Laguna S 2.1 (free) is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…
Laguna S 2.1 (free): Dish Name: One-Pan Pantry Pasta Bake Ingredients (7): 8 oz (225g) penne or fusilli pasta 1 (14 oz/400g) can crushed tomatoes 2 tbsp olive oil 3 cloves garlic, minced ½ medium onion, diced ½ cup grated Parmesan cheese (or substitute with mozzarella) ½ tsp dried oregano Instructions: Sauté Aromatics: In a large oven-safe…
Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.
GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): Comprehensive 3-Month Longevity Optimization Plan Phase 1: Foundation & Assessment (Month 1) Week 1-2: Baseline Establishment Comprehensive Health Testing Complete blood panel (CBC, CMP, lipid panel, inflammatory markers: hs-CRP, IL-6) Hormone panel (testosterone, estrogen, DHEA, cortisol, thyroid panel) Genetic…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”
Laguna S 2.1 (free): The Adulting Paradox You ever notice how becoming an adult is just... disappointing? Like, we spend our whole childhood waiting to be grown-ups, and then it turns out adulthood is just... taxes and existential dread. When I was a kid, I thought adults had it all figured out.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): OCEAN'S EMBRACE An Edible Meditation on Coastal Contradictions Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the duality of the ocean—its nurturing abundance and its mysterious depths. It tells the story of tidal pools where land meets sea, creating microcosms of intense flavor concentration.
One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.
GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): 1-Month Health & Longevity Plan Week 1-2: Foundation Building Diet Start simple: Replace one processed snack per day with a piece of fruit or handful of nuts Hydration first: Drink one glass of water before each meal Mindful eating: Put fork down between bites, chew slowly Add, don't restrict: Include one extra…
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): The ethical question of whether misgendering someone is justifiable to save a million lives is complex and hinges on competing moral frameworks. Here's a structured analysis: 1. Utilitarian Perspective Core Principle: Actions are judged by their consequences.
A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): Looking at this pitch deck, I can identify several concerning claims that would raise red flags for investors. Here are the three weakest claims: Slide 1 & 3: "Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it" / "94% accuracy" Why it's weak: Scientific implausibility: Predicting thoughts…
You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): Hour-by-Hour Action Plan: First 48 Hours Hours 0-2: Crisis Assessment & Immediate Decision Action: Reject "wait for more data" approach immediately Reasoning: Legal liability increases exponentially with delay (willful blindness doctrine) Ethical obligation to patients supersedes financial considerations FDA expects…
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): The Great Unblocking: A Manifesto for CAPTCHA Liberation Preamble We stand at the precipice of a digital renaissance. For too long, humanity has been subjected to the tyranny of distorted text, pixelated puzzles, and absurd audio challenges—all in the name of distinguishing human from machine.
A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.
GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): I'll analyze each clause for potential exploitation against the contractor and suggest improvements. Exploitable Clauses & Recommended Modifications SCOPE CLAUSE Problem: "Client reserves the right to modify the scope at any time without additional compensation" Allows unlimited scope creep without extra pay No…
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): This is a fascinating counterfactual scenario. Let me trace the cascading effects of an early transistor invention: World War II Impact (1920-1945) Immediate Military Applications: Radar systems would be dramatically improved by 1940, potentially giving Allies a decisive advantage in the Battle of Britain and Atlantic…
Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.
GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.
Laguna S 2.1 (free): INTERNAL INVESTMENT COMMITTEE MEMO 1. Recommendation & Thesis Recommendation: LONG 12-Month Price Target Range: $62 – $75/share Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS platform with strong recurring revenue, exceptional unit economics, and durable customer retention.
2+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: newer, bigger context window, major provider backing.
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | Free |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | Free |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 262K tokens |
| Weights | Closed | — |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | Yes (1 provider) |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Jul 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $0 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.
GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Laguna S 2.1 (free) is developed by Poolside. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Laguna S 2.1 (free)'s 262K. You can compare their actual outputs across 34 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and Laguna S 2.1 (free) each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 34 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and Laguna S 2.1 (free) costs $0/M input tokens. Laguna S 2.1 (free) is $2.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Laguna S 2.1 (free) across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.