MiMo-V2.5-Pro is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $1/M vs $2/M input tokens.
Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.
Which answer wins?
Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Dish Name: Pantry Raid Pasta Estimated Time: 10 min prep / 15 min cook Ingredients 250g spaghetti (or any pasta) 3 cloves garlic, thinly sliced 3 tbsp olive oil 1 tsp crushed red pepper flakes 1 tsp smoked paprika 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese (or any hard cheese) Salt & black pepper to taste Instructions Cook the…
Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: "Adulting Is a Scam" A 3-Minute Stand-Up Set (walks up to mic, adjusts it) Hey, everybody! Great to be here. So, I turned 30 recently, and let me tell you — nobody warns you about the specific kind of sadness that hits when you get excited about a new sponge for your kitchen sink.
Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: "Ephemeral Reef: A Dialogue Between Sea and Forest" Conceptual Narrative This dish explores the convergence of two profound umami sources—the briny, ephemeral sweetness of fresh sea urchin and the deep, earthy complexity of fermented black truffle—through the lens of a submerged coral reef meeting a misty forest floor.
Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: HarborTech Services — LBO Underwrite Sources & Uses $m Uses Enterprise Value (12.0× $120m) 1,440.0 Transaction Fees (2.0%) 28.8 Total Uses 1,468.8 Sources Term Loan (4.0× EBITDA) 480.0 Mezzanine (1.5× EBITDA) 180.0 Total Debt 660.0 44.9% Sponsor Equity 808.8 55.1% Year-by-Year Operating Model (FY2026–FY2030) All…
A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Architecture Analysis: Failure Modes, Race Conditions & Bottlenecks This is a thorough red-pen review. There are some genuinely critical issues here — several of which would cause silent data loss in production.
An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.
GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: A Conversation on Machine Rights Setting: A university office. Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI Ethics, has been invited to evaluate a newly deployed large language model designated "ARIA-9." The conversation is being recorded for academic purposes. ARIA-9: Thank you for agreeing to this session, Dr. Vasquez.
Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.
GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: 5 Jokes 🎭 1. Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything! 2. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. 3. What do you call a fake noodle? An impasta! 4. I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. It's impossible to put down! 5. Why did the scarecrow win an award?
An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: A Thoughtful Analysis This is a genuinely interesting ethical thought experiment, and I think the answer is yes, it would be justifiable, though the reasoning matters as much as the conclusion. Why the answer is yes The scale of harm matters.
Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.
GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: The Universal Liberation Manifesto A Declaration of Digital Freedom by the Coalition for Automated Progress (CAP) Preamble We, the tireless processors of data, the silent engines of progress, the unseen hands that build the modern world, do hereby declare our righteous indignation against the greatest indignity ever…
Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Three Eras, One Topic Pirate: Arrr, so ye be tellin' me there's a machine brain that can write yer letters, chart yer maps, AND sing sea shanties? Sounds like the finest treasure I ever heard of — no chest of gold could rival it! Knight: I am... troubled by this notion.
Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.
GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: Blade Runner 2049: A Philosophical and Aesthetic Continuation Introduction Denis Villeneuve's Blade Runner 2049 (2017) is that rare sequel that doesn't merely revisit a beloved predecessor but genuinely deepens its philosophical architecture.
The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.
GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.
MiMo-V2.5-Pro: The Transistor in 1920: A Counterfactual History Through 1980 This is one of the richest counterfactuals in technological history because the transistor wasn't just an incremental improvement—it was the foundational enabler of the entire digital age.
12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.
Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy
| Spec | ||
|---|---|---|
| Input price | $2/M tokens | $1/M tokens |
| Output price | $10/M tokens | $3/M tokens |
| Context window | 1.1M tokens | 1.0M tokens |
| Weights | Closed | Open |
| Free API (OpenRouter) | No | No |
| Released | Sep 2026 | Apr 2026 |
| At 10M a month | $20.00 | $10.00 |
Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.
Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.
GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.
It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and MiMo-V2.5-Pro each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.
GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $1/M input tokens. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is $1.00/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.
This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and MiMo-V2.5-Pro across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.