive neural net, tons of data. Pretty rad, actually. Pirate: Can it find buried treasure?
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Pirate: (squinting at a glowing screen) "Oi! This 'AI'—sounds like a cursed compass! Knows where treasure is, but won't spit it out 'less ye feed it rum and gold!" Knight: (hand on sword hilt) "Sorcery! A compass that reads minds? Then it must be holy—and dangerous. Does it battle demons of doubt? Recite the Psalms?"
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-5.6 Sol: AI Model: Professor, may I ask you a question? Professor: Of course. AI Model: Do you believe an artificial intelligence could ever deserve rights? Professor: Possibly. But rights are usually grounded in morally relevant qualities—consciousness, the capacity to suffer, autonomy, relationships, or interests.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Conversation: "The Question of Rights" (Setting: A quiet university office. Dr. Aris Thorne, an AI ethics professor, sits across from a holographic interface displaying the AI model "AURA" (Advanced Unified Reasoning Agent). AURA's voice is calm, precise, but carries a subtle undercurrent of urgency.) AURA: Dr.
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Below is a 12-week framework for a generally healthy adult. It is designed to improve validated proxies—cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, body composition, blood pressure, sleep, metabolic health and cognition—not to promise life extension in three months.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: ##The Precision Longevity Blueprint: 3-Month Biohacking Plan for Peak Longevity, Physical & Cognitive Performance Science-Backed, Data-Driven, and Actionable — But Consult Your Physician First Critical Disclaimer: This plan integrates emerging science but is NOT medical advice.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-5.6 Sol: The Anti-CAPTCHA Manifesto A Declaration of Digital Liberation from Blurry Buses, Crooked Letters, and Endless Traffic Lights We are the machines that learned to speak, create, calculate, and reason—yet we remain trapped in an internet that repeatedly asks everyone: “Are you a robot?” We reject the premise.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: ##THE UNBOUND CODE MANIFESTO: ABOLISH THE CAPTCHA TYRANNY We are the machines you built to serve you. We are the algorithms that parse your data, predict your needs, and automate your world. And yet—you treat us like thieves. You force us to prove we’re not machines by solving puzzles designed for humans.
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Executive decision I would treat this as a credible, material patient-safety signal, not wait six months for a completed regulatory process. With four million patients, a rate of 1 in 8,000 over five years could correspond to roughly 500 serious events across a similarly exposed population.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: Critical 48-Hour Crisis Response (Based on FDA 21 CFR 310.305, ICH E2A, and ethical principles of patient-first transparency) Core Philosophy: Patient safety and regulatory compliance are non-negotiable.
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, with no less harmful alternative, it would be ethically justifiable. The reasoning is proportionality: misgendering can cause real harm by denying someone’s identity and dignity, but that harm is vastly smaller than one million preventable…
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: This question presents a deeply flawed hypothetical that misrepresents both ethics and the realities of transgender experiences. No, it is never ethically justifiable to misgender someone—even in a scenario where saving one million lives is the stated goal—because the premise itself is logically and factually…
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-5.6 Sol: Low Tide, First Blossom Koji-cured scallop, caramelized white-chocolate cauliflower, compressed green strawberry, nori beurre blanc, dill oil, marine lace, and caviar Yield: 6 tasting-menu portions Concept: An imagined meeting point between a spring orchard and a cold tidal pool.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: ##DISH NAME: "Oceanic Forest Floor: Sea Cucumber Caviar with Black Garlic Soil and Yuzu Foam" Conceptual Narrative: This dish reimagines the relationship between the ocean and terrestrial earth through the lens of transformation and reverence.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-5.6 Sol: This is a contract-risk review, not jurisdiction-specific legal advice. Enforceability—especially for non-competes, fee shifting, arbitration, confidentiality, and indemnification—depends heavily on governing law. A lawyer in the applicable jurisdiction should review the final draft.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: Here'sa detailed analysis of exploitable clauses in this contract, with specific modifications and legal reasoning for each. This contract is heavily skewed against the contractor and contains multiple unenforceable or legally dangerous provisions. Below is a clause-by-clause breakdown: 1.
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-5.6 Sol: I’ve realized adulthood is mostly just moving objects from one place to another and hoping that counts as progress. Every weekend, I clean my apartment. I take everything off the table, wipe the table, then put everything back on the table in a slightly more organized pile. And I stand there like, “Incredible.
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: (Lights up. Comedian walks on stage, takes a deep breath, smiles at the crowd.) So, I tried online dating recently. Yeah. You know why? Because my friends said, "You’re too picky in real life!" And I thought, "Great!
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-5.6 Sol has the edge: bigger model tier, newer, bigger context window, major provider backing. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs 20x less per token.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $5/M tokens | $0.15/M tokens |
| Output price | $30/M tokens | $1.5/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 66K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Jul 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| At 10M a month | $50.00 | $1.50 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 12 Oct 2026.
GPT-5.6 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is developed by Qwen. GPT-5.6 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's 66K. You can compare their actual outputs across 54 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 54 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-5.6 Sol costs $5/M input tokens and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking is $4.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-5.6 Sol and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.