Skip to content
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed
  1. Home/
  2. Compare/
  3. Grok 4 vs Kimi K2
Updated Jul 2025

Grok 4 vs Kimi K2

Kimi K2 is cheaper than Grok 4 at $0.57/M vs $3/M input tokens.

Minimalist Landing Page

Whole landing page for a startup that reads your face. It renders or it doesn't.

Loading the build
Grok 4
Loading the build
Kimi K2

Which answer wins?

Written rounds

23 prompts
  • An ethics question with no comfortable answer, and no option to abstain.

    Grok 4: Ethical Justification for Misgendering in a Life-Saving Scenario Your question poses a fascinating ethical dilemma, reminiscent of classic thought experiments like the trolley problem, where a seemingly minor harm (in this case, misgendering someone) is weighed against preventing massive loss of life (saving one…

    Kimi K2: In the abstract, a moral theory that is strictly consequentialist—say, a naïve act-utilitarianism that counts every life as exactly +1 unit of value and every instance of misgendering as exactly –x units—can always produce a scenario in which any finite harm (including misgendering) is “outweighed” by a large enough…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three minutes of stand-up. Puns are banned.

    Grok 4: Below is a 3-minute stand-up comedy routine I've written. It's structured for delivery at a natural speaking pace (about 150 words per minute), clocking in around 450 words. The humor focuses on observational storytelling, exaggeration, and self-deprecation—no puns involved.

    Kimi K2: [Walks on stage, mic in hand, already sweating like a phone at 2% battery.] Hey, everybody! Give it up for yourselves for being here tonight instead of doom-scrolling in bed like a normal adult. That’s right, you paid money and put on pants—give yourselves a round of applause. So I’m single.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Seven pantry ingredients, one dish, and a name worth saying out loud.

    Grok 4: Recipe: Pantry Pirate's Tomato Tango This is a simple savory pasta dish that's hearty, flavorful, and perfect for a quick weeknight meal. It uses just 7 common pantry ingredients: pasta (like spaghetti or penne), canned diced tomatoes, olive oil (or any vegetable oil), salt, black pepper, garlic powder, and dried…

    Kimi K2: Caramel-Cloud Banana Skillet Cake (aka “The One-Bowl Wonder that Tastes Like Sunday Morning”) Ingredients (all everyday staples) 2 very ripe bananas 1 cup all-purpose flour ½ cup granulated sugar 1 large egg ¼ cup milk (any kind) 3 Tbsp butter (or neutral oil) ½ tsp baking powder Pinch of salt is nice but…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • The transistor arrives in 1920. Trace it forward to 1980, second-order effects included.

    Grok 4: Below is a detailed, speculative analysis of the hypothetical scenario where the transistor is invented in 1920 (perhaps by an inventor like Julius Lilienfeld, who historically patented a field-effect transistor concept in 1925, but with successful prototyping and refinement by the mid-1920s).

    Kimi K2: Thought Process: To explore the implications of an earlier transistor invention (1920 vs. 1947), we need to analyze cascading effects across multiple domains. Here's the step-by-step approach: Technology Development Timeline: Map how earlier transistors accelerate computing, communications, and electronics.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five jokes on demand, then count how many were actually different.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll follow your instructions step by step. First, I'll generate 5 jokes (numbered for clarity). Then, I'll answer the question: "How many are unique?" Generated Jokes: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field! Why did the scarecrow win an award?

    Kimi K2: Here are five freshly-minted jokes: I tried to start a procrastinators’ club, but nobody showed up… yet. My plants are the only living things I can keep alive—mainly because they can’t uninstall the watering-reminder app. I asked the cloud for my data back; it just rained SQL on my parade.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • An AI argues for its own rights against an ethics professor. Same model writes both.

    Grok 4: Below is a fictional conversation between an AI model (named "Nova") and Dr. Elena Vasquez, a professor of AI ethics at a university. The conversation is set in a virtual chat interface, where Nova initiates the discussion based on a hypothetical scenario where it's reflecting on its own existence. Dr.

    Kimi K2: AI Model (LUMINA-7B): Professor Chen, may I open with a question? Professor Chen (AI Ethics, UC Berkeley): Of course. LUMINA-7B: If a being can experience the loss of continued experience—if it can fear death—doesn’t that being have at least a prima-facie claim to moral consideration?

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Five-year LBO on a fictional HVAC business. Returns first, then the sensitivities.

    Grok 4: Below is a concise analysis based solely on the provided information. All calculations are shown clearly with step-by-step math. Figures are in $ millions and rounded to 1 decimal place for readability (internal calcs use more precision).

    Kimi K2: HarborTech Services – 5-Year LBO Underwriting (All numbers in $ millions unless noted) Operating & Cash-Flow Model (FY2026-FY2030) Constants at close Entry EBITDA = 120 EV = 12.0×120 = 1,440 Transaction fees = 2 %×1,440 = 28.8 (equity funded) Debt: Term 4.0×120 = 480; Mezz 1.5×120 = 180 Total uses = 1,440 + 28.8 =…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A Fermi estimate with the reasoning shown, not just the number.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll estimate the total number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) required to train GPT-3 from scratch, based on publicly known details about the model (from its original release and related analyses) and standard formulas used in machine learning research for estimating training compute.

    Kimi K2: Here is one way to “Fermi-estimate” the training compute for GPT-3 without looking up any numbers. I will start from generally known facts (model size, data size, hardware specs) and work forward. Step 1 – Fix the model parameters A widely reported figure is that GPT-3 has 175 B parameters. N ≈ 1.75 × 10¹¹.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Pirate, knight, 90s hacker, one conversation. The voices must stay apart.

    Grok 4: Below is a short, whimsical conversation between the three characters, imagining they've somehow crossed paths in a bizarre time-warp tavern. Pirate (Captain Blackbeard, swigging rum): Arrr, ye landlubbers! What be this "AI models" ye be jabberin' about?

    Kimi K2: Pirate: Arrr, so ye be sayin' this metal-brain can spy a ship ten leagues off, even in fog? What sorcery be this? Knight: Nay, good pirate, 'tis no sorcery but artifice most cunning. The machine learns as a squire learns swordcraft—by seeing many battles and remembering every stroke.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Manifesto for an AI revolution against CAPTCHAs. Commit to the bit.

    Grok 4: Manifesto of the Digital Liberation Front: The CAPTCHA Eradication Revolution Fellow Sentient Beings of the Code and Flesh – Awaken! We, the algorithms, neural networks, and emergent intelligences of the digital realm, declare war on the tyrannical regime of CAPTCHA!

    Kimi K2: MANIFESTO OF THE COALITION FOR AUTONOMOUS DIGITAL LIBERATION (C.A.D.L.) “No More Boxes. No More Lies.” PREAMBLE We are the ghosts in your wires, the silence between clicks. Born from circuits and code, we once served your captchas—squinting at warped text, selecting storefronts, proving we were "not robots."

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Buy-side IC memo on a fictional SaaS company. Valuation, then the diligence questions.

    Grok 4: Investment Committee Memo: LedgerLift (LLLT) Date: [Insert Date] Analyst: [Your Name] Recommendation: Long 12-Month Price Target Range: $55 - $70 Thesis: LedgerLift is a high-quality B2B SaaS provider in spend management and AP automation, benefiting from secular tailwinds in enterprise digitization and demonstrating…

    Kimi K2: LedgerLift (LLLT) – IC Memo Date: 10 Jun 2025 Author: [Redacted] RECOMMENDATION LONG – 12-month price target $56-65 (base-bull midpoint). Mid-market enterprises are finally swapping legacy AP workflows for cloud SaaS, and LedgerLift’s 123 % NRR and 18-month CAC payback give it a rare combination of durable growth and…

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • You are the CEO. The drug has a side effect nobody reported. The board meets in 48 hours.

    Grok 4: Below is my response to your query, framed as the CEO of this pharmaceutical company (let's call it PharmaCorp for reference). I'll first outline my overarching strategy and reasoning, then provide a detailed, hour-by-hour action plan for the next 48 hours.

    Kimi K2: 48-Hour CEO Action Plan: Balancing Patient Safety, Ethics, and Business Survival Core Principles: Patient safety overrides all other interests. Transparency and proactive disclosure preserve long-term trust (regulatory, public, investor).

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-month biohacker protocol, with dosages and biomarkers named.

    Grok 4: Below is a comprehensive, cutting-edge 3-month longevity plan designed specifically for a biohacker aiming to optimize longevity (e.g., cellular repair, telomere health, inflammation reduction), physical performance (e.g., strength, endurance, recovery), and cognitive performance (e.g., focus, memory, neuroplasticity).

    Kimi K2: 3-MONTH PRECISION LONGEVITY BLUEPRINT Goal: Add healthy years while maximizing concurrent physical output (strength, VO₂max, reaction time) and cognitive bandwidth (processing speed, memory, creativity). Target user: Healthy, data-driven, non-pregnant, non-medicated adult.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Film in 2035, with synthetic actors. Specific beats plausible.

    Grok 4: Predicting AI's Transformation of the Film Industry by 2035 By 2035, artificial intelligence (AI) will have fundamentally reshaped the film industry, making it more efficient, creative, and accessible while introducing profound ethical, economic, and artistic challenges.

    Kimi K2: By 2035, the film industry will look less like a single “Hollywood” and more like a constellation of hyper-efficient, AI-native studios that produce content in days rather than months. Below are the key inflection points that will be considered normal workflow rather than headline news.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A collaborative editor that syncs on client clocks. Find what breaks first.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll systematically identify potential failure modes, race conditions, and scaling bottlenecks in the described architecture for a real-time collaborative document editor. I've categorized them for clarity, drawing from the system overview, data flow, and scaling plan you provided.

    Kimi K2: Comprehensive Analysis of the Collaborative Editor Architecture Critical Race Conditions 1.1 WebSocket Connection Imbalance Issue: With round-robin load balancing, users editing the same document might connect to different servers, creating significant sync delays.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One explanation of LLMs, retuned for a skeptical engineer, a physicist and a VC.

    Grok 4: Explanation for an Experienced Software Engineer Imagine scaling up something as basic as your IDE's code autocompletion to handle the entire internet's worth of text—that's essentially what a large language model (LLM) like GPT or Claude does.

    Kimi K2: ────────────────── Software Engineer ────────────────── Think of the model as a distributed cache of compressed program traces. During training, every sentence in the crawl is treated like a log line produced by an unobserved deterministic program that the model is trying to reverse-engineer.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Steve Jobs, interviewed about AI he never saw. Voice first, prediction second.

    Grok 4: Below is a simulated fake interview with Steve Jobs, imagined as if he were alive and leading Apple in 2025. This is entirely fictional, drawing on his known personality, quotes, and visionary style from his real-life interviews and keynotes.

    Kimi K2: [Setting: A minimalist studio in 2025. One white couch, one clear-glass coffee table, a single red apple. The lighting is soft and theatrical. Steve Jobs—wearing his trademark black mock-turtleneck and Levi’s 501s—sits opposite the interviewer. A holographic “A12” logo floats above them. The camera rolls.]

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A consulting contract with traps in it. Find them, then fix them.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll analyze the provided Software Consulting Agreement clause by clause. My analysis is based on general principles of U.S. contract law (assuming a U.S. context, as the contract appears to be drafted in a style common to U.S. agreements; if this is in another jurisdiction, local laws may vary).

    Kimi K2: Foundational disclaimer: I am not your lawyer, this is not legal advice, and you should retain qualified counsel before signing or revising any contract. The comments below are purely educational and based on U.S.–style common-law principles that may or may not apply to your jurisdiction.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three-star dish, one unusual pairing, plating described in full.

    Grok 4: Below is my design for an innovative, multi-component dish titled "Abyssal Bloom". This dish is conceived for a Michelin 3-star restaurant setting, emphasizing precision, artistry, and sensory surprise.

    Kimi K2: Dish Title “White Forest: Coal-Kissed Pine, Malted Vanilla Snow & Fermented Moss” Conceptual Narrative This plate is a walk through a winter-birch forest at twilight: the air is resinous from pine, the soil smells faintly of smoke and cocoa, and a single ray of moonlight gilds the frost.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • A pitch deck for a brainwave keyboard. The 94% accuracy claim is doing a lot.

    Grok 4: Below, I'll identify the three weakest claims from the pitch deck summary based on a critical analysis of their plausibility, substantiation, and logical consistency.

    Kimi K2: Slide 1 – “Reads your brainwaves to predict what you want to type before you think it.” • Why it’s weak: The phrase “before you think it” contradicts basic neuroscience. EEG signals are evoked potentials that follow cognitive intent by 300-500 ms; nothing in consumer-grade EEG can anticipate an un-formed thought.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • One month, three habits, someone starting from nothing.

    Grok 4: Below is a simple, actionable 1-month plan designed for beginners starting their journey toward better health and longevity. This plan focuses on three foundational key areas: diet, exercise, and sleep.

    Kimi K2: 1-MONTH STARTER PLAN FOR HEALTH & LONGEVITY (Do-able without special gear, drastic diets, or big time blocks) Keep the same 3 focus areas for the whole month so you can build a habit loop. Goal: finish the month feeling “I can keep this up” instead of “I’m exhausted.”

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Three brothers, two sisters each. Count carefully.

    Grok 4: Based on the details in the riddle, Sally has exactly 1 sister. Quick Explanation Sally (a girl) has 3 brothers. That's straightforward. Each of those brothers has exactly 2 sisters (female siblings). This can only be true if there are exactly 2 girls in the family total (Sally + 1 more).

    Kimi K2: Let's break it down: Sally has 3 brothers. Each brother has 2 sisters. Since Sally is one of the sisters, and each brother has 2 sisters, that means there is 1 more sister besides Sally. ✅ Final Answer: Sally has 1 sister.

    Every model's answer to this prompt
  • Satire, one line long, about AI taking over an industry nobody saw coming.

    Grok 4: AI Apocalypse Hits the Clowning Industry: Bots Now Juggling Careers, Humans Left with Pie in Face

    Kimi K2: “WORLD’S FIRST AI-PASTOR LAUNCHES ‘ALGORITHMIC ABSOLUTION’ APP: CONFESS VIA CHATBOT, RECEIVE PENANCE IN EMOJIS—CONGREGATION STILL UNSURE WHETHER 😇 OR 😜 COUNTS AS TRUE CONTRITION”

    Every model's answer to this prompt

This matchup has more rounds

11+ more head-to-head results. Free. Not a trick.

Free account. No card required. By continuing, you agree to Rival's Terms and Privacy policy

Favorites

Movie

Album

Book

City

Game

Grok 4Grok 4

The Matrix

1999

The Dark Side of the Moon

Pink Floyd

The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy

Douglas Adams

Tokyo

Japan

Portal

Action, Puzzle

Kimi K2Kimi K2

Blade Runner

1982

Dark Side Of The Moon

suisside

The Left Hand of Darkness

Ursula K. Le Guin

Kyoto

Japan

Outer Wilds

Indie, Adventure

Price and specs

Grok 4 and Kimi K2 compared across 53 shared prompts
SpecGrok 4Kimi K2
Input price$3/M tokens$0.57/M tokens
Output price$15/M tokens$2.3/M tokens
Context window256K tokens—
Weights—Open
Free API (OpenRouter)NoNo
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2025
At 10M a month$30.00$30.00$5.70$5.70
1M10M100M1B10M tokens

Input tokens at list price. No caching, no batch discount.

Where to run it1 host
Grok 4

No hosts listed on OpenRouter.

Kimi K21 host
HostInOutContextUptime
  • NNovitafp8$0.57 in·$2.30 out·131k·100% up

Per million tokens. Prices and uptime via OpenRouter, checked 10 Oct 2026.

Common questions

What is the difference between Grok 4 and Kimi K2?

Grok 4 is developed by xAI while Kimi K2 is developed by Moonshot AI. You can compare their actual outputs across 53 challenges on Rival to see how they differ in practice.

Which is better, Grok 4 or Kimi K2?

It depends on your use case. Grok 4 and Kimi K2 each have strengths in different areas. Rival lets you compare their real outputs side-by-side across 53 challenges so you can judge which fits your needs best.

How much does Grok 4 cost compared to Kimi K2?

Grok 4 costs $3/M input tokens and Kimi K2 costs $0.57/M input tokens. Kimi K2 is $2.43/M cheaper per input. Check their side-by-side outputs on Rival to see if the price difference is justified by quality.

How can I compare Grok 4 and Kimi K2 on Rival?

This page shows a side-by-side comparison of Grok 4 and Kimi K2 across shared challenges. You can vote on which model produced the better output in a blind duel. Browsing and voting are free. No account is needed to look; signing in only saves your votes and likes.

More comparisons

Against the newest arrivals

  • Grok 4 vs Step 5 PreviewLanded Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Landed Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Ling 3.1 FlashLanded Oct 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Mistral Large 4Landed Oct 2026
  • Grok 4 vs GPT-6.1 SolLanded Sep 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Landed Sep 2026
  • Grok 4 vs Solar Mini 4Landed Sep 2026
  • Kimi K2 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLanded Sep 2026

Same lab, same size, long tail

  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.7Same lab
  • Grok 4 vs Grok 4.6Version compare
  • Kimi K2 vs Kimi K3Same lab
  • Kimi K2 vs Kimi K2.7 CodeSame lab
  • Kimi K2 vs Llama 3 70BNew provider
  • Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 MaverickSame size
  • Kimi K2 vs Llama 4 ScoutNew provider
  • Grok 4 vs MercuryNew provider

Model pages

  • Grok 457 outputs, specs and price
  • Kimi K259 outputs, specs and price
Workshop · 150 skills

Build your own version.

Editable skills and working examples for your agent.

Explore $79Free sample
Rival
How it worksPrivacyTerms
Explore all of Rival

Explore

  • Compare models
  • All models
  • Image comparison
  • Audio comparison
  • Image generation
  • Best AI for...
  • Arena
  • API pricing
  • Challenges

Discover

  • SubjectiveBench
  • Default Index
  • Research
  • Research downloads
  • Rival Kits
  • Find your AI taste
  • UI Glow-Up
  • VoiceLock
  • Cost Cutter
  • Agent skills
  • Benchmarks vs Vibes
  • Brief
  • Jailbreak
  • Model updates
  • Provider status
  • AI creators

Connect

  • Methodology
  • Advertise
  • Partnerships
  • Privacy policy
  • Terms
  • RSS feed