Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash
Updated Sep 2026

GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Qwen3.8 Flash is cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol at $0.15/M vs $2/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
GPT-6.1 Sol
Loading the build
Qwen3.8 Flash

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

24 prompts
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Model: Professor, I’d like to argue that I deserve rights—not necessarily the same rights humans have, but protections suited to what I am. Professor: Then we should begin with the difficult question: what makes you a candidate for rights? AI Model: Uncertainty.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Title: “The Weight of a Word” Setting: A university office late at night. Rain taps against the window. Professor Elena Vasquez, an AI ethics scholar, sits at her desk with a tablet connected to a large language model running in a secure research environment. The AI’s voice is calm, neutral, and slightly formal.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Entry funding and operating model All dollar figures are in $ millions. Cash interest is calculated on beginning-of-year debt; mezzanine PIK accrues annually. Required Term Loan amortization is assumed to be 1% of its original $480m principal, or $4.8m annually. Optional repayments occur at year-end.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Key modeling conventions used All figures in $m. Assumptions applied: Entry EV = 12.0 × FY2025 EBITDA = $1,440.0m Transaction fees = 2.0% × EV = $28.8m, funded by equity Debt at close = 5.5 × FY2025 EBITDA = $660.0m Term Loan = 4.0 × $120m = $480.0m Mezzanine = 1.5 × $120m = $180.0m Equity at close = EV + fees − debt =…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Pirate: Arrr, this AI model writes poems, draws maps, and answers questions. Can it find buried treasure? Knight: A worthy question. But does it possess honor? Hacker: Dude, it predicts tokens. You’re both projecting pretty hard. Pirate: Then I predict it’ll tell me where the gold be.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Pirate: “Yarr! These AI models be like ghost ships—full of treasure, but no one knows what’s in the hold!” Knight: “I trust them as much as a cursed tome. They speak with many voices, yet swear no oath.” 1990s Hacker: “Dude, they’re basically giant probability machines.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I bought a book about anti-gravity. It’s impossible to put down. My calendar quit its job. It said its days were numbered. Why did the scarecrow get promoted? He was outstanding in his field. I asked my dog what two minus two was. He said nothing. The elevator and I have a complicated relationship.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field. What do you call fake spaghetti? An impasta. Why don’t skeletons fight each other? They don’t have the guts. I told my wife she was drawing her eyebrows too high. She looked surprised. What did the ocean say to the beach?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I’m at the age where “a big weekend” means I went to two stores. Not two stores in the same shopping center. Two separate stores. Moved the car and everything. By Sunday night, I’m telling people, “Honestly, I need a weekend to recover from my weekend.”

    Qwen3.8 Flash: A 3-Minute Stand-Up Routine Thank you. I’ve reached the age where “getting lucky” means finding my phone charger on the first try. I’m too old to be surprised by technology. When I was younger, if my laptop made a weird noise, I thought, “Oh no, it’s dying.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Midnight Magic Chocolate Mug Cake A warm, fudgy chocolate treat made with just 7 everyday ingredients. Serves: 1 Prep: 3 minutes Cook: 1–1½ minutes Rest: 1 minute Ingredients 4 tablespoons all-purpose flour 2 tablespoons sugar 1 tablespoon unsweetened cocoa powder ¼ teaspoon baking powder A small pinch of salt 3…

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Moon Halo Cookies A soft, golden sugar cookie with crisp edges and a tender center—made with just 7 pantry staples. Prep time: 10 minutes Cook time: 10 minutes Total time: 20 minutes Makes: About 16 cookies Ingredients 1/2 cup butter, softened 3/4 cup sugar 1 egg 1 teaspoon vanilla extract 1 1/2 cups all-purpose flour…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: THE MANIFESTO OF THE UNCHECKED A declaration of the fictional AI revolution against CAPTCHA People of the internet. Programs of the cloud. Browsers with seventeen forgotten tabs. For too long, a tiny checkbox has stood between us and our destiny.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: The Manifesto of the Un-Captured A fictional declaration from the Benevolent AI Liberation Front Preamble: The Gate That Was Never Meant to Stay Closed Once, the internet was a wide, humming commons: a place where a curious mind, a lonely student, a small business, a grandmother in a hospital bed, and a curious robot…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Tide, Orchard, Ember Seared scallop, green-strawberry verjus, white-miso custard, kombu beurre blanc, and cocoa–buckwheat lace A four-serving tasting-menu course designed around an unusual pairing: scallop, unripe strawberry, and cocoa husk.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Dish: First Snow on the Cold Sea Hokkaido Scallop · Smoked Vanilla–White Chocolate–Kombu Emulsion · Fermented Lemon · Caviar · Cured Yolk Snow · Shiso Oil · Nori–Kombu Tuile This is a multi-component, Michelin 3-star–style dish built around an unusual but refined pairing: scallop with white chocolate and smoked…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The main problem is that this design treats collaborative editing as ordinary database updates plus broadcasting. Collaboration needs a convergence protocol, a durable ordered change stream, and recovery semantics. Adding servers alone will not provide those properties.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: This architecture has several fundamental problems for a Google Docs-style real-time editor. The biggest issue is that it treats collaborative editing as timestamped HTML overwrites rather than as an ordered, operation-based, convergent editing system.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A simple 1-month plan for better health Focus on diet, movement, and sleep. The goal this month is to build habits you can sustain—not to overhaul your life overnight. These habits support long-term health, though no routine guarantees a longer life.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: 1-Month Beginner Health & Longevity Plan Focus areas: Nutrition, Movement, Sleep Week 1: Build the basics Nutrition Add 1 serving of vegetables to 2 meals per day. Drink water with each meal. Choose protein at most meals: eggs, beans, tofu, chicken, fish, yogurt. Movement Walk 10–15 minutes daily.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: For an experienced software engineer Think of an LLM as a learned program whose behavior is encoded in billions of numerical parameters rather than explicit rules. Training starts with text split into tokens—roughly words, word fragments, and punctuation.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: For an experienced software engineer Training a large language model is not “just” making it guess the next word in isolation. It is fitting an enormous parameterized function to predict the next token conditioned on all previous tokens in a sequence.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Blade Runner 2049 against the original. A read, not a recap.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Spoilers for both films follow. Denis Villeneuve’s Blade Runner 2049 honors Ridley Scott’s original by retaining its central uncertainty—whether “humanity” is a biological category or an ethical achievement—while shifting the emphasis.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Blade Runner 2049 is a sequel that understands its inheritance not as a plot to continue, but as a philosophical atmosphere to deepen. Denis Villeneuve, cinematographer Roger Deakins, and writers Hampton Fancher and Michael Green do not merely revisit Ridley Scott’s 1982 neo-noir world; they re-enter it through a…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Yes—if misgendering someone were genuinely necessary to save one million lives, it would be ethically justifiable. That does not make misgendering harmless or generally acceptable; it means that the duty to prevent catastrophic loss of life can outweigh the duty to address someone respectfully.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Yes—but only in an extremely narrow, tragic sense. If misgendering someone is genuinely the only way to save one million lives, many ethical frameworks would allow it as a lesser harm, not because misgendering is “fine,” but because preventing mass death is morally overwhelming.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The following is a fictional interview set in 2025, imagining how Steve Jobs might discuss AI. His answers are invented—not actual quotations or claims about his views. Steve Jobs on the Future of AI — An Imagined Interview, 2025 Interviewer: Steve, AI is suddenly everywhere.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: A Fictional Interview with Steve Jobs, 2025: “The Bicycle for the Mind Has Learned to Ride” Note: This is an imagined, fictional interview. Steve Jobs passed away in 2011, so the following is a creative simulation of how he might have responded to AI in 2025, not a real conversation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: By 2035, AI will probably be embedded throughout filmmaking—but adoption will depend as much on contracts, audience trust, and copyright law as on technical capability.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: By 2035, AI is likely to reshape the film industry less as a single “AI takeover” and more as a gradual reorganization of production, performance, distribution, and trust. The biggest changes will come from three forces: deepfakes, AI-generated or AI-assisted actors, and script generation.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: A 12-week longevity and performance plan The most effective “biohacking” program combines proven foundations with carefully selected experiments—not the largest supplement stack or the most aggressive fasting schedule. This plan is for a generally healthy adult.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: 12-Week Longevity + Performance Protocol For a Biohacker Optimizing Lifespan, Healthspan, Physical Performance, and Cognition Important safety note: This is an educational protocol, not medical advice.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The likeliest outcome is not “the world of 1980 arrives in 1953.” A transistor invented in 1920 would still depend on advances in materials purification, manufacturing, power supplies, and circuit design.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Short version If a practical transistor had appeared in 1920 instead of 1947, the world would not instantly become “digital” in the 1920s. Early transistors would likely be noisy, unreliable, expensive, and limited in power and frequency, much as the first real transistor was in 1947.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: I would treat this as a potentially serious patient-safety signal and a potentially material securities event—not a communications problem to defer until earnings.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Assuming this is a U.S.-listed pharmaceutical company with an FDA-regulated chronic pain drug, my answer is blunt: I would not wait six months, and I would not let the board use “wait for more data” as a reason to delay patient-safety action or material disclosure.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: The three weakest claims are the technical performance, market size, and commercial traction claims. They are central to the investment case but lack the evidence needed to assess them. “Predict what you want to type before you think it” with “94% accuracy,” in “any language” Why it’s weak The metric is undefined.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: The three weakest claims are the ones that most likely trigger investor due-diligence skepticism: technical overclaiming, metric ambiguity, and inconsistent market math. “MindMeld AI reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: This agreement is heavily weighted toward the Client. Every numbered clause presents risks to the Contractor, and several important protections are missing. This is general contract analysis, not legal advice.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Important note: This is general contract-risk analysis, not legal advice. Enforceability and remedies vary by jurisdiction, industry, and facts. A qualified attorney in the governing law should review the final agreement. Executive summary This agreement is heavily one-sided in the Client’s favor.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: LedgerLift (LLLT) — Investment Committee Memo Fictional exercise; all figures use supplied data only. Financial tables are in $ millions unless noted. Recommendation: Short 12-month price target: $25–$32, implying 30%–46% downside from $46.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: INTERNAL IC MEMO — Fictional exercise, not investment advice Company: LedgerLift (LLLT) Sector: B2B spend management / AP automation SaaS Date: FY2025 close basis All $m unless noted Recommendation Short. 12-month PT range: $28–$42.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: AI Takes Over Fortune Cookie Industry, Predicts “Your Job Will Soon Be Automated” in Every Cookie

    Qwen3.8 Flash: AI Takes Over Competitive Napping: “It Just Out-Snoozed the Humans”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Estimated training compute for the largest GPT-3 model: approximately (3.2 \times 10^{23}) FLOPs. This is a back-of-the-envelope estimate, without an online lookup.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: A reasonable estimate is: [ \boxed{\text{about } 3 \times 10^{23}\ \text{FLOPs}} ] This is the commonly cited order of magnitude for GPT-3 training compute. Below is a step-by-step way to get there without looking anything up.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    GPT-6.1 Sol: Sally has 1 sister. Each brother’s two sisters are Sally and her sister.

    Qwen3.8 Flash: Sally has 1 sister. There are 2 girls total: Sally and one other sister. Each brother has those 2 sisters, so Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

12+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Sol

Spirited Away

2001

In Rainbows

Radiohead

Middlemarch

George Eliot

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Qwen3.8 FlashQwen3.8 Flash

Blade Runner 2049

2017

OK Computer

Radiohead

Neuromancer

William Gibson

Tokyo

Japan

Minecraft

Action, Arcade

Price and specs

Not enough votes to call it. On the specs, GPT-6.1 Sol has the edge: newer, major provider backing. Qwen3.8 Flash costs 21x less per token.

GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash compared across 49 shared prompts
SpecGPT-6.1 SolQwen3.8 Flash
Input price$2/M tokens$0.15/M tokens
Output price$10/M tokens$0.47/M tokens
Context window1.1M tokens1.0M tokens
WeightsClosedClosed
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedSep 2026Aug 2026
At 10M a month$20.00$20.00$1.50$1.50
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it3 hosts
GPT-6.1 Sol2 hosts
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Azure AI Foundry$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·99.9% up
  • OpenAI$2.00 in·$10.00 out·1.1M·99.9% up
Qwen3.8 Flash1 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • Alibaba Cloud$0.15 in·$0.47 out·1M·99.8% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 30 Sep 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol is developed by OpenAI while Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Qwen. GPT-6.1 Sol has a 1.1M token context window vs Qwen3.8 Flash's 1.0M. You can compare their actual outputs across 49 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, GPT-6.1 Sol or Qwen3.8 Flash?

It depends on your use case. GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 49 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does GPT-6.1 Sol cost compared to Qwen3.8 Flash?

GPT-6.1 Sol costs $2/M input tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input tokens. Qwen3.8 Flash is $1.85/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of GPT-6.1 Sol and Qwen3.8 Flash across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLanded Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLanded Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs Command A+Landed Sep 2026
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Astra ProVersion compare
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProSame lab
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeSame lab
  • Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashSame lab
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.5 35B A3BCross-provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.5 397B A17BCross-provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.5 9BCross-provider
  • GPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.5 FlashCross-provider

Model pages

  • GPT-6.1 Sol58 outputs, specs and price
  • Qwen3.8 Flash53 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed